Prevalence and Risk Factors for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome Among Children and Adolescents with Cleft lip and Palate: A Survey Study in Hong Kong.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) risk and related risk factors among children and adolescents of Hong Kong with cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P). DESIGN: Retrospective survey study adopting three questionnaires, obstructive sleep apnea-18 (OSA-18), pediatric sleep questionnaire-22 (PSQ-22), and modified Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS). SETTINGS: Multicenter study in two public hospitals. PATIENTS: A total of 351 Chinese children and adolescents with non-syndromic CL/P (6-18-year-old, 57% males) visited between September 2017 and November 2019, with primary palatal repair surgery done before 3-year-old. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Positive OSAS risk was determined based on cut-off ≥60 for OSA-18, ≥8 for PSQ-22, and >8 for ESS. Age, sex, overweight presence, cleft type, embryonic secondary palate involvement, palatal repair surgery, palatal revision surgery, and orthodontic treatment were analyzed as possible risk factors. RESULTS: A total of 9.5% of patients had positive OSAS risk based on OSA-18, 13.6% based on PSQ-22, and 13.2% according to ESS. A higher prevalence of patients with positive OSAS risk was of younger age (OSA-18, p = .034), had cleft involving embryonic secondary palate (PSQ-22, p = .009), and history of fixed orthodontic treatment (ESS, p = .002). The regression model identified only involvement of embryonic secondary palate as a risk factor (PSQ-22, odds ratio = 3.7, p = .015). CONCLUSIONS: OSAS risk among children and adolescents of Hong Kong with CL/P was 9.5% to 13.6%. Patients at higher risk were those with cleft involving embryonic secondary palate. OSAS risk assessment may be influenced by different aspects of the disease spectrum, and a multimodal approach should be considered for such assessment.

Biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in juvenile idiopathic arthritis of polyarticular course, enthesitis-related arthritis, and psoriatic arthritis: a consensus statement.

OBJECTIVES: Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is the most common type of inflammatory arthritis in children. Treatment options have been expanded since the introduction of biologics, which are highly effective. The existing local JIA treatment guideline was published more than a decade ago, when use of biologics was not as common. In this article, we review the latest evidence on using biologics in three JIA subtypes: JIA of polyarticular course (pcJIA), enthesitis-related arthritis (ERA), and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Based on the latest information, an update on eligibility, response assessment, termination, and safety information for using biologics in these patients was performed. CONSENSUS PROCESS: The JIA Work Group, which consisted of nine paediatricians experienced in managing JIA, was convened in 2016. Publications before July 2017 were screened. Eligible articles were clinical trials, extension studies, systemic reviews, and recommendations from international societies and regulatory agencies about the use of biologics in pcJIA, ERA, and PsA. Evidence extraction, appraisal, and drafting of propositions were performed by two reviewers. Extracted evidence and drafted propositions were presented and discussed at the first two meetings. Overwhelming consensus was obtained at the final meeting in May 2018. Seven practice consensus statements were formulated. Regular review should be performed to keep the practice evidence-based and up-to-date.