1.
Occup Health Saf
; 82(8): 32, 34, 2013 Aug.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-24000567
2.
Occup Health Saf
; 81(1): 10, 12, 2012 Jan.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-22295594
3.
Occup Health Saf
; 80(10): 34, 36, 38, 2011 Oct.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-22069863
4.
Occup Health Saf
; 80(4): 36-8, 2011 Apr.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-21561006
ABSTRACT
With OSHA early documents falling on the side of EH shoes for electrical work, companies would do well to consider them for all electrical workers and other workers exposed to electrical hazards or damp locations. These shoes rarely add more than $5 to the cost of the shoe and have been known to save lives. They should be considered for low-voltage (<750V) and low-risk tasks. High-risk tasks, environments, and medium and high voltages require more and more stable protection. ASTM F1117 shoes provide this type of protection and are the preferred step potential PPE option in both OSHA 1910.269 and NFPA 70E.
Subject(s)
Protective Clothing/standards , Shoes/standards , Equipment Design , Humans , United States , United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration
5.
Occup Health Saf
; 77(8): 26, 28, 30, 2008 Aug.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-18717467
Subject(s)
Accidents, Occupational/prevention & control , Burns, Electric/prevention & control , Diffusion of Innovation , Global Health , Protective Clothing , Flame Retardants , Humans , Safety Management/trends , United States , United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration/standards
6.
Occup Health Saf
; 76(5): 74, 76, 78, 2007 May.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-17542219
7.
Occup Health Saf
; 72(5): 90-2, 94, 2003 May.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-12754864