Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Clin Microbiol ; 17(2): 267-71, 1983 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-6833480

ABSTRACT

Species of coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from urine specimens submitted from both inpatients and outpatients to the clinical microbiology laboratory of a teaching hospital were identified with a biotyping system, with species then correlated by clinical features and antimicrobial susceptibility. Of 145 isolates, 102 (70%) were Staphylococcus epidermidis, 24 (17%) were Staphylococcus saprophyticus, 7 (4.7%) were Staphylococcus haemolyticus, 4 (2.8%) were Staphylococcus hominis, 3 (2.1%) were Staphylococcus simulans, and 5 (3.4%) were other species. Features characterizing persons with bacteriuria with S. saprophyticus compared with bacteriuria with any other species included female sex (95% versus 52%), young age (median age, 22 years versus 61 years), ambulatory status (hospital outpatients, 86% versus 23%), and absence of indwelling catheters (4.5% versus 49%). All other coagulase-negative staphylococci were isolated in a setting suggesting nosocomial acquisition, were more frequently resistant to common antimicrobial agents (42% multiply resistant versus 4.2% of S. saprophyticus), and were not distinguished by clinical features. Novobiocin susceptibility, with a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 96%, provided a simple and reliable test for differentiation of S. saprophyticus from other coagulase-negative staphylococci and should be routinely used for urinary tract specimens in the clinical laboratory.


Subject(s)
Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Staphylococcus/classification , Urinary Tract Infections/microbiology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Coagulase/metabolism , Humans , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Staphylococcus/drug effects , Staphylococcus/enzymology
2.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 11(5): 780-4, 1977 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-327919

ABSTRACT

Fifty-two patients, 48 females and 4 males, with suspected urinary infection were treated with amoxicillin. Twenty-two females with presumed bladder infection were treated with amoxicillin, 250 mg three times a day for 7 days; 26 females and 4 males with presumed renal infection were treated with amoxicillin, 500 mg three times a day for 14 days. Five patients were immediate treatment failures, with positive urine cultures during therapy. All five patients had been infected with amoxicillin-resistant urinary pathogens. Three patients, treated as for bladder infections, reinfected during 6 weeks of follow-up, and only one relapsed. Two patients, treated as for renal infections, reinfected, whereas four relapsed. During therapy, amoxicillin-susceptible gram-negative rods were eradicated from the periurethral area in all but one patient. Of 28 patients studied, 19 acquired a predominant growth of either resistant aerobic gram-negative rods or Candida albicans from periurethral cultures. Our findings suggest that these two regimens of amoxicillin achieve satisfactory cure rates in urinary infection, but both regimens significantly alter the normal periurethral flora.


Subject(s)
Amoxicillin/therapeutic use , Ampicillin/analogs & derivatives , Urinary Tract Infections/drug therapy , Acute Disease , Adult , Amoxicillin/administration & dosage , Clinical Trials as Topic , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Humans , Male , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Urethra/microbiology , Urinary Tract Infections/microbiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...