Improved Sexual Function After Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty for Osteoarthritis.

Osteoarthritis of the hip and knee is known to affect sexual activity. For patients with osteoarthritis, pain during sexual activity can lead to decreased quality of life and other associated health issues. The authors designed a prospective study to evaluate the effect of total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty on the psychosocial and physical aspects of sexuality pre- and postoperatively. Between April 2009 and December 2011, patients received questionnaires in the mail preoperatively. They were asked to return the preoperative questionnaire before surgery and the postoperative questionnaire 6 months after surgery. Data were analyzed to evaluate the psychosocial and physical aspects of sexuality and participants' subjective assessment of their appearance. Preoperatively, 91% and 67% of patients reported psychosocial and physical issues, respectively. After the arthroplasty procedure, 84% (P<.001) and 47% (P<.001) of patients reported improvement psychosocially and physically, respectively. Of the patients, 16% reported that arthroplasty adversely affected sexual function, with their predominant fear being joint damage (63%). A greater number of women and patients undergoing hip procedures reported improvement in sexual activity after surgery compared with men (P=.02) and patients undergoing knee procedures (P=.002). Both hip and knee osteoarthritis and arthroplasty had a significant effect on overall sexual function-psychosocially, physically, and in terms of patients' assessment of their external appearance-with higher rates of improvement seen after hip arthroplasty. Because of the effect of osteoarthritis and arthroplasty on sexual function, this topic should be addressed both pre- and postoperatively. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(2):111-116.].

Effect of Intraoperative Platelet-Rich Plasma Treatment on Postoperative Donor Site Knee Pain in Patellar Tendon Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Donor site morbidity in the form of anterior knee pain is a frequent complication after bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autograft anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Hypothesis/Purpose: The purpose was to examine the effect of the intraoperative administration of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) on postoperative kneeling pain. It was hypothesized that PRP treatment would reduce knee pain. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: Fifty patients (mean ± SD age, 30 ± 12 years) undergoing BPTB ACL autograft reconstruction were randomized to the PRP (n = 27) or sham (n = 23) treatment. In either case, 10 mL of venous blood was drawn before the induction of anesthesia and either discarded (sham) or processed (PRP) for preparation of a PRP gel to be later mixed with donor site bone chips and inserted into the patellar defect. At 12 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after surgery, patients completed International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) forms and visual analog scale pain scores for activities of daily living and kneeling. Healing indices at the donor site were assessed by routine noncontrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 6 months. Mixed-model analysis of variance was used to assess the effect of PRP on patient symptoms and MRI indices of donor site healing, as measured by the width of the donor site defect. RESULTS: Kneeling pain, pain with activities of daily living, and IKDC scores were not different between treatment groups at any of the time intervals ( P = .08-.83). Kneeling pain improved from 12 weeks to 6 months and from 1 to 2 years ( P < .05). IKDC scores improved substantially from 12 weeks to 6 months ( P < .001) and continued to improve to 2 years (PRP, 86 ± 19; sham, 89 ± 10). MRI indices of donor site healing were not different between treatment groups ( P = .53-.90). CONCLUSION: Whether randomized to receive PRP in their patellar defect or not, patients continued to have similar levels of kneeling pain and patellar defect sizes after autograft BPTB ACL reconstruction. Registration: NCT01765712 ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

Arthroscopic Treatment of Osseous Instability of the Shoulder.

BACKGROUND: Bony deficiency of the anteroinferior glenoid rim as a result of a dislocation can lead to recurrent glenohumeral instability. These lesions, traditionally treated by open techniques, are increasingly being treated arthroscopically as our understanding of the pathophysiology and anatomy of the glenohumeral joint becomes clearer. Different techniques for arthroscopic management have been described and continue to evolve. While the success of the repair is surgeon dependent, the recent advances in arthroscopic shoulder surgery have contributed to the growing acceptance of arthroscopic reconstruction of glenoid bone defects to restore stability. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purpose of this study was to describe arthroscopic surgical management options for patients with glenohumeral osseous lesions and instability. METHODS: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Cochrane, and Medline was conducted to identify eligible studies. The reference lists of identified articles were then screened. Both technique articles and long-term outcome studies evaluating arthroscopic management of glenohumeral lesions were included. RESULTS: Studies included for final analysis ranged from Level II to V evidence. Technique articles include suture anchor fixation of associated glenoid rim fractures, arthroscopic reduction and percutaneous fixation of greater tuberosity fractures, arthroscopic filling ("remplissage") of the humeral Hill-Sachs lesion, and an all-arthroscopic Latarjet procedure. The overall redislocation rate varied but was consistently <10% with a low complication rate. CONCLUSION: Management of glenohumeral instability can be challenging but more recent advances in arthroscopic techniques have provided improved means of treating this diagnosis. This manuscript provides a comprehensive review of the arthroscopic treatment of osseous instability of the shoulder. It provides an in depth look at the various treatment options and describes techniques for each.

Functional outcomes and patient satisfaction after fasciotomy for chronic exertional compartment syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic exertional compartment syndrome who have failed nonoperative treatment are evaluated with pre-exertion and postexertion compartment pressure testing and may be treated with fasciotomy. Failure rates of up to 20% have been reported and may be related to factors such as age, sex, postexertion compartment pressures, compartment(s) released, and duration of symptoms. HYPOTHESIS: Higher preoperative postexertion compartment pressures are correlated with higher success and patient satisfaction rates after fasciotomy. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: From 1999 to 2008, patients with clinical symptoms of chronic exertional compartment syndrome with failed nonoperative management underwent standardized pre-exertion and postexertion compartment pressure measurements. Patients were then offered continued nonoperative treatment or referral to an orthopaedic surgeon for compartment release. Patients with a minimum 2-year follow-up were given a telephone questionnaire describing their pretreatment and posttreatment conditions including quality and duration of symptoms, analog pain scale, symptomatic and functional responses to treatment, and satisfaction with treatment. Medical records and operative reports were reviewed. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period for the nonoperative treatment group (n = 27) was 5.6 years (range, 2.1-10.6) and for the operative group (n = 73) was 5.2 years (range, 2.0-11.3). The operative group had a higher success rate (81%) compared with the nonoperative group (41%) (P < .001), and the operative group had a higher patient satisfaction rate (81%) compared with the nonoperative group (56%) (P = .011). There was no significant correlation between compartment pressures and patient outcomes. Patients with combined anterior and lateral compartment releases had an increased failure rate compared with isolated anterior release (31% vs. 0%, respectively; P = .035). Surgical patients who were post-college had a lower satisfaction rate (66%) compared with high school (89%) and college patients (94%) (P = .017). CONCLUSION: High school and college patients (age <23 years) and isolated anterior compartment release (compared with anterior/lateral release) were factors associated with improved subjective function and satisfaction after fasciotomy. We recommend the avoidance of lateral release unless symptoms or postexertion compartment pressures are clearly indicative of lateral compartment involvement.