ABSTRACT
AIMS: To assess the effects of 'clinical' and 'intensification inertia' by evaluating the impact of different intensification interventions on the probability of HbA1c goal attainment using real-world data. METHODS: Electronic health records (Cleveland Clinic, 2005-2016) were used to identify 7389 people with Type 2 diabetes mellitus and HbA1c ≥53 mmol/mol (≥7.0%), despite a stable regimen of two oral antihyperglycaemic drugs for ≥6 months. The participants were stratified by index HbA1c and analysed over a 6-month period for pharmacological intensification, and then for 12 additional months for HbA1c goal attainment (<53 mmol/mol). RESULTS: The probability of HbA1c goal attainment (Kaplan-Meier analysis) in the group with index HbA1c 53-63 mmol/mol (7.0-7.9%) was highest with the addition of oral antidiabetic drugs [57.3% (95% CI 52.1, 62.0)] or glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists [56.7% (95% CI 40.4, 68.6)], in the 64-74 mmol/mol (8.0-8.9%) group with the addition of oral antidiabetic drugs [31.9% (95% CI 25.1, 38.1)] or insulin [30.6% (95% CI 18.3, 41.0)], and in the ≥75 mmol/mol (≥9.0%) group with the addition of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists [53.0% (95% CI 31.8, 67.6)] or insulin [43.5% (95% CI 36.4, 49.8)]. CONCLUSIONS: Numerical, but not statistically significant, differences in HbA1c goal attainment probability by type of intensification were most marked in people with the highest index HbA1c [≥75 mmol/mol (≥9.0%)]; in this group, injectable therapy showed trends toward greater glycaemic control benefits. Additional research into the phenomenon of intensification inertia is warranted.
