Combined Lateral Transpsoas Anterior Column Realignment with Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy to Treat Severe Sagittal Plane Deformity: Cadaveric Feasibility Study and Early Clinical Experience.

BACKGROUND: Traditional open approaches to correct lumbar spine deformities include 3-column osteotomies, such as a pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO). Minimally invasive surgical (MIS) techniques have been developed for lateral transpsoas anterior column realignment (ACR). These 2 techniques have not previously been combined. Our objective was to investigate the cadaveric feasibility of a combined hybrid MIS ACR-PSO technique for deformity correction and to review early clinical experience. METHODS: The feasibility of the combined ACR-PSO technique was evaluated in 4 fresh cadaveric specimens. The operative experience, complications, and early clinical outcomes in patients treated with the combined approach to correct global sagittal imbalance were reviewed. RESULTS: In the cadaveric study, the combined ACR-PSO resulted in a mean 46.0° increase in lordosis (P < 0.001). Nine patients treated with ACR-PSO were evaluated (mean age, 65.2 years; 33.3% female). Most patients (6/9; 66.7%) underwent ACR at L1/2 or L3/4; 8 (88.8%) had PSO at L3 or L4. On average, 10.6 ± 3.8 levels were fused. Significant decreases in mean pelvic tilt (P = 0.01), spinopelvic mismatch (P < 0.001), and T1 spinopelvic inclination (P = 0.03) were observed postoperatively; mean lumbar lordosis (P = 0.007), intradiscal angle (P = 0.001), and thoracic kyphosis (P = 0.04) significantly increased. The overall complication rate was 55.6% (5/9). CONCLUSIONS: Our early experience suggests that a combined ACR-PSO with posterior fixation allows for significant correction of segmental lordosis and global imbalance. This combined approach may maximize results attainable with hybrid MIS-open surgical techniques and represents a complementary option to PSO and other posterior approaches.

Techniques and outcomes of microsurgical management of ruptured and unruptured fusiform cerebral aneurysms.

OBJECTIVE Fusiform cerebral aneurysms represent a small portion of intracranial aneurysms; differ in natural history, anatomy, and pathology; and can be difficult to treat compared with saccular aneurysms. The purpose of this study was to examine the techniques of treatment of ruptured and unruptured fusiform intracranial aneurysms and patient outcomes. METHODS In 45 patients with fusiform aneurysms, the authors retrospectively reviewed the presentation, location, and shape of the aneurysm; the microsurgical technique; the outcome at discharge and last follow-up; and the change in the aneurysm at last angiographic follow-up. RESULTS Overall, 48 fusiform aneurysms were treated in 45 patients (18 male, 27 female) with a mean age of 49 years (median 51 years; range 6 months-76 years). Twelve patients (27%) had ruptured aneurysms and 33 (73%) had unruptured aneurysms. The mean aneurysm size was 8.9 mm (range 6-28 mm). The aneurysms were treated by clip reconstruction (n = 22 [46%]), clip-wrapping (n = 18 [38%]), and vascular bypass (n = 8 [17%]). The mean (SD) hospital stay was 19.0 ± 7.4 days for the 12 patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage and 7.0 ± 5.6 days for the 33 patients with unruptured aneurysms. The mean follow-up was 38.7 ± 29.5 months (median 36 months; range 6-96 months). The mean Glasgow Outcome Scale score for the 12 patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage was 3.9; for the 33 patients with unruptured aneurysms, it was 4.8. No rehemorrhages occurred during follow-up. The overall annual risk of recurrence was 2% and that of rehemorrhage was 0%. CONCLUSIONS Fusiform and dolichoectatic aneurysms involving the entire vessel wall must be investigated individually. Although some of these aneurysms may be amenable to primary clipping and clip reconstruction, these complex lesions often require alternative microsurgical and endovascular treatment. These techniques can be performed with acceptable morbidity and mortality rates and with low rates of early rebleeding and recurrence.