A qualitative study investigating the views of stroke survivors and their family members on discussing post-stroke cognitive trajectories.

Cognitive impairment is common early after stroke but trajectories over the long term are variable. Some stroke survivors make a full recovery, while others retain a stable impairment or decline. This study explored the perceived advantages and disadvantages of discussing potential cognitive trajectories with stroke survivors and their family members. Stroke survivors at least six-months post-stroke were purposively sampled from an existing pool of research volunteers recruited originally for the OCS-Recovery study. They were invited, alongside a family member, to participate in a semi-structured interview. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. Twenty-six stroke survivors and eleven family members participated. We identified one overarching theme and three related subthemes. The overarching theme was: One size does not fit all. The subthemes were: (1) Hearing about potential cognitive trajectories helps to develop realistic expectations; (2) Discussions about cognitive trajectories may be motivating; (3) Cognitive decline and post-stroke dementia discussions may be anxiety-provoking and depressing. Healthcare professionals should adopt a person-centred approach to sharing information about post-stroke cognitive trajectories. Discussions should be tailored to individual needs and preferences, with dementia-related topics in particular addressed with the utmost selectivity and sensitivity.

Information needs of stroke survivors and their family members regarding post-stroke cognition: a scoping review protocol.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review is to map current evidence describing the information needs of stroke survivors and family members regarding cognition. INTRODUCTION: Managing cognitive changes is the most frequently reported unmet need among stroke survivors; hence, there is an urgent need to improve support for post-stroke cognitive impairment. While there is evidence that psychoeducation may help stroke survivors and their family members develop awareness about cognitive impairment and self-management strategies, it is unclear what information stroke survivors and their family members want to receive and how their needs change over time. INCLUSION CRITERIA: This review will consider peer-reviewed articles describing information needs relating to the following cognitive domains: memory, language, attention, executive function, praxis, and number processing. Stroke survivors and/or their family members must comprise at least 50% of the study population and must be aged at least 18 years. Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods studies will be included. METHODS: The review will be conducted in line with the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. A full literature search will be conducted in MEDLINE (PubMed), PsycINFO (Ovid), Embase, CINAHL (EBSCOhost), and Scopus using a search strategy developed in consultation with an expert university librarian. Articles will be screened by title, abstract, and full text; then, data will be extracted by 2 independent reviewers. The reference lists of included articles will be hand-searched for additional material. Data analysis and reporting will involve qualitative (textual narrative synthesis) and quantitative (descriptive statistics) methods.

Poststroke Executive Function in Relation to White Matter Damage on Clinically Acquired CT Brain Imaging.

BACKGROUND: Executive function (EF) impairments are prevalent post stroke and are associated with white matter (WM) damage on MRI. However, less is known about the relationship between poststroke EF and WM damage on CT imaging. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between poststroke EF and WM damage associated with stroke lesions and WM hypointensities (WMHs) on clinically acquired CT imaging. METHOD: This study analyzed data from the Oxford Cognitive Screening Program, which recruited individuals aged ≥18 years with a confirmed stroke from an acute stroke unit. The individuals completed a follow-up assessment 6 months post stroke. We included individuals with a CT scan showing a visible stroke who completed follow-up EF assessment using the Oxford Cognitive Screen-Plus rule-finding task. We manually delineated stroke lesions and quantified then dichotomized WM damage caused by the stroke using the HCP-842 atlas. We visually rated then dichotomized WMHs using the Age-Related White Matter Changes Scale. RESULTS: Among 87 stroke survivors (M age = 73.60 ± 11.75; 41 female; 61 ischemic stroke), multivariable linear regression showed that stroke damage to the medial lemniscus ( B = -8.86, P < 0.001) and the presence of WMHs ( B = -5.42, P = 0.005) were associated with poorer EF 6 months post stroke after adjusting for covariates including age and education. CONCLUSION: Poorer EF was associated with WM damage caused by stroke lesions and WMHs on CT. These results confirm the importance of WM integrity for EF post stroke and demonstrate the prognostic utility of CT-derived imaging markers for poststroke cognitive outcomes.

Reliability of the global cortical atrophy visual rating scale applied to computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging scans in acute stroke.

INTRODUCTION: Research using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) suggests regional cerebral atrophy measures (e.g., frontal lobe, temporal lobe) may predict post-stroke outcomes. Clinical CT scans have excellent potential for use in research but it is unclear whether regional atrophy measures from CT are reliable compared to MRI reference standards. METHODS: We used the Global Cortical Atrophy (GCA) scale to investigate reliability of atrophy measures on CT versus MRI scans from stroke patients originally recruited to the Oxford Cognitive Screening programme. Two raters provided standardised visual ratings at two timepoints. Weighted Kappa statistics assessed the reliability of regional atrophy scores. Spearman's correlation and a two-way repeated measures ANOVA assessed the reliability of the total score. RESULTS: On clinically acquired neuroimaging from 98 stroke patients (mean/SD age = 70.97/11.99, 42 female, 84 ischaemic stroke), regional GCA scores on CT versus MRI showed fair to almost perfect intra-rater agreement (κ = .50-.87), substantial to almost perfect intra-rater agreement on CT (κ = .67-.88), and moderate to almost perfect intra-rater reliability on MRI (κ = .50-.89). Regional GCA scores showed mostly moderate to substantial inter-rater reliability on both CT and MRI (κ = .43-.69), except the temporal horns and parieto-occipital region. There was a strong correlation between total GCA scores on CT and MRI (r (96) = .87-.88, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: These results support the use of cerebral atrophy measures from CT in clinical research, as visual ratings showed generally good agreement between CT and MRI, between raters, and between timepoints.

Association of Neuroimaging Markers on Clinical CT Scans With Domain-Specific Cognitive Impairment in the Early and Later Poststroke Stages.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Poststroke cognitive impairment (PSCI) is associated with neuroimaging markers, including cortical atrophy and white matter lesions (WMLs), on clinically acquired CT neuroimaging. The objective was to investigate the association between cortical atrophy/WMLs and PSCI in specific cognitive domains in the acute/subacute and chronic stages after stroke, to provide clarity on the relationship between these neuroimaging markers and the temporal evolution of PSCI. METHODS: We visually assessed cortical atrophy using the Global Cortical Atrophy (GCA) scale and WMLs using the Fazekas scale. Oxford Cognitive Screen or Birmingham Cognitive Screen assessed PSCI at 2 time points (acute/subacute and chronic) in 6 domains (language, memory, number processing, executive function, attention, and praxis). We binarized domain-specific performance as impaired/unimpaired using normative cutoffs. Multivariable linear and logistic regression analyses evaluated associations between GCA/Fazekas scores with acute/subacute and chronic global and domain-specific PSCI, and ANCOVAs examined whether these scores were significantly different in patients with recovered vs persistent PSCI. Age, sex, education, NIHSS, lesion volume, and recurrent stroke were covariates in these analyses. RESULTS: Among 411 stroke patients (Mdn/IQR age = 76.16/66.84-83.47; 193 female; 346 ischemic stroke; 107 recurrent stroke), GCA and Fazekas scores were not associated with global cognitive impairment in the acute/subacute stage after stroke, but GCA score was associated with chronic global PSCI (B = 0.01, p < 0.001, 95% CI 0.00-0.01). In domain-specific analyses, GCA score was associated with chronic impairment in the memory (B = 0.06, p < 0.001, 95% CI 0.03-0.10) and attention (B = 0.05, p = 0.003, 95% CI 0.02-0.09) domains, and in patients with persistent PSCI, these domains showed significantly higher GCA scores than patients who had recovered (memory: F(1, 157) = 6.63, p = 0.01, η 2 G = 0.04; attention: F(1, 268) = 10.66, p = 0.001, η 2 G = 0.04). DISCUSSION: This study highlights the potential effect of cortical atrophy on the cognitive recovery process after stroke and demonstrates the prognostic utility of CT neuroimaging for poststroke cognitive outcomes. Clinical neuroimaging could help identify patients at long-term risk of PSCI during acute hospitalization.

Cognitive assessment after stroke: A qualitative study of patients' experiences.

OBJECTIVES: Clinical guidelines recommend early cognitive assessment after stroke to inform rehabilitation and discharge decisions. However, little is known about stroke survivors' experiences of the cognitive assessment process. This qualitative study aimed to explore patients' experiences of poststroke cognitive assessments. DESIGN: Stroke survivors were purposively sampled in an iterative process through a pool of research volunteers who had previously taken part in the Oxford Cognitive Screen Recovery study. Stroke survivors and their family caregivers were invited to participate in a semistructured interview steered by a topic guide. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Demographic, clinical and cognitive data were acquired from patients' previous research data. SETTING: Stroke survivors were originally recruited from the acute inpatient unit at Oxford University Hospital (John Radcliffe), UK. Participants were interviewed after discharge either at their homes or via telephone or videocall. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-six stroke survivors and eleven caregivers participated in semi-structured interviews. RESULTS: We identified three key phases of the cognitive assessment process and themes pertaining to each phase. The phases (numbered) and themes (lettered) were as follows: (1) before the cognitive assessment: (A) lack of explanation, (B) considering the assessment useless; (2) during the cognitive assessment: varied emotional responses, moderated by (D) perception of the purpose behind cognitive assessment, (E) perception of cognitive impairment, (F) confidence in cognitive abilities, (G) assessment administration style and (3) after the cognitive assessment: (H) feedback can impact self-confidence and self-efficacy, (I) vague feedback and clinical jargon are unhelpful. CONCLUSIONS: Stroke survivors require clear explanations about the purpose and outcomes of poststroke cognitive assessments, including constructive feedback, to promote engagement with the process and protect their psychological wellbeing.

Validation of the UK English Oxford cognitive screen-plus in sub-acute and chronic stroke survivors.

Introduction: Stroke survivors are routinely screened for cognitive impairment with tools that often fail to detect subtle impairments. The Oxford Cognitive Screen-Plus (OCS-Plus) is a brief tablet-based screen designed to detect subtle post-stroke cognitive impairments. We examined its psychometric properties in two UK English-speaking stroke cohorts (subacute: <3 months post-stroke, chronic: >6 months post-stroke) cross-sectionally. Patients and methods: This study included 347 stroke survivors (mean age = 73 years; mean education = 13 years; 43.06% female; 74.42% ischaemic stroke). The OCS-Plus was completed by 181 sub-acute stroke survivors and 166 chronic stroke survivors. All participants also completed the Oxford Cognitive Screen (OCS) and a subset completed the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and further neuropsychological tests. Results: First, convergent construct validity of OCS-Plus tasks to task-matched standardized neuropsychological tests was confirmed (r > 0.30). Second, we evaluated divergent construct validity of all OCS-Plus subtasks (r < 0.19). Third, we report the sensitivity and specificity of each OCS-Plus subtask compared to neuropsychological test performance. Fourth, we found that OCS-Plus detected cognitive impairments in a large proportion of those classed as unimpaired on MoCA (100%) and OCS (98.50%). Discussion and conclusion: The OCS-Plus provides a valid screening tool for sensitive detection of subtle cognitive impairment in stroke patients. Indeed, the OCS-Plus detected subtle cognitive impairment at a similar level to validated neuropsychological assessments and exceeded detection of cognitive impairment compared to standard clinical screening tools.

Familiarity is familiarity is familiarity: Event-related brain potentials reveal qualitatively similar representations of personally familiar and famous faces.

Humans excel in familiar face recognition, but often find it hard to make identity judgements of unfamiliar faces. Understanding of the factors underlying the substantial benefits of familiarity is at present limited, but the effect is sometimes qualified by the way in which a face is known-for example, personal acquaintance sometimes gives rise to stronger familiarity effects than exposure through the media. Given the different quality of personal versus media knowledge, for example in one's emotional response or level of interaction, some have suggested qualitative differences between representations of people known personally or from media exposure. Alternatively, observed differences could reflect quantitative differences in the level of familiarity. We present 4 experiments investigating potential contributory influences to face familiarity effects in which observers view pictures showing their friends, favorite celebrities, celebrities they dislike, celebrities about whom they have expressed no opinion, and their own face. Using event-related potential indices with high temporal resolution and multiple highly varied everyday ambient images as a strong test of face recognition, we focus on the N250 and the later Sustained Familiarity Effect (SFE). All known faces show qualitatively similar responses relative to unfamiliar faces. Regardless of personal- or media-based familiarity, N250 reflects robust visual representations, successively refined over increasing exposure, while SFE appears to reflect the amount of identity-specific semantic information known about a person. These modulations of visual and semantic representations are consistent with face recognition models which emphasize the degree of familiarity but do not distinguish between different types of familiarity. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).