Sustained Psoriasis Area and Severity Index, Dermatology Life Quality Index and EuroQol-5D response of biological treatment in psoriasis: 10 years of real-world data in the Swedish National Psoriasis Register.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have analysed the long-term effects of biological treatment in psoriasis. PsoReg, the Swedish national register for systemic psoriasis treatment, started in 2006 and now includes 10 years of real-world data on the effectiveness of biological treatment. OBJECTIVES: To analyse the long-term real-world outcome data of patients who are biologically naïve with moderate-to-severe psoriasis after switching to biological treatment. METHODS: An observational study of patients who are biologically naïve with at least one registration of outcome before switching to biological treatment while included in PsoReg and at least one follow-up visit. Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) values were analysed at 3-5 months, 6-11 months and at least once after ≥ 1 year, up to 9 years after the switch to biological treatment. RESULTS: In total, 583 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Of these, 399, 395 and 373 patients had observed outcome data beyond 1 year on the PASI, DLQI and EQ-5D, respectively, and 164, 168 and 152, respectively, were observed in at least three time periods after the switch. Significant (P < 0·01) improvement in PASI, DLQI and EQ-5D scores was observed 3-5 months after the switch and sustained under the whole observation period. The mean PASI, DLQI and EQ-5D changed from 13·5 ± 9·1, 9·0 ± 8·1 and 0·74 ± 0·22, respectively, before the switch, to 4·0 ± 3·5, 3·7 ± 4·7 and 0·79 ± 0·21, respectively, 1-5 years after the switch. CONCLUSIONS: Biological treatment, as used in clinical practice, shows a stable long-term effectiveness in all the measured dimensions, PASI, DLQI and EQ-5D.

Total cost and cost predictors in systemic lupus erythematosus - 8-years follow-up of a Swedish inception cohort.

OBJECTIVE: To study the annual direct and indirect costs in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and how age, disease manifestations, disease activity, and organ damage influence total costs and predicted costs for SLE. METHODS: Clinical data on all patients with a diagnosis of SLE living in a defined area in southern Sweden during eight years were linked to health authority registries and the social insurance system which contain data on cost. Cost data on four matched population controls for each patient were also extracted. The controls were matched for age, sex, and area of residence. RESULTS: Data from 127 patients with SLE and 508 population controls were extracted. The mean annual total cost for SLE patients was SEK 180,520 ($30,093); the highest costs were found in the subgroup with nephritis SEK 229,423 ($38,246). The total costs for the patient group were significantly higher (p < 0.05) compared to the population controls of SEK 59,985 ($10,000). Of the total costs, 72% were due to indirect costs, 3% to SLE-specific pharmaceuticals, and the remaining 25% were in- and outpatient related costs. During the study period, inpatient days decreased by 60%, while outpatient contacts increased by 25%. Age (inverse relation), increasing disease activity, and acquired organ damage were significant predictors of total costs (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The total annual costs for unselected SLE patients were found to be three times those for matched population controls. Important predictors of total costs were found.

Cost-effectiveness of a barrier-strengthening moisturizing cream as maintenance therapy vs. no treatment after an initial steroid course in patients with atopic dermatitis in Sweden--with model applications for Denmark, Norway and Finland.

BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis (AD) affects health and quality of life and it has great impact on both health-care costs and costs to the society. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to develop a model to analyse the cost-effectiveness of a barrier-strengthening moisturizing cream as maintenance therapy compared with no treatment after initial treatment with betamethasone valerate in adult patients with AD in Sweden. A further aim was to apply a similar health-economic analysis for Denmark, Norway and Finland. METHODS: A Markov simulation model was developed including data from three sources: (i) efficacy data from a randomized controlled trial including patients with moderate AD treated with either a moisturizing cream or no treatment, (ii) resource utilization and quality of life data, and (iii) unit prices from official price lists. A societal perspective was used and the analysis was performed according to treatment practice in Sweden. The model simulation was also applied for Denmark, Norway and Finland with inclusion of country-specific unit costs. Sensitivity analyses were performed to test the robustness of the results. RESULTS: The results from the present analyses of treatment for patients with moderate AD indicate that maintenance treatment with a moisturizing cream during eczema-free periods could be cost-effective in a societal perspective. Similar results were obtained for Sweden, Denmark, Norway and Finland. CONCLUSIONS: According to the analysis, treatment with a moisturizing cream was found to be a cost-effective option compared with no treatment in eczema-free periods in adult patients with AD in the four Nordic countries.