ABSTRACT
CONTEXT: Tubal factors, one of the leading causes of female infertility, have been conventionally evaluated by hysterosalpingography (HSG). The role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in assessing female infertility is gaining importance because of its inherent efficiency in detecting structural abnormalities. Magnetic resonance hysterosalpingography (MR HSG) is less invasive and avoids exposure of ovaries to ionizing radiation. Its utility is extrapolated to visualize fallopian tubes. AIMS: To assess the diagnostic accuracies of dynamic MR HSG and conventional HSG (cHSG) in identifying tubal patency in women with infertility using diagnostic laparoscopy (DL) as gold standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective study of 40 patients was conducted over a period of 6 months. The patients were subjected to MR HSG followed by cHSG during the preovulatory period. If tubes were blocked, the patients were subjected to DL in the next menstrual cycle. If the tubes were patent and there was failure of conception, they were subjected to DL in the interval of 3 months. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients had bilateral tubal spill which was confirmed using cHSG and DL. One patient had discordant MR HSG and cHSG results and six patients had discordant MR HSG and DL results. No statistical difference was observed between MR HSG and cHSG. CONCLUSION: Pelvic MRI is an inevitable tool in infertility evaluation. MR HSG can be used in addition as it avoids exposure of the reproductive organs to radiation and has the same efficacy as cHSG.
ABSTRACT
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. PURPOSE: Identification of transitional vertebra is important in spine imaging, especially in presurgical planning. Pasted images of the whole spine obtained using high-field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are helpful in counting vertebrae and identifying transitional vertebrae. Counting vertebrae and identifying transitional vertebrae is challenging in isolated studies of lumbar spine and in studies conducted in low-field MRI. An incorrect evaluation may lead to wrong-level treatment. Here, we identify the location of different anatomical structures that can help in counting and identifying vertebrae. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Many studies have assessed the vertebral segments using various anatomical structures such as costal facets (CF), aortic bifurcation (AB), inferior vena cava confluence (IC), right renal artery (RRA), celiac trunk (CT), superior mesenteric artery root (SR), iliolumbar ligament (ILL) psoas muscle (PM) origin, and conus medullaris. However, none have yielded any consistent results. METHODS: We studied the locations of the anatomical structures CF, AB, IC, RRA, CT, SR, ILL, and PM in patients who underwent whole spine MRI at our department. RESULTS: In our study, 81.4% patients had normal spinal segmentation, 14.7% had sacralization, and 3.8% had lumbarization. Vascular landmarks had variable origin. There were caudal and cranial shifts with respect to lumbarization and sacralization. In 93.8% of cases in the normal group, ILL emerged from either L5 alone or the adjacent disc. In the sacralization group, ILL was commonly seen in L5. In the lumbarization group, ILL emerged from L5 and the adjacent disc (66.6%). CFs were identified at D12 in 96.9% and 91.7% of patients in the normal and lumbarization groups, respectively. The PM origin was observed from D12 or D12-L1 in most patients in the normal and sacralization groups. CONCLUSIONS: CF, PM, and ILL were good identification markers for D12 and L5, but none were 100% accurate.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Schmorl's Nodes (SN), which appear as defects in superior and inferior endplates of vertebrae, are commonly seen around the thoracolumbar junction. They may be asymptomatic or symptomatic. Their prevalence varies with respect to age, gender, regions involved and other associated disc or vertebral findings. AIM: SN is quite a common finding on the Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the spine. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the prevalence of SN in the patients who underwent MRI whole spine in the radiology department, ascertain its clinical relevance and to compare the prevalence of SN in the study population with the prevalence in rest of the Indian and global population described already in the literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical history and MRI images of the patients who underwent whole spine MRI study in the Radiology Department during the period of 6 months from June to December 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. The prevalence of SN, their location and associated imaging findings were studied. RESULTS: Of the 509 patients in the study, 47 had SN at one or more levels with prevalence of 9.2%. Maximum cases were seen in the 4(th) decade with least cases in the extremes of age. Twenty five patients had SN at thoracic levels. Twenty five patients had SN at lumbar levels. Twenty eight patients had SN at one intervertebral disc level. Other 19 patients had SN at multiple levels. Of the total 103 SN found, 57 were seen in the superior endplates and 46 in the inferior endplates. All SNs were in central position, except for one. Twelve of the 47 patients had disc degeneration at the same level as SN. Forty two of the 47 patients (89%) with Schmorl's nodes had associated spinal disc degenerative disease at the same or different levels. Modic type II endplate changes were demonstrated at the same level in 10 of the 47 patients with SN. Thirty eight of the 47 patients presented with history of backache. Only 9 of these patients had come with history of trauma; of these only four had wedge compression fracture at the level of SN. CONCLUSION: Schmorl's nodes in the studied South Indian population appear to show one of the lowest prevalence described on MRI, so far. Maximum number of SN occurred in the lower thoracic spine followed by the proximal lumbar spine. Schmorl's nodes are commonly associated with degenerative disc disease of the spine, though not at the same level.
