Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Palliat Med ; 11(1): 26-30, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18370888

ABSTRACT

Despite aggressive treatment, outcome of patients with glioblastoma is poor. Several distinct clinical problems arise in the terminal stage of this disease. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the end-of-life phase in a hospital setting in patients with glioblastoma. Twenty-nine consecutive patients with glioblastoma, who died in our department, were included in this analysis regarding symptoms, medication, diagnostics, and interventional procedures. The patients were comparable with respect to age, gender, and overall survival with data from the literature. Relevant clinical symptoms, medications, diagnostics, well as interventional procedures increased continuously toward end of life. Pain, epileptic seizures, and symptoms of brain edema were the most frequent clinical symptoms. According to this, most patients were on antiepileptic drugs (AED), steroids, and analgesics. In the last phase, symptoms from brain edema, fever, decrease of vigilance, dysphagia, and pneumonia were the prominent clinical features. Our study demonstrates that the end of life in patients with glioblastoma has several periods with different clinical aspects with respect to symptoms and treatment.


Subject(s)
Glioblastoma/physiopathology , Hospitals , Inpatients , Terminal Care , Terminally Ill , Aged , Austria/epidemiology , Female , Glioblastoma/drug therapy , Glioblastoma/radiotherapy , Humans , Male , Medical Audit , Middle Aged , Palliative Care , Retrospective Studies , Terminal Care/methods
2.
Wien Med Wochenschr ; 156(11-12): 329-31, 2006 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16944362

ABSTRACT

The treatment of brain tumors has improved in recent years. The principles of treatment are accurate diagnosis by imaging and neuropathology, treatment by neurosurgery, neurooncology, medical oncology, radiotherapy and optimal care and supportive strategies in a multidisciplinary setting. The development of multidisciplinary neurooncologic teams and of centers of excellence will further improve treatment quality and care. The multidisciplinary team is not confined to medical treatment alone, but needs the expertise of specially trained nurses, psychologists, occupational therapists, speech therapists and social workers to meet the needs of patients and carers.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms/therapy , Glioma/therapy , Patient Care Team , Combined Modality Therapy , Humans , Quality Assurance, Health Care
4.
J Neurooncol ; 72(3): 255-60, 2005 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15937649

ABSTRACT

The co-administration of antiepileptic drugs (AED) and chemotherapeutic agents in patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is common. Interactions of chemotherapeutic agents and AED have not been investigated sufficiently. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of enzyme inducing (EI-AED) and non-EI-AED in patients with GBM treated with standard chemotherapeutic agents on survival and haematotoxicity. One hundred and sixty eight glioblastoma patients with standard treatment including surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy were retrospectively analysed. Patients were separated into three groups: Group A patients without AED (n=88), Group B patients with EI-AED (n=43), and Group C patients with non-EI-AED (n=37). CCNU was the most frequently used first-line drug in all three groups (Group A: 77%; Group B: 81%; Group C: 78%). Second line treatment, mainly temozolomide, was applicated in 58 of patients and third-line treatment in 9. Carbamazepine was the most frequently administered AED in Group B (81%) and valproic acid in Group C (85%). For statistical analysis, only patients with CCNU first line treatment were calculated. A significant difference regarding survival was detected between Group B (10.8 month) and Group C (13.9 month), as well as increased haematotoxicity for Group C. These results indicate that AED influence the pharmacokinetics of chemotherapeutic drugs in patients with GBM. Valproic acid might be responsible for increasing haematotoxicity. Whether the difference regarding survival between Group B and Group C is due to a decrease of efficacy of chemotherapeutic agents by EI-AED, or due to increased efficacy of chemotherapeutic agents caused by the enzyme inhibiting properties of valproic acid, has to be evaluated in future studies.


Subject(s)
Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Brain Neoplasms/complications , Brain Neoplasms/drug therapy , Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System/biosynthesis , Enzyme Induction/drug effects , Glioblastoma/complications , Glioblastoma/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Blood Cell Count , Brain Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Combined Modality Therapy , Female , Glioblastoma/radiotherapy , Humans , Lomustine/therapeutic use , Male , Middle Aged , Neurosurgical Procedures , Retrospective Studies , Seizures/complications , Seizures/drug therapy , Survival , Survival Analysis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...