Thoracentesis techniques: A literature review.

Thoracentesis is performed by 4 methods: gravity, manual aspiration, vacuum-bottle suction, and wall suction. This literature review investigates the safety of these techniques and determines if there is significant difference in complication rates. A comprehensive literature search revealed 6 articles studying thoracentesis techniques and their complication rates, reviewing 20,815 thoracenteses: 80 (0.4%) by gravity, 9431 (45.3%) by manual aspiration, 3498 (16.8%) by vacuum-bottle suction, 7580 (36.4%) by wall suction and 226 (1.1%) unspecified. Of the 6 studies, 2 were smaller with 100 and 140 patients respectively. Overall, there was a 4.4% complication rate including hemothoraces, pneumothoraces, re-expansion pulmonary edema (REPE), chest discomfort, bleeding at the site, pain, and vasovagal episodes. The pneumothorax and REPE rate was 2.5%. Sub-analyzed by each method, there was a 47.5% (38/80) complication rate in the gravity group, 1.2% (115/9431) in the manual aspiration group including 0.7% pneumothorax or REPE, 8% (285/3498) in the vacuum-bottle group including 3.7% pneumothorax or REPE, 4% (309/7580) in the wall suction group all of which were either pneumothorax or REPE, and 73% (166/226) in the unspecified group most of which were vasovagal episodes. Procedure duration was less in the suction groups versus gravity drainage. The 2 smaller studies indicated that in the vacuum groups, early procedure termination rate from respiratory failure was significantly higher than non-vacuum techniques. Significant complication rate from thoracentesis by any technique is low. Suction drainage was noted to have a lower procedure time. Symptom-limited thoracentesis is safe using vacuum or wall suction even with large volumes drained. Other factors such as procedure duration, quantity of fluid removed, number of needle passes, patients' BMI, and operator technique may have more of an impact on complication rate than drainage modality. All suction modalities of drainage seem to be safe. Operator technique, attention to symptom development, amount of fluid removed, and intrapleural pressure changes may be important in predicting complication development, and therefore, may be useful in choosing which technique to employ. Specific drainage modes and their complications need to be further studied.

Unveiling the Unexpected: Why Doctors Should Look beyond the Lungs when Predicting COVID-19 Mortality.

INTRODUCTION: The main objective of this study was to identify the best combination of admission day parameters for predicting COVID-19 mortality in hospitalized patients. Furthermore, we sought to compare the predictive capacity of pulmonary parameters to that of renal parameters for mortality from COVID-19. METHODS: In this retrospective study, all patients admitted to a tertiary hospital between September 1st, 2020, and December 31st, 2020, who were clinically symptomatic and tested positive for COVID-19, were included. We gathered extensive data on patient admissions, including laboratory results, comorbidities, chest X-ray (CXR) images, and SpO2 levels, to determine their role in predicting mortality. Experienced radiologists evaluated the CXR images and assigned a score from 0 to 18 based on the severity of COVID-19 pneumonia. Further, we categorized patients into two independent groups based on their renal function using the RIFLE and KDIGO criteria to define the acute kidney injury (AKI) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) groups. The first group ("AKI&CKD") was subdivided into six subgroups: normal renal function (A); CKD grade 2+3a (B); AKI-DROP (C); CKD grade 3b (D); AKI-RISE (E); and grade 4 + 5 CKD (F). The second group was based only on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at the admission, and thus it was divided into four grades: grade 1, grade 2+3a, grade 3b, and grade 4 + 5. RESULTS: The cohort comprised 619 patients. Patients who died during hospitalization had a significantly higher mean radiological score compared to those who survived, with a p value <0.01. Moreover, we observed that the risk for mortality was significantly increased as renal function deteriorated, as evidenced by the AKI&CKD and eGFR groups (p < 0.001 for each group). Regarding mortality prediction, the area under the curve (AUC) for renal parameters (AKI&CKD group, eGFR group, and age) was found to be superior to that of pulmonary parameters (age, radiological score, SpO2, CRP, and D-dimer) with an AUC of 0.8068 versus 0.7667. However, when renal and pulmonary parameters were combined, the AUC increased to 0.8813. Optimal parameter combinations for predicting mortality from COVID-19 were identified for three medical settings: Emergency Medical Service (EMS), the Emergency Department, and the Internal Medicine Floor. The AUC for these settings was 0.7874, 0.8614, and 0.8813, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that selected renal parameters are superior to pulmonary parameters in predicting COVID-19 mortality for patients requiring hospitalization. When combining both renal and pulmonary factors, the predictive ability of mortality significantly improved. Additionally, we identified the optimal combination of factors for mortality prediction in three distinct settings: EMS, Emergency Department, and Internal Medicine Floor.

Gene Therapy with p14/tBID Induces Selective and Synergistic Apoptosis in Mutant Ras and Mutant p53 Cancer Cells In Vitro and In Vivo.

Any gene therapy for cancer will be predicated upon its selectivity against cancer cells and non-toxicity to normal cells. Therefore, safeguards are needed to prevent its activation in normal cells. We designed a minimal p14ARF promoter with upstream Ap1 and E2F enhancer elements and a downstream MDR1 inhibitory element, TATA box, and a transcription initiation site (hereafter p14ARFmin). The modified p14ARFmin promoter was linked to bicistronic P14 and truncated BID (tBID) genes, which led to synergistic apoptosis via the intrinsic and extrinsic pathways of apoptosis when expressed. The promoter was designed to be preferentially activated by mutant Ras and completely inhibited by wild-type p53 so that only cells with both mutant Ras and mutant p53 would activate the construct. In comparison to most p53 gene therapies, this construct has selective advantages: (1) p53-based gene therapies with a constitutive CMV promoter cannot differentiate between normal cells and cancer cells, and can be toxic to normal cells; (2) our construct does not induce p21WAF/CIPI in contrast to other p53-based gene therapies, which can induce cell cycle arrest leading to increased chemotherapy resistance; (3) the modified construct (p14ARFmin-p14-tBID) demonstrates bidirectional control of its promoter, which is completely repressed by wild-type p53 and activated only in cells with both RAS and P53 mutations; and (4) a novel combination of genes (p14 and tBID) can synergistically induce potent intrinsic and extrinsic apoptosis in cancer cells.

C-Terminal p53 Palindromic Tetrapeptide Restores Full Apoptotic Function to Mutant p53 Cancer Cells In Vitro and In Vivo.

We previously demonstrated that a synthetic monomer peptide derived from the C-terminus of p53 (aa 361−382) induced preferential apoptosis in mutant p53 malignant cells, but not normal cells. The major problem with the peptide was its short half-life (half-life < 10 min.) due to a random coil topology found in 3D proton NMR spectroscopy studies. To induce secondary/tertiary structures to produce more stability, we developed a peptide modelled after the tetrameric structure of p53 essential for activation of target genes. Starting with the above monomer peptide (aa 361−382), we added the nuclear localization sequence of p53 (aa 353−360) and the end of the C-terminal sequence (aa 383−393), resulting in a monomer spanning aa 353−393. Four monomers were linked by glycine to maximize flexibility and in a palindromic order that mimics p53 tetramer formation with four orthogonal alpha helices, which is required for p53 transactivation of target genes. This is now known as the 4 repeat-palindromic-p53 peptide or (4R-Pal-p53p). We explored two methods for testing the activity of the palindromic tetrapeptide: (1) exogenous peptide with a truncated antennapedia carrier (Ant) and (2) a doxycycline (Dox) inducer for endogenous expression. The exogenous peptide, 4R-Pal-p53p-Ant, contained a His tag at the N-terminal and a truncated 17aa Ant at the C-terminal. Exposure of human breast cancer MB-468 cells and human skin squamous cell cancer cells (both with mutant p53, 273 Arg->His) with purified peptide at 7 µM and 15 µM produced 52% and 75%, cell death, respectively. Comparatively, the monomeric p53 C-terminal peptide-Ant (aa 361−382, termed p53p-Ant), at 15 µM and 30 µM induced 15% and 24% cell death, respectively. Compared to the p53p-Ant, the exogenous 4R-pal-p53p-Ant was over five-fold more potent for inducing apoptosis at an equimolar concentration (15 µM). Endogenous 4R-Pal-p53p expression (without Ant), induced by Dox, resulted in 43% cell death in an engineered MB468 breast cancer stable cell line, while endogenous p53 C-terminal monomeric peptide expression produced no cell death due to rapid peptide degradation. The mechanism of apoptosis from 4R-Pal-p53p involved the extrinsic and intrinsic pathways (FAS, caspase-8, Bax, PUMA) for apoptosis, as well as increasing reactive oxygen species (ROS). All three death pathways were induced from transcriptional/translational activation of pro-apoptotic genes. Additionally, mRNA of p53 target genes (Bax and Fas) increased 14-fold and 18-fold, respectively, implying that the 4R-Pal-p53p restored full apoptotic potential to mutant p53. Monomeric p53p only increased Fas expression without a transcriptional or translational increase in Fas, and other genes and human marrow stem cell studies revealed no toxicity to normal stem cells for granulocytes, erythrocytes, monocytes, and macrophages (CFU-GEMM). Additionally, the peptide specifically targeted pre-malignant and malignant cells with mutant p53 and was not toxic to normal cells with basal levels of WT p53.