Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Ann Emerg Med ; 22(6): 1060-3, 1993 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8503527

ABSTRACT

A 19-year-old woman sustained a nonfatal hanging injury and a 28-year-old man sustained a unilateral locked facet with resultant quadriplegia as a result of bungee jumping. Injuries due to this sport have not been reported previously.


Subject(s)
Athletic Injuries/etiology , Quadriplegia/etiology , Adult , Athletic Injuries/physiopathology , Athletic Injuries/therapy , Female , Humans , Male , Quadriplegia/diagnostic imaging , Quadriplegia/therapy , Radiography
2.
Am Heart J ; 117(3): 569-76, 1989 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2919536

ABSTRACT

The hemodynamic response to sequences of ventricular fibrillation and defibrillation includes an adrenergic component that is important for the maintenance of blood pressure after successful defibrillation. Because calcium channel blocking drugs have antiadrenergic effects, we hypothesized that they might blunt the adrenergic response to defibrillation. Ventricular fibrillation was induced in 35 closed-chest dogs. Each received 4 to 7 direct current transthoracic shocks at three energy levels to determine defibrillation energy requirements. Heart rate and blood pressure were recorded. Energy sequences were repeated after 45 minutes of no intervention (control, n = 5) or after 45-minute infusions of diltiazem (0.1 mg/kg/min, n = 10), verapamil (0.1 mg/kg bolus plus 0.01 mg/kg/min, n = 10), or nifedipine (40 micrograms/min for 3 minutes plus 2 to 20 micrograms/min adjusted to maintain a 10 mm Hg drop in mean arterial pressure, n = 10). Our results show that the normal post-shock rise in mean arterial pressure was blunted by the calcium channel blockers diltiazem (systolic arterial pressure at 15 and 60 seconds post-shock, pre-drug versus post-drug: 102 +/- 9 versus 64 +/- 9 mm Hg and 113 +/- 10 versus 87 +/- 6 mm Hg; p less than 0.05) and verapamil (108 +/- 9 versus 78 +/- 12 mm Hg and 113 +/- 7 versus 90 +/- 10 mm Hg, p less than 0.05). There were no differences in blood pressure responses after nifedipine treatment or no drug. Heart rate responses were not altered by diltiazem or verapamil; after nifedipine administration, post-shock heart rates were slower.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


Subject(s)
Calcium Channel Blockers/pharmacology , Electric Countershock , Hemodynamics/drug effects , Ventricular Fibrillation/physiopathology , Animals , Blood Pressure/drug effects , Cardiac Pacing, Artificial , Diltiazem/pharmacology , Dogs , Heart Conduction System/physiopathology , Heart Rate/drug effects , Nifedipine/pharmacology , Verapamil/pharmacology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...