Failure of dry mist of hydrogen peroxide 5% to kill Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

A dry mist of hydrogen peroxide (DMHP; Sterinis), was used to test for surface decontamination of air-dried samples of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, 3 x 10(5) cfu/mL in open plastic trays. No significant decontamination effect of DMHP could be observed after three ordinary cycles with hydrogen peroxide or after doubling the effect with six repeated cycles.

Rapid MRSA test in exposed persons: costs and savings in hospitals.

OBJECTIVE: To study a rapid Xpert polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method in detecting methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in patients and healthcare workers (HCW) exposed to MRSA, and to estimate savings associated to isolation or work restriction. METHODS: A test set of four double (one for the growth and one for the rapid test) pre-wet swabs from the nose, throat, hands/wrists and perineum was studied by a growth method and by the Xpert MRSA test. RESULTS: The total correspondence between the growth and the rapid test was 92.8%. The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were for the Xpert MRSA test: 87%, 99.6%, 68.5% and 99.9%, and for the growth test: 76%, 100%, 100%, and 99.8%, assuming a prevalence of MRSA of 0.01%. Among the MRSA positive persons, the Xpert and growth tests detected MRSA in 44.6% and 40% of nose samples, respectively, 38.2% and 45.5% throat samples, 30.8% and 11.5% hands/wrists samples, 44% and 38% perineum samples, and in 81.8% and 77.3% wound samples, respectively. By combining four anatomical sites, the detection rate increased to 87.5% by both methods. The cost for each Xpert and growth test was euro50 and euro6.25, respectively. The rapid test would save at least euro925 per exposed HCW and euro550 per patient that were MRSA negative. CONCLUSION: The MRSA Xpert test is easy to perform, has a high negative predictive value, and may be used to control healthcare workers and patients exposed to MRSA. Sampling from multiple anatomical locations is recommended. Still, more then 10% of MRSA positive cases may not be found.

Decontamination of rooms, medical equipment and ambulances using an aerosol of hydrogen peroxide disinfectant.

A programmable device (Sterinis, Gloster Sante Europe) providing a dry fume of 5% hydrogen peroxide (H(2)O(2)) disinfectant was tested for decontamination of rooms, ambulances and different types of medical equipment. Pre-set concentrations were used according to the volumes of the rooms and garages. Three cycles were performed with increasing contact times. Repetitive experiments were performed using Bacillus atrophaeus (formerly Bacillus subtilis) Raven 1162282 spores to control the effect of decontamination; after a sampling plan, spore strips were placed in various positions in rooms, ambulances, and inside and outside the items of medical equipment. Decontamination was effective in 87% of 146 spore tests in closed test rooms and in 100% of 48 tests in a surgical department when using three cycles. One or two cycles had no effect. The sporicidal effect on internal parts of the medical equipment was only 62.3% (220 tests). When the devices were run and ventilated during decontamination, 100% (57/57) of spore strips placed inside were decontaminated. In the ambulances, the penetration of H(2)O(2) into equipment, devices, glove boxes, under mattresses, and the drivers' cabins was 100% (60/60 tests) when using three cycles, but was less effective when using one or two cycles. In conclusion, an H(2)O(2) dry fumigation system, run in three cycles, seemed to have a good sporicidal effect when used in rooms, ambulances, and external and internal parts of ventilated equipment. Further studies need to be performed concerning concentration, contact time and the number of cycles of H(2)O(2). This is especially important for inner parts of medical equipment that cannot be ventilated during the decontamination process.