Pooled safety analysis from phase III studies of trifluridine/tipiracil in patients with metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer and metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) showed clinical benefit, including improved survival and manageable safety in previously treated patients with metastatic colorectal (mCRC) or gastric/gastroesophageal junction (mGC/GEJC) cancer in the phase III RECOURSE and TAGS trials, respectively. A pooled analysis was conducted to further characterize FTD/TPI safety, including management of haematologic toxicities and use in patients with renal or hepatic impairment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Adults with ≥2 prior regimens for advanced mGC/GEJC or mCRC were randomized (2 : 1) to FTD/TPI [35 mg/m2 twice daily days 1-5 and 8-12 (28-day cycle); same dosage in both trials] or placebo plus best supportive care. Adverse events (AEs) were summarized in the safety population (patients who received ≥1 dose) and analysed by renal/hepatic function. RESULTS: TAGS and RECOURSE included 335 and 533 FTD/TPI-treated and 168 and 265 placebo-treated patients, respectively. Overall safety of FTD/TPI was similar in TAGS and RECOURSE. Haematologic (neutropenia, anaemia) and gastrointestinal (nausea, diarrhoea) AEs were most commonly observed. Laboratory-assessed grade 3-4 neutropenia occurred in 37% (TAGS)/38% (RECOURSE) of FTD/TPI-treated patients (median onset: 29 days/55 days), and 96% (TAGS)/97% (RECOURSE) of cases resolved regardless of renal/hepatic function. Supportive medications for neutropenia were received by 17% (TAGS) and 9% (RECOURSE); febrile neutropenia was reported in 2% and 4%, respectively. Overall grade ≥3 AEs were more frequent in patients with moderate renal impairment [81% (TAGS); 85% (RECOURSE)] versus normal renal function (74%; 67%); anaemia and neutropenia were more common in patients with renal impairment. FTD/TPI safety (including haematologic AEs) was consistent across patients with normal and mildly impaired hepatic function. CONCLUSIONS: These results support FTD/TPI as a well-tolerated treatment in patients with mGC/GEJC or mCRC, with a consistent safety profile. Safety was largely similar in patients with normal or mildly impaired renal/hepatic function; however, patients with renal impairment should be monitored for haematologic toxicities.

Neutropenia and survival outcomes in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with trifluridine/tipiracil in the RECOURSE and J003 trials.

BACKGROUND: The phase II J003 (N = 169) and phase III RECOURSE (N = 800) trials demonstrated a significant improvement in survival with trifluridine (FTD)/tipiracil (TPI) versus placebo in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. This post hoc analysis investigated pharmacokinetic data of FTD/TPI exposure and pharmacodynamic markers, such as chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) and clinical outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 210 patients from RECOURSE were enrolled in this substudy. A limited sampling approach was used, with three pharmacokinetic samples drawn on day 12 of cycle 1. Patients were categorized as being above or below the median area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) for FTD and TPI. We conducted a post hoc analysis using the entire RECOURSE population to determine the correlations between CIN and clinical outcome. We then carried out a similar analysis on the J003 trial to validate the results. RESULTS: In the RECOURSE subset, patients in the high FTD AUC group had a significantly increased CIN risk. Analyses of the entire population demonstrated that FTD/TPI-treated patients with CIN of any grade in cycles 1 and 2 had significantly longer median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) than patients who did not develop CIN and patients in the placebo group. Patients who required an FTD/TPI treatment delay had increased OS and PFS versus those in the placebo group and those who did not develop CIN. Similar results were obtained in the J003 cohort. CONCLUSIONS: In RECOURSE, patients with higher FTD drug exposure had an increased CIN risk. FTD/TPI-treated patients who developed CIN had improved OS and PFS versus those in the placebo group and those who did not develop CIN. Similar findings were reported in the J003 cohort, thus validating the RECOURSE results. The occurrence of CIN may be a useful predictor of treatment outcomes for FTD/TPI-treated patients. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT01607957 (RECOURSE). JAPAN PHARMACEUTICAL INFORMATION CENTER NUMBER: JapicCTI-090880 (J003).

Phase I study of olaparib plus gemcitabine in patients with advanced solid tumours and comparison with gemcitabine alone in patients with locally advanced/metastatic pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: Olaparib (Lynparza) is an oral poly(adenosine diphosphate [ADP]-ribose) polymerase inhibitor that induces synthetic lethality in cancers with homologous recombination defects. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this phase I, dose-escalation trial, patients with advanced solid tumours received olaparib (50-200 mg capsules b.i.d.) continuously or intermittently (days 1-14, per 28-day cycle) plus gemcitabine [i.v. 600-800 mg/m(2); days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (cycle 1), days 1, 8, and 15 (subsequent cycles)] to establish the maximum tolerated dose. A separate dose-escalation phase evaluated olaparib in tablet formulation (100 mg o.d./b.i.d.; days 1-14) plus gemcitabine (600 mg/m(2)). In an expansion phase, patients with genetically unselected locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer were randomised 2 : 1 to the tolerated olaparib capsule combination dose or gemcitabine alone (1000 mg/m(2)). RESULTS: Sixty-six patients were treated [dose-escalation phase, n = 44 (tablet cohort, n = 12); dose-expansion phase, n = 22 (olaparib plus gemcitabine, n = 15; gemcitabine alone, n = 7)]. In the dose-escalation phase, four patients (6%) experienced dose-limiting toxicities (raised alanine aminotransferase, n = 2; neutropenia, n = 1; febrile neutropenia, n = 1). Grade ≥3 adverse events were reported in 38/47 patients (81%) treated with olaparib capsules plus gemcitabine; most common were haematological toxicities (55%). Tolerated combinations were olaparib 100 mg b.i.d. capsule (intermittently, days 1-14) plus gemcitabine 600 mg/m(2) and olaparib 100 mg o.d. tablet (intermittently, days 1-14) plus gemcitabine 600 mg/m(2). There were no differences in efficacy observed during the dose-expansion phase. CONCLUSIONS: Olaparib 100 mg b.i.d. (intermittent dosing; capsules) plus gemcitabine 600 mg/m(2) is tolerated in advanced solid tumour patients, with no unmanageable/unexpected toxicities. Continuous dosing of olaparib or combination with gemcitabine at doses >600 mg/m(2) was not considered to have an acceptable tolerability profile for further study. CLINICALTRIALSGOV: NCT00515866.

Phase II study of selumetinib (AZD6244, ARRY-142886) plus irinotecan as second-line therapy in patients with K-RAS mutated colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: More than half of colorectal tumors harbor activating mutations in RAS/RAF proteins. Selumetinib (AZD6244, ARRY-142886) is a small molecule kinase inhibitor targeting MEK kinase, downstream of RAS. We examined the efficacy and safety of selumetinib with irinotecan in second-line therapy. METHODS: Patients with K-RAS mutated colorectal cancer, progressing on first-line oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy with bevacizumab, were eligible for this multicenter open-label phase I/II trial. In part A, a dose was determined using a standard "3 + 3" design; in part B, efficacy was determined. The primary endpoint was RECIST response rate. Historical data for irinotecan were used as reference. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival and overall survival. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients entered the study, and 31 were treated. All had K-RAS exon 2 mutated tumors. In phase I, the recommended oral dose of selumetinib was 75 mg twice per day with intravenous (IV) irinotecan, 180 mg/m² every 2 weeks. Three patients (9.7 %) had partial response . Sixteen patients (51.6 %) had stable disease for ≥4 weeks, including three >1 year. The most common grade 3 adverse events included diarrhea, neutropenia, fatigue, anemia, nausea, and dehydration. The study was terminated before a pre-planned accrual of 45 subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Despite termination before full accrual, the point estimates of RR and median PFS show promising results, suggesting that further investigations of MEK inhibition in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer are warranted. Studies combining MEK inhibitors with cytotoxics or other targeted agents may lead to improved clinical activity based on the emerging preclinical data.

Improved time to treatment failure with an intermittent oxaliplatin strategy: results of CONcePT.

BACKGROUND: Oxaliplatin is an integral component of colorectal cancer treatment, but its use is limited by neurotoxicity. The Combined Oxaliplatin Neurotoxicity Prevention Trial (CONcePT) tested intermittent oxaliplatin (IO) administration and the use of concurrent calcium and magnesium salts (Ca/Mg), two modifications intended to reduce neurotoxicity and extend the duration of treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this trial involving double randomization, 140 patients were randomized to receive modified FOLFOX7 plus bevacizumab with IO (eight-cycle blocks of oxaliplatin treatment) versus continuous oxaliplatin (CO); and Ca/Mg versus placebo (pre- and postoxaliplatin infusion). The primary end point was time-to-treatment failure (TTF). RESULTS: One hundred thirty-nine patients were entered and treated up to the point of early study termination due to concerns by the data-monitoring committee (DMC) that Ca/Mg adversely affected tumor response. Tumor response was not a study end point. Given DMC concerns, an additional independent, blinded radiology review of all images showed no adverse effect of treatment schedule or Ca/Mg on response by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors. The IO schedule was superior to CO [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.581, P = 0.0026] for both TTF and time-to-tumor progression (TTP) (HR = 0.533, P = 0.047). CONCLUSIONS: An IO dosing schedule had a significant benefit on both TTF and TTP versus CO dosing in this trial despite the very attenuated sample. There was no effect of Ca/Mg on response.

The role of body mass index in survival outcome for lymphoma patients: US intergroup experience.

BACKGROUND: The role of body mass index (BMI) in survival outcomes is controversial among lymphoma patients. We evaluated the association between BMI at study entry and failure-free survival (FFS) and overall survival (OS) in three phase III clinical trials, among patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), follicular lymphoma (FL) and Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 537, 730 and 282 patients with DLBCL, HL and FL were included in the analysis. Baseline patient and clinical characteristics, treatment received and clinical outcomes were compared across BMI categories. RESULTS: Among patients with DLBCL, HL and FL, the median age was 70, 33 and 56; 29%, 29% and 37% were obese and 38%, 27% and 37% were overweight, respectively. Age was significantly different among BMI groups in all three studies. Higher BMI groups tended to have more favorable prognosis factors at study entry among DLBCL and HL patients. BMI was not associated with clinical outcome with P-values of 0.89, 0.30 and 0.40 for FFS, and 0.64, 0.67 and 0.09 for OS, for patients with DLBCL, HL and FL, respectively. The association remains non-significant after adjusting for other clinical factors in the Cox model. A subset analysis of males with DLBCL treated on R-CHOP revealed no differences in FFS (P = 0.48) or OS (P = 0.58). CONCLUSION: BMI was not significantly associated with clinical outcomes among patients with DLBCL, HD or FL, in three prospective phase III clinical trials. The findings contradict some previous reports of similar investigations. Further work is required to understand the observed discrepancies.

A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of oxaliplatin and bortezomib: activity, but dose-limiting neurotoxicity.

PURPOSE: The potential synergy of modulating platinum-induced DNA damage by combining the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib with oxaliplatin was studied in patients with solid tumors, with special attention to avoidance of cumulative neurotoxicity (NT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a 3 + 3 dose escalation design, patients received bortezomib at 1.0-1.5 mg/m² on days 1 and 4 and oxaliplatin at 60-85 mg/m² on day 1 of a 14-day cycle. NT assessments were performed at the start of every two cycles. Oxaliplatin pharmacokinetics (PK) were determined pre- and post-bortezomib. RESULTS: Thirty patients were enrolled with 25 (11 men, 14 women) fully evaluable for NT assessments at cycle 2. The median age was 56 years (range 35-74 years); median number of cycles received 2 (range 1-10). At dose levels 2-5 (B 1.3 mg/m²), patients manifested NT grades 3 and 4 at a median 3.4 cycles (range 2-9 cycles): 3 had ataxia (one also with sensory neuropathy or neurogenic hypotension, respectively) and 3 had just sensory neuropathy. A 6th dose-level reducing bortezomib to 1.0 mg/m² with oxaliplatin 85 mg/m²) was explored and no NT or dose limiting toxicities were noted among 7 evaluable patients (5 receiving two or more cycles). Four patients experienced a partial response--one with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer, another with gastroesophageal cancer, another with ampulla of Vater carcinoma, and a patient with cholangiocarcinoma. PK studies at dose levels 1 and 2 showed greater mean ultrafiltrable platinum when oxaliplatin was dosed after bortezomib. CONCLUSIONS: Bortezomib 1.0 mg/m² × 2 every 14 days combines safely with oxaliplatin. At higher doses, cumulative NT (i.e., cerebellar signs and sensory neuropathy) occurs at an accelerated pace perhaps from a PK interaction.

A phase I trial of oral ridaforolimus (AP23573; MK-8669) in combination with bevacizumab for patients with advanced cancers.

AIMS: This phase I dose-escalation study was designed to evaluate the combination of the mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor ridaforolimus with the vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor bevacizumab. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventeen adult patients with refractory advanced solid tumours received oral ridaforolimus (30 or 40 mg) once daily for 5 days per week (QDx5/wk) combined with intravenous bevacizumab (10 mg/kg every 2 weeks [Q2wk] or 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks [Q3wk]). Patients were evaluated for dose-limiting toxicities, safety and anti-tumour activity. RESULTS: A 40 mg dose of ridaforolimus with either bevacizumab dosing schedule was the recommended phase II dose. No dose-limiting toxicities were reported; the most common drug-related adverse events were mucosal inflammation and anorexia. Seven patients, with clinical features that included primary tumour of the abdominal origin (colorectal, pancreatic or gynaecological cancers) and previous abdominal radiotherapy, reported serious adverse events related to bowel perforations. There were no objective responses, but 65% of patients had a best response of stable disease. CONCLUSION: Oral ridaforolimus (40 mg QDx5/wk) is feasible to combine with standard doses of bevacizumab, although careful patient selection would be needed to mitigate the risk of bowel perforation-related adverse events. Combination therapy produced prolonged stable disease in several heavily pretreated patients.

Phase II study of liposomal cisplatin (SPI-77) in platinum-sensitive recurrences of ovarian cancer.

BACKGROUND: Cisplatin is a highly effective chemotherapeutic agent against epithelial ovarian cancer but is associated with significant toxicities. SPI-77 is a liposomal pegylated formulation of cisplatin that was developed to reduce systemic toxicity and to better deliver cisplatin to tumors. We assessed the response rates and safety of SPI-77, in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were selected for having previously achieved a platinum treatment free interval of greater than 6 months (e.g. platinum-sensitive) and high potential of achieving responses when rechallenged with a platinum drug. SPI-77 was administered at a dose of 260 mg/m(2) every 21 days until disease progression. RESULTS: Enrollment was terminated after 5 patients were treated because of concern with the adequacy of the formulation. Four out of the five patients had stable disease as best response. While no serious, unexpected adverse events occurred in spite of large cumulative doses of SPI-77, there were concerns related to the large lipid load and prolonged persistence of residual platinum in body stores. CONCLUSION: The results of this study, although inconclusive regarding its primary endpoints, provide some important lessons for the development of similar liposomal platinum agents.

Phase I clinical study of infusional 5-fluorouracil with oxaliplatin and gemcitabine (FOG regimen) in patients with solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose, recommended phase II dose (RPTD) and toxicities of the FOG regimen (infusional 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, gemcitabine). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced solid tumors were treated in an accelerated titration scheme. 5-Fluorouracil was administered intravenously at 200 mg/m(2)/day for 14 days and repeated every 21 days (one cycle). Gemcitabine was administered on days 1 and 8 over 30 min at 450-650 mg/m(2). Oxaliplatin was administered on day 1 over 2 h at 85-130 mg/m(2). For cycles 1, 3 and beyond, gemcitabine followed oxaliplatin; for cycle 2, gemcitabine preceded oxaliplatin. RESULTS: Forty-five and 39 patients were assessable for toxicity and response, respectively. Cycle 1 dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) included neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and diarrhea. No DLT was observed in cycle 1 at the first four dose levels (DL). At DL-5, two of four (50%) patients experienced DLT in cycle 1. Expanding DL-4, nine of 26 (35%) patients experienced DLT in cycle 1. Because recurrent grade 3 toxicities were observed in three of six (50%) patients at DL-3, DL-2 was considered the RPTD. At the RPTD, three patients had a partial response (response rate 23%). CONCLUSIONS: The RPTD for the 5-fluorouracil-oxaliplatin-gemcitabine combination is 200/100/450 mg/m(2). This novel regimen has demonstrated activity in advanced solid tumors and merits further investigation.

New oxaliplatin-based combinations in the treatment of colorectal cancer.

The synergism between oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5FU)/leucovorin in the treatment of colorectal cancer raises the prospect of further clinically effective combinations. Phase I/II trials of capecitabine, an oral fluoropyrimidine, plus oxaliplatin have established this combination (XELOX) as an effective treatment for advanced disease, with response rates of over 50% in first line therapy. Phase III studies of XELOX are now in progress, while further studies are investigating the combined use of oxaliplatin and a second oral fluoropyrimidine, UFT, after positive phase I/II results. Studies of combined oxaliplatin and irinotecan treatment have reported response rates varying from 25% to 60% in second-line therapy of treatment resistant metastatic disease, and 42% in first line therapy. The optimum dosing combination of these two agents has yet to be determined however, and in many patients it is likely that greater overall survival will be achieved by using them in successive lines rather than in combination. Clinical studies have also demonstrated clinically significant response rates when oxaliplatin is combined with other agents including raltitrexed and mitomycin C. Alongside these novel chemotherapeutic combinations, a range of biological therapies is now being investigated in combination with oxaliplatin in advanced colorectal cancer. Cetuximab (C225) is a monoclonal antibody that inhibits signalling through the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), a pathway that has been associated with a variety of pathological process in cancer including dysregulated growth, differentiation, angiogenesis, cell motility and cell adhesion. Studies of second-line therapy combining oxaliplatin and cetuximab in advanced disease and in patients with unresectable liver-only metastases are in progress in the United States. A phase I/II study is also investigating the combined use of oxaliplatin and ZD1839 ('Iressa'), a small molecule inhibitor of the EGFR specific tyrosine kinase activating the same pathways. Anti-angiogenesis agents are also being studied intensely. A key angiogenic pathway in the stimulation of tumour growth is the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway, inhibited by the monoclonal antibody bevacizumab. Phase II first line and phase III second line studies of oxaliplatin in combination with bevacizumab are now in progress. Oxaliplatin is being investigated in combination with a number of other classes of biological agent, including the proteasome inhibitor PS-341. The sudden appearance of a wide range of chemotherapeutic and biological agents with activity against colorectal cancer presents many challenges to the current system of clinical trials, given the large number of permutations requiring prospective testing. However, by building upon the encouraging results achieved using oxaliplatin plus 5FU/leucovorin, the introduction of new agents will eventually translate into significantly improved clinical outcomes.

Activity and safety of vinorelbine combined with doxorubicin or fluorouracil as first-line therapy in advanced breast cancer: a stratified phase II study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of vinorelbine combined with doxorubicin or continuous infusion of fluorouracil as initial therapy for advanced breast cancer. AUBJECTS AND METHODS: A total of 118 women who had not received chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer were enrolled and included in the intent-to-treat analysis. Subjects were stratified into two treatment groups. If subjects were candidates for anthracycline therapy, they received doxorubicin 50 mg/m(2) on day 1 and vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 (n = 62). If subjects had received adjuvant anthracycline therapy or had cardiac disease, they received fluorouracil 750 mg/m(2)/day by continuous infusion on days 1 through 5 and vinorelbine 30 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 5 (n = 56). The regimens were repeated every 21 days until evidence of progression of disease or severe toxicity. RESULTS: For doxorubicin and vinorelbine, the objective response rate was 55% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 42% to 68%), median time to disease progression was 34 weeks, median time to treatment failure was 32 weeks, and median survival was 92 weeks (95% CI: 72 to 128 weeks). For fluorouracil and vinorelbine, the objective response rate was 45% (95% CI: 31% to 59%), median time to disease progression was 32 weeks, median time to treatment failure was 30 weeks, and median survival was 53 weeks (95% CI: 47 to 64 weeks). The most common adverse event was grade 3 or 4 granulocytopenia, which occurred in 95% of subjects in the doxorubicin-vinorelbine group and in 88% of those in the fluorouracil-vinorelbine group. The most common nonhematologic adverse event was grade 3 or 4 stomatitis, which occurred in 9% and 32% of subjects in the two groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: Both vinorelbine-containing regimens appear to offer useful options as initial therapy for advanced breast cancer. Both regimens were active, and any efficacy differences between the two may have been related to differences in prognosis for the anthracycline-pretreated group (i.e., selection for prior aggressive adjuvant therapy) and or comorbid cardiac conditions. Both regimens were associated with predictable but manageable toxicity, but a lower dose of fluorouracil (e.g., 600 mg/m(2)/day) should be used to reduce the risk of stomatitis.

High-performance liquid chromatography-based determination of total isothiocyanate levels in human plasma: application to studies with 2-phenethyl isothiocyanate.

Dietary and pharmacologic isothiocyanates (ITCs) may play a role in reducing the risk of certain cancers. The quantification of ITCs in humans is important both for epidemiological and pharmacokinetic studies. We describe a modification of an HPLC-based assay of urinary ITCs for use with human plasma. The assay utilizes the cyclocondensation reaction of 1,2-benzenedithiol with ITCs present in human plasma, followed by a two-step hexane extraction and analysis by HPLC using UV detection at 365 nm. The method shows linearity and reproducibility with human plasma over a range of 49-3003 nM phenethyl isothiocyanate (PEITC) (r(2) = 0.996 +/- 0.003). A similar degree of linearity was seen with two other biologically occurring conjugates of PEITC: PEITC--N-acetylcysteine (PEITC--NAC) and PEITC--glutathione (PEITC--GSH). The recovery of PEITC assessed on multiple days was 96.6 +/- 1.5% and was 100% for PEITC--GSH and PEITC--NAC. The reproducibility of the assay on multiday samplings showed a mean %CV of 6.5 +/- 0.3% for PEITC, 6.4 +/- 4.3 for PEITC--NAC and 12.3 +/- 3.9 for PEITC--GSH. In clinical studies, mean plasma ITC level of 413 +/- 193 nM PEITC equivalents was determined for a non-dietary-controlled group of 23 subjects. Multiday analysis data from pharmacokinetic plasma sets of 3 subjects taking a single dose of PEITC at 40 mg showed a good CV (range: 16-21%). The applicability of the methodology to pharmacokinetic studies of PEITC in humans is demonstrated.

Toxicity and response evaluation of the interferon inducer poly ICLC administered at low dose in advanced renal carcinoma and relapsed or refractory lymphoma: a report of two clinical trials of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.

PURPOSE: Phase II studies were conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the interferon inducer Poly ICLC at low doses in advanced renal cancer and relapsed or refractory lymphoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with advanced renal carcinoma and eleven patients with lymphoma were treated with poly ICLC. Patients received 0.25 mg/m2 of poly ICLC intravenously twice weekly three days apart until progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: There were no objective responses. Six patients with renal carcinoma had stable disease as best response with one patient receiving 62 weeks of therapy. Toxicity included grade 3 anemia in 8 patients and grade 4 anemia in one patient. All patients were anemic prior to entry with a median grade 2 anemia at baseline. Grade 4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and injection site pain occurred in one patient each. Grade 3 fever, chills or fatigue occurred in four, three, and three patients respectively. Any grade fever occurred in 10 patients (25.6%) and any grade chills occurred in 9 patients (23.1%). CONCLUSION: Poly ICLC at this dose and schedule is well tolerated in both patient populations and is inactive in renal carcinoma.

Radiosensitization of tumor-targeted radioimmunotherapy with prolonged topotecan infusion in human breast cancer xenografts.

Clinical radioimmunotherapy (RIT) of solid tumors holds great promise, but as yet has been unable to deliver tumoricidal radiation doses without unacceptable toxicity. Our experimental approach aims to potentiate the therapeutic action of radioimmunoconjugates at the tumor site and thus improve the efficacy of RIT by combination with other treatment modalities. The topoisomerase I inhibitors are a unique class of chemotherapeutic agents that interfere with DNA breakage-reunion by inhibiting the action of topoisomerase I. Preclinical studies suggest that prolonged infusion of topoisomerase I inhibitors enhances cell toxicity due to ionizing radiation. We evaluated the efficacy of combined treatment with continuous administration of topotecan and 90Y-MX-DPTA BrE3 monoclonal antibody (which recognizes an epitope of breast epithelial mucin expressed in most breast cancers) on human mammary carcinoma xenografts in nude mice. Topotecan or 90Y-BrE3 treatment alone delayed overall tumor growth rate transiently but did not affect survival. The combination of RIT with topotecan substantially reduced growth of relatively large established tumors and caused complete tumor regressions and prolonged tumor-free survival in a substantial proportion of treated animals. In vitro studies demonstrated an increase in apoptotic rate and a decrease in cell proliferation of tumor cell lines treated with this combination. We combined the radiosensitization property of topotecan and the specificity of systemic RIT to establish a novel therapy for solid tumors in an experimental tumor xenograft model.

Selenium and immunocompetence in patients with head and neck cancer.

This randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study aimed to determine whether oral intake of 200 microg/d of sodium selenite, a dose within the safe and adequate daily intake (50-200 microg/d) recommended by the U.S. Food and Nutrition Board, will abrogate depressed or enhance normal-level immune functions of patients receiving therapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Subjects were given one selenium/placebo tablet/d for 8 wk, beginning on the day of their first treatment for the disease (e.g., surgery, radiation, or surgery and radiation) and their immune functions were monitored. Supplementation with selenium (Se) during therapy resulted in a significantly enhanced cell-mediated immunue responsiveness, as reflected in the ability of the patient's lymphocytes to respond to stimulation with mitogen, to generate cytotoxic lymphocytes, and to destroy tumor cells. The enhanced responsiveness was evident during therapy and following conclusion of therapy. In contrast, patients in the placebo arm of the study showed a decline in immune responsiveness during therapy, which was followed, in some patients, by an enhancement, but the responses of the group remained significantly lower than baseline values. The data also show that at baseline, patients entered in the study had significantly lower plasma Se levels than healthy individuals, and patients in stage I or II of disease had significantly higher plasma selenium levels than patients in stage III or IV of disease.

Multicenter phase II study to evaluate a 28-day regimen of oral fluorouracil plus eniluracil in the treatment of patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy of fluorouracil (5-FU) plus eniluracil when administered to patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this single-arm phase II study, patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer received oral eniluracil plus 5-FU (10:1 dose ratio), at 5-FU doses of 1.00 mg/m(2) or 1.15 mg/m(2) twice daily (every 12 hours) for 28 consecutive days repeated every 5 weeks (one cycle). Treatment continued until there was documented disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: Thirty and 25 patients were enrolled at a starting dose of 1.00 mg/m(2) and 1.15 mg/m(2), respectively. Fourteen (25%) of 55 patients (95% confidence interval, 15% to 39%) had a partial response, and 20 patients (36%) had stable disease. The median durations of the partial responses and stable disease were 23.9 weeks (range, 12.3 to 52.1+ weeks) and 24.1 weeks (range, 17.1 to 55.6+ weeks), respectively. The median durations of progression-free and overall survival were 22.6 weeks (range, 21.0 to 29.0 weeks) and 59 weeks (range, 4 to 84+ weeks), respectively. The response rate in the 1.15 mg/m(2)-dose group was similar to the 1.00 mg/m(2)-dose group (28% v 23%, respectively). Severe (grade 3/4) nonhematologic treatment-related toxicity included diarrhea (nine patients), nausea/vomiting (one patient each), mucositis (two patients), and anorexia (one patient). Severe hematologic toxicities were rare. At the 1.15 mg/m(2)-dose level, two patients exhibited grade 3 granulocytopenia, and two patients had grade 3 anemia. CONCLUSION: The response rate with oral 5-FU plus eniluracil is comparable with that observed with infusional 5-FU or bolus 5-FU and leucovorin. The toxicity profile of this oral regimen is acceptable for use in an outpatient home-based setting.

Phase II study of combination taxol and estramustine phosphate in the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme.

Taxol has activity in the treatment of high grade gliomas but estramustine phosphate (EMP) has not been used in this setting. In vitro data demonstrates that EMP is cytotoxic to glioma cell lines and estramustine binding proteins are expressed by glioma cells. The combination of Taxol and EMP is reported to be active in the treatment of hormone-refractory prostate cancer and in taxane-resistant breast and ovarian cancer. We therefore performed a phase II study to assess the activity and toxicity of this combination in high grade gliomas. Taxol was given at a dose of 225 mg/m2 intravenously over three hours on day 1 and EMP was given at a dose of 900 mg/m2 orally on days 1 through 3. Cycles were repeated every three weeks. Twenty patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) were enrolled: 11 male, median age 45 years. All patients received anti-epileptic medications and 17 (80%) had received prior chemotherapy. Of 18 evaluable patients, two had partial responses (11) and six had stable disease (33%) for a minimum of eight weeks. Treatment was well tolerated with grade 3 neutropenia occurring in only three patients. There were no other grade 3 or 4 toxicities. The median time to progression for the cohort was only six weeks (range 3-60+ weeks). The median overall survival was 12 weeks (range 3-60+ weeks). In conclusion, the combination of Taxol and EMP is well tolerated and has modest activity in the treatment of recurrent GBM.