Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Bioresour Technol ; 100(21): 4945-54, 2009 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19546000

ABSTRACT

The aim of this review is to summarize current knowledge on suitability and sustainability of grassland biomass for combustion. In the first section grassland management for solid biofuel as well as information on harvest, postharvest and firing technology are described. An extensive grassland management system with one late cut and low level of fertilization is favored for grass as a solid biofuel. The grass harvest usually involves drying in the field and clearing with conventional farm machinery. Pelleting or briquetting improves the biofuel quality. Grass combustion is possible as stand-alone biomass-firing or co-firing with other fuels. Firing herbaceous biomass requires various specific adaptations of the different combustion technologies. In the second section economic and environmental aspects are discussed. Costs for biomass supply mainly depend on yields and harvesting technologies, while combustion costs are influenced by the size and technical design of the plant. Market prices for grass and possible subsidies for land use are crucial for profitability. Regarding biogeochemical cycles a specific feature of combustion is the fact that none of the biomass carbon and nitrogen removed at harvest is available for return to the grassland. These exports can be compensated for by fixation from the air given legumes in the vegetation and sufficient biomass production. Greenhouse gas emissions can be considerably reduced by grass combustion. Solid biofuel production has a potential for predominantly positive impacts on biodiversity due to the extensive grassland management.


Subject(s)
Agriculture , Bioelectric Energy Sources , Poaceae/chemistry , Bioelectric Energy Sources/economics , Environment
2.
Bioresour Technol ; 100(21): 4931-44, 2009 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19546001

ABSTRACT

Grassland biomass is suitable in numerous ways for producing energy. It is well established as feedstock for biogas production. The aim of this review is to summarize current knowledge on suitability and sustainability of grassland biomass for anaerobic digestion. In the first section grassland management for biogas feedstock as well as specifics of harvest, postharvest and digestion technology are described. Methane yields from grass are influenced by many factors. While the effects of some parameters such as grass species, cutting period and management intensity can be regarded as well known, other parameters such as preservation and processing still need investigation. In the second section economic aspects and environmental impacts are discussed. Profitability can be achieved depending on grass silage supply costs and the concept of anaerobic digestion and energy use. Grassland biomass for biogas production competes with other feedstock and other forms of grassland use, in particular animal husbandry. In developed countries a growing production of milk and meat is achieved with decreasing ruminant numbers, resulting in an increasing amount of surplus grassland with a remarkable bioenergy potential. In emerging and developing countries a rapidly rising demand for and production of milk and meat induce growing pressure on grasslands, so that their use for animal feed presumably will take priority over use for bioenergy. Grasslands provide a variety of essential environmental benefits such as carbon storage, habitat function, preservation of ground and surface water quality. When producing biogas from grassland these benefits will remain or even grow, providing appropriate grassland management is implemented. In particular, greenhouse gas emissions can be considerably reduced.


Subject(s)
Agriculture , Bioelectric Energy Sources , Gases/chemistry , Poaceae/chemistry , Bioelectric Energy Sources/economics , Environment
3.
J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol ; 29(3): 99-110, 2002 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12242630

ABSTRACT

The effects of different straw types and organic and inorganic nitrogen (N) sources on the chemical composition and odor concentration (OC) of mushroom composting emissions, compost parameters, and mushroom yield were examined using bench-scale and large-scale (windrows and aerated tunnels) composting systems. There were close correlations between the butanol or combined H(2)S+dimethyl sulfide (DMS) concentration and OC of air samples taken from different composting ingredients (r=0.83 and 0.76-0.87, P<0.01, for log(e)-transformed data). Differences in N availability, in terms of NH(3) and N losses during composting, were found between different N sources. Materials in which the N was less available (chipboard and digester wastes, cocoa shells, ammonium sulfate) produced lower mushroom yields than materials in which the N was more readily available (poultry manure, urea, brewers' grains, hop and molasses wastes, cocoa meal). Replacement of poultry manure with the other N sources at 50-100% or wheat straw with rape, bean, or linseed straw in aerated tunnel or windrow composts reduced the OC and emissions of odorous sulfur-containing compounds, but also reduced yield. Urea and cocoa meal may be suitable for "low odor" prewetting of straw, with addition of poultry manure immediately before aerated tunnel composting. Rape straw in compost reduces the formation of anaerobic zones and resulting odorous emissions, since it maintains its structure and porosity better than wheat straw.


Subject(s)
Agaricales/growth & development , Agaricales/metabolism , Agriculture/methods , Nitrogen/metabolism , Ammonia/metabolism , Animals , Environmental Monitoring , Gases/analysis , Manure , Odorants/analysis , Sulfides/analysis , Temperature , Triticum
4.
J Environ Qual ; 30(3): 760-7, 2001.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11401265

ABSTRACT

Odor pollution is a major problem facing mushroom [Agaricus bisporus (Lange) Imbach] compost production. Techniques for quantifying mushroom composting odors are needed to assess the effectiveness of odor control measures. Odor samples were obtained in nalophane bags from 11 mushroom composting sites. Samples were collected 0.2 m downwind from the pre-wetting heaps (aerated or unaerated) of raw composting ingredients (wheat straw, poultry and horse manures, and gypsum) and subsequent Phase I composting windrows or aerated tunnels. The odor concentrations (OCs) of the samples were assessed using serial dilution olfactometry and the chemical composition of the samples was determined using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), both 24 h after sampling. Gas detector tubes were used for on-site measurement of gaseous compounds. Odorants that exceeded their published olfactory detection thresholds by the greatest order of magnitude, in decreasing order, were: H2S, dimethyl sulfide (DMS), butanoic acid, methanethiol, and trimethylamine. Concentrations of NH3 were not significantly correlated with OC, and they were not significantly affected by the use of aeration. Aeration reduced the OC and the combined H2S + DMS concentrations by 87 and 92%, respectively. There was a very close correlation (r = 0.948, P < 0.001) between the OC of bag samples and the combined H2S + DMS concentrations, measured on-site with detector tubes. This relationship was unaffected by the NH3 concentration or the type of compost: aerated or unaerated, pre-wet or Phase I, poultry manure-based or horse and poultry manure-based compost. Prediction of the OC will enable rapid and low-cost identification of odor sources on mushroom composting sites.


Subject(s)
Agaricales/metabolism , Environmental Monitoring/methods , Odorants , Agriculture , Air Pollutants/analysis , Biodegradation, Environmental , Conservation of Natural Resources , Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry , Hydrogen Sulfide/analysis , Sensitivity and Specificity , Specimen Handling , Sulfides/analysis , Waste Products
5.
J Environ Qual ; 30(2): 345-55, 2001.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11285894

ABSTRACT

This paper reviews the use of additives to reduce odor and ammonia (NH3) emissions from livestock wastes. Reduction of NH3 volatilization has been shown to be possible, particularly with acidifying and adsorbent additives, and potential exists to develop further practical and cost-effective additives in this area. Masking, disinfecting, and oxidizing agents can provide short-term control of malodor, but as the capacity of these additives is finite, they require frequent reapplication. Microbial-based digestive additives may offer a solution to this problem as they are regenerative, but they appear to have been developed without a thorough understanding of microbiological processes occurring in livestock wastes. Currently, their use to reduce odor or NH3 emissions cannot be recommend. If the potential of these types of additives is to be realized, research needs to shift from simply evaluating these unknown products to investigating known strains of bacteria or enzymes with known modes of action. To protect the farmers' interest, standard independent test procedures are required to evaluate efficacy. Such tests should be simple and quantify the capacity of the additive to perform as claimed. The principle use of additives needs to be identified and addressed during their development. Producers may not use effective additives in one area if they further compound other problems that they perceived to be more important. There is the potential to use additives to treat other problems associated with livestock wastes, particularly to improve handling properties, reduce pollution potential to watercourses, and reduce pathogenic bacteria. Further work is required in these areas.


Subject(s)
Ammonia/metabolism , Animals, Domestic , Odorants , Refuse Disposal/methods , Water Pollution/prevention & control , Absorption , Acids , Animals , Bacteria , Enzyme Inhibitors , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Oxidation-Reduction , Volatilization
6.
J Anim Sci ; 77(2): 430-9, 1999 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10100673

ABSTRACT

Recent public concern about air pollution from pork production units has prompted more research to develop methods to reduce and control odors. Masking agents, enzymes and bacterial preparations, feed additives, chemicals, oxidation processes, air scrubbers, biofilters, and new ventilation systems have been studied. Research relating the effects of the swine diet on manure odors has been scarce. Introducing feed additives to bind ammonia, change digesta pH, affect specific enzyme activity, and mask odors has been either costly or not consistently successful. Recent research emphasis has focused on manipulating the diet 1) to increase the nutrient utilization of the diet to reduce excretion products, 2) to enhance microbial metabolism in the lower digestive tract to reduce excretion of odor-causing compounds, and 3) to change the physical characteristics of urine and feces to reduce odor emissions. Primary odor-causing compounds evolve from excess degradable proteins and lack of specific fermentable carbohydrates during microbial fermentation. Reductions in ammonia emissions by 28 to 79% through diet modifications have been reported. Limited research on reduction of other odorous volatile organic compounds through diet modifications is promising. Use of synthetic amino acids with reduced intact protein levels in diets significantly reduces nitrogen excretions and odor production. Addition of nonstarch polysaccharides and specific oligosaccharides further alters the pathway of nitrogen excretion and reduces odor emission. Continued nutritional and microbial research to incorporate protein degradation products, especially sulfur-containing organics, with fermentable carbohydrates in the lower gastrointestinal tract of pigs will further control odors from manure.


Subject(s)
Animal Feed , Animal Husbandry/methods , Manure , Odorants , Swine , Animals , Dietary Carbohydrates , Feces/chemistry , Fermentation , Manure/analysis , Urine/chemistry
7.
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr ; 14(1): 47-52, 1990.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2109114

ABSTRACT

This study examined whether the increase in CO2 production (VCO2) and ventilatory demands by carbohydrate loading with different formulas during nighttime enteral feedings could be detrimental in young adult cystic fibrosis patients with moderate to advanced lung disease. Ten patients age 17 to 24 (mean 21.4 years) received 1000 kcal/M2 of a low (Pulmocare), medium (Ensure Plus), and high (Vivonex HN) carbohydrate formula in random order. Eight patients had severe, and two moderate obstructive pulmonary disease; nine used nighttime oxygen therapy. Basal energy expenditure (BEE) without feedings averaged 120% of that predicted by the Harris-Benedict equation. The metabolic expenditure by indirect calorimetry during nighttime feedings was 25 to 36% greater than the BEE. Oxygen consumption (VO2) increased 21 to 27% during nighttime feedings with no difference between formulas. VCO2 increased 29% for Pulmocare, 46% with Ensure Plus, and 53% with Vivonex HN. The increase in VCO2 with Pulmocare was significantly less than Ensure Plus (p less than 0.05) and Vivonex HN (p less than 0.005). The respiratory quotient (RQ) (VCO2-/VO2) for Pulmocare (0.88) was the same as the BEE, but increased with Ensure Plus (1.00), and Vivonex HN (1.08). The 41% increase in minute ventilation with Vivonex HN was greater than the 25 to 28% increase observed for Pulmocare and Ensure Plus (p less than 0.05). Transcutaneous oxygen saturation fell no more than 2% with all formulas. PCO2 changed +/- 5 torr during enteral feedings with similar changes in any patient with all formulas.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


Subject(s)
Cystic Fibrosis/therapy , Dietary Carbohydrates/administration & dosage , Enteral Nutrition , Food, Formulated , Adolescent , Adult , Basal Metabolism , Cystic Fibrosis/metabolism , Cystic Fibrosis/physiopathology , Female , Humans , Male , Oxygen Consumption , Oxygen Inhalation Therapy , Respiration , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL