Sudden, unexpected cardiac or unexplained death in England: a national survey.

BACKGROUND: Post-mortem examinations of adults who were apparently healthy but died suddenly and unexpectedly sometimes reveal no morphological abnormalities to explain their deaths. The frequency of such unexplained deaths in relation to other causes of sudden cardiac death is not known. AIM: To estimate the frequency of sudden unexpected cardiac or unexplained death in England. DESIGN: Prospective survey using a stratified random sample of 83 of the 132 H.M. Coroner's jurisdictions in England. METHODS: Consecutive White Caucasians, aged 16-64 years, with no medical history of cardiac disease, seen alive within 12 h of death, on whom autopsy found either a cardiac or no identifiable cause of death, were included. The coroner's officer sent a copy of the post-mortem report and a completed case registration form to the investigators, with tissue samples. RESULTS: Sixty-seven (81%) coroners participated, each maintaining prospective surveillance for 4 months. Of 692 ascertained cases, case registration forms were received for 650 (94%), post-mortem reports for 682 (99%), blood samples for 569 (82%), myocardial slices for 517 (75%) and whole hearts for 47 (7%). In cases with myocardial tissue, death was ascribed to ischaemic heart disease in 465 (82.4%). In 43.1% the ischaemia was acute, in 19.1% there was myocardial scarring but no acute ischaemia, and 20.2% had coronary atheroma only. Death was due to left ventricular hypertrophy in 32 (5.7%), to other cardiac causes in 30 (5.3%) and in 23 (4.1%) there was no clear cause. Those with cardiac causes were 81% male, median ages 55.9 (male) and 56.6 (female) years. The 23 unexplained deaths were 57% female, median ages 40.5 (male) and 54.9 (female) years. The estimated annual frequency of sudden unexpected death due to cardiac or unidentified causes, in English adults of employment age, was 11/100,000 (3481 annual deaths). DISCUSSION: In 4.1% of sudden unexpected deaths under 65 years, no cause was found. Until it becomes accepted practice to identify these cases by a name, such as Sudden Adult Death Syndrome (SADS), it will not be possible to study their aetiology systematically.

A British Cardiac Society survey of the potential for the secondary prevention of coronary disease: ASPIRE (Action on Secondary Prevention through Intervention to Reduce Events).

OBJECTIVE: To measure the potential for secondary prevention of coronary disease in the United Kingdom. DESIGN: Cross sectional survey of a representative sample of coronary patients from a retrospective review of hospital medical records and patient interview and examination. SETTING: Stratified random sample of 12 specialist cardiac centres and 12 district general hospitals drawn from 34 specialist cardiac centres and 261 district general hospitals in 12 geographic areas in the United Kingdom. SUBJECTS: 2583 patients < or = 70 yr; 25 consecutive males and 25 consecutive females identified retrospectively in each of four diagnostic categories: coronary artery bypass grafting, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, acute myocardial infarction, and acute myocardial ischaemia without evidence of infarction. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Risk factor recording and management in medical records; the prevalence and control of risk factors at interview six months after the procedure or event. RESULTS: Recording of coronary risk factors in patient's records was incomplete and this varied by risk factor. Smoking habit and blood pressure were most completely recorded, whereas a history of hyperlipidaemia and blood cholesterol concentrations were least complete. Risk factor records were more likely to be complete in cardiac centres than in district hospitals. At interview 10% to 27% of patients were still smoking cigarettes and 75% remained overweight, females more severely so. Up to a quarter of patients remained hypertensive, males more severely so than females. Over three quarters had a total cholesterol > 5.2 mmol/l. In patients on medication for blood pressure, cholesterol or glucose, risk factor profiles were little better than in those who were not. Only about one patient in three was taking a beta blocker after infarction. Up to a fifth of patients who had had acute myocardial ischaemia were not taking aspirin at follow up. CONCLUSIONS: There is considerable potential to reduce the risk of a further major ischaemic event in patients with established coronary disease. This can be achieved by effective lifestyle intervention, the rigorous management of blood pressure and cholesterol, and the appropriate use of prophylactic drugs.