Pilot randomized trial of an electronic symptom monitoring intervention for hospitalized patients with cancer.

BACKGROUND: Hospitalized patients with cancer experience a high symptom burden, which is associated with poor health outcomes and increased health care utilization. However, studies investigating symptom monitoring interventions in this population are lacking. We conducted a pilot randomized trial to assess the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a symptom monitoring intervention to improve symptom management in hospitalized patients with advanced cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We randomly assigned patients with advanced cancer who were admitted to the inpatient oncology service to a symptom monitoring intervention or usual care. Patients in both arms self-reported their symptoms daily (Edmonton Symptom Assessment System and Patient Health Questionnaire-4). Patients assigned to the intervention had their symptom reports presented graphically with alerts for moderate/severe symptoms during daily team rounds. The primary end point of the study was feasibility. We defined the intervention as feasible if >75% of participants hospitalized >2 days completed >2 symptom reports. We observed daily rounds to determine whether clinicians discussed and developed a plan to address patients' symptoms. We used regression models to assess intervention effects on patients' symptoms throughout their hospitalization, readmission risk, and hospital length of stay (LOS). RESULTS: Among 150 enrolled patients (81.1% enrollment), 94.2% completed >2 symptom reports. Clinicians discussed 60.4% of the symptom reports and developed a plan to address the symptoms highlighted by the symptom reports 20.8% of the time. Compared with usual care, intervention patients had a greater proportion of days with lower psychological distress (B = 0.12, P = 0.008), but no significant difference in the proportion of days with improved Edmonton Symptom Assessment System-physical symptoms (B = 0.07, P = 0.138). Intervention patients had lower readmission risk (hazard ratio = 0.68, P = 0.224), although this difference was not significant. We found no significant intervention effects on hospital LOS (B = 0.16, P = 0.862). CONCLUSIONS: This symptom monitoring intervention is feasible and demonstrates encouraging preliminary efficacy for improving patients' symptoms and readmission risk.ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02891993.

Evaluation of the addition of rituximab to CODOX-M/IVAC for Burkitt's lymphoma: a retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: Burkitt's lymphoma (BL) is a highly aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) that may be cured with intensive chemotherapy. The addition of the CD20-directed monoclonal antibody rituximab to CODOX-M/IVAC (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and high-dose methotrexate, alternating with ifosfamide, etoposide, and cytarabine) has not been studied despite efficacy in other aggressive CD20-positive NHLs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighty adult BL patients treated with or without rituximab were identified at our institutions. Response rate, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) are calculated. RESULTS: There were fewer relapses in rituximab-treated patients (3 of 40 versus 13 of 40, P = 0.01). There was a trend for improvement in outcome favoring rituximab-containing therapy, with 3-year PFS (74% versus 61%) and 3-year OS (77% versus 66%), although these did not reach statistical significance. Advanced age and central nervous system involvement were associated with poorer OS on multivariable Cox regression analysis, adjusting for treatment, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) involvement, and risk group. CONCLUSIONS: CODOX-M/IVAC, with or without rituximab, is a highly effective regimen for the treatment of adult BL. Rituximab decreased the recurrence rate and showed a trend in favor of improvement in PFS and OS. HIV-infected patients achieved outcomes comparable with those of their non-HIV-infected counterparts.

End-of-treatment but not interim PET scan predicts outcome in nonbulky limited-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: Early interim positron emission tomography (PET) scans appear powerfully predictive of outcome in Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL), particularly in advanced-stage disease where it has been predominantly studied. The prognostic value of interim PET in limited-stage patients with nonbulky disease has not been well established. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ninety-six patients with nonbulky limited-stage HL were identified who had interim and end-of-treatment PET scans. Response rate, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated. RESULTS: Four-year PFS and OS for the entire cohort were 88% and 97%, respectively. Interim PET did not predict outcome, with PFS in positive and negative patients 87% versus 91% (P=0.57), respectively. End-of-treatment PET result was predictive of outcome, with PFS of 94% in end PET-negative patients versus 54% in end PET-positive patients (P<0.0001). Four-year OS was 100% in end PET-negative patients and 84% in end PET-positive patients (P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Interim PET scans were not predictive of outcome, compared with scans carried out at completion of therapy. End-of-treatment PET was highly predictive of PFS and OS, regardless of interim PET result. In this low-risk patient population, even patients with interim positive PET scans show a favorable prognosis.

Partial CD8+ T-cell depletion of allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation is insufficient to prevent graft-versus-host disease.

Prior studies suggest that depletion of CD8+ T cells from donor bone marrow or donor lymphocyte infusions can reduce graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) without compromising graft-versus-leukemia. We explored CD8 depletion in patients undergoing matched related donor (MRD, n=25) and unrelated donor (URD, n=16) peripheral blood stem cell transplantation following myeloablative conditioning with cyclophosphamide (60 mg/kg/day i.v. x 2) and total body irradiation (200 cGy x 7 fractions). Ex vivo incubation of mobilized donor peripheral blood cells with anti-CD8 antibody coated high-density microparticles removed 99% of CD8+ cells. The median number of CD8+ cells infused was 3.9 x 10(5) cells/kg (2.2 x 10(5) in MRD, and 8.1 x 10(5) in URD patients). Post transplant immune suppression included tacrolimus in the MRD cohort, and tacrolimus plus mini-methotrexate (5 mg/m2 days +1, 3, 6, 11) in the URD cohort. All 41 patients engrafted. Grade 2-4 acute GVHD incidence was 61% (44% MRD, 88% URD). Chronic GVHD incidence was 50% (48% MRD, 55% URD). Relapse incidence was 4.9%. Estimated event-free and overall survival rates were 65 and 63%, respectively, at 1 year and 56 and 57%, respectively, at 2 years. There was no correlation between CD8+ number and GVHD or survival. A 2-log depletion of CD8+ cells from PBSC is insufficient to prevent GVHD.

Quantitation of T-cell neogenesis in vivo after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation in adults.

Following myeloablative therapy, it is unknown to what extent age-dependent thymic involution limits the generation of new T cells with a diverse repertoire. Normal T-cell receptor gene rearrangement in T-cell progenitors results in the generation of T-cell receptor rearrangement excision circles (TRECs). In this study, a quantitative assay for TRECs was used to measure T-cell neogenesis in adult patients with leukemia who received myeloablative therapy followed by transplantation of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cells. Although phenotypically mature T cells had recovered by 1 to 2 months after bone marrow transplantation (BMT), TREC levels remained low for 3 months after BMT. T-cell neogenesis became evident by 6 months, and normal levels of adult thymic function were restored at 6 to 12 months after BMT. Subsequent leukemia relapse in some patients was associated with reduced TREC levels, but infusion of mature donor CD4(+) T cells resulted in rapid restoration of thymic function. These studies demonstrate that T-cell neogenesis contributes to immune reconstitution in adult patients and suggest that thymic function can be manipulated in vivo. (Blood. 2001;98:1116-1121)

Recovery and nonmonotone masking effects.

Recovery was produced by a homogeneous flash of light (M2). With M2 absent, correct letter report was a U-shaped curve when plotted against the interval separating the onset of a letter target and the onset of a patterned masking stimulus (M1). With the homogeneous flash of light ed to the stimulus sequence (target + M1 + M2), recovery occurred for all the shortest delays between the onsets of target and M1. Recovery peaked at a constant separation between the onsets of the target and M2, regardless, of the separation between the onsets of the target and M1. Current explanations of recovery cannot account for this result.