Neutropenia and survival outcomes in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with trifluridine/tipiracil in the RECOURSE and J003 trials.

BACKGROUND: The phase II J003 (N = 169) and phase III RECOURSE (N = 800) trials demonstrated a significant improvement in survival with trifluridine (FTD)/tipiracil (TPI) versus placebo in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. This post hoc analysis investigated pharmacokinetic data of FTD/TPI exposure and pharmacodynamic markers, such as chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) and clinical outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 210 patients from RECOURSE were enrolled in this substudy. A limited sampling approach was used, with three pharmacokinetic samples drawn on day 12 of cycle 1. Patients were categorized as being above or below the median area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) for FTD and TPI. We conducted a post hoc analysis using the entire RECOURSE population to determine the correlations between CIN and clinical outcome. We then carried out a similar analysis on the J003 trial to validate the results. RESULTS: In the RECOURSE subset, patients in the high FTD AUC group had a significantly increased CIN risk. Analyses of the entire population demonstrated that FTD/TPI-treated patients with CIN of any grade in cycles 1 and 2 had significantly longer median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) than patients who did not develop CIN and patients in the placebo group. Patients who required an FTD/TPI treatment delay had increased OS and PFS versus those in the placebo group and those who did not develop CIN. Similar results were obtained in the J003 cohort. CONCLUSIONS: In RECOURSE, patients with higher FTD drug exposure had an increased CIN risk. FTD/TPI-treated patients who developed CIN had improved OS and PFS versus those in the placebo group and those who did not develop CIN. Similar findings were reported in the J003 cohort, thus validating the RECOURSE results. The occurrence of CIN may be a useful predictor of treatment outcomes for FTD/TPI-treated patients. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT01607957 (RECOURSE). JAPAN PHARMACEUTICAL INFORMATION CENTER NUMBER: JapicCTI-090880 (J003).

Phase II study of selumetinib (AZD6244, ARRY-142886) plus irinotecan as second-line therapy in patients with K-RAS mutated colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: More than half of colorectal tumors harbor activating mutations in RAS/RAF proteins. Selumetinib (AZD6244, ARRY-142886) is a small molecule kinase inhibitor targeting MEK kinase, downstream of RAS. We examined the efficacy and safety of selumetinib with irinotecan in second-line therapy. METHODS: Patients with K-RAS mutated colorectal cancer, progressing on first-line oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy with bevacizumab, were eligible for this multicenter open-label phase I/II trial. In part A, a dose was determined using a standard "3 + 3" design; in part B, efficacy was determined. The primary endpoint was RECIST response rate. Historical data for irinotecan were used as reference. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival and overall survival. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients entered the study, and 31 were treated. All had K-RAS exon 2 mutated tumors. In phase I, the recommended oral dose of selumetinib was 75 mg twice per day with intravenous (IV) irinotecan, 180 mg/m² every 2 weeks. Three patients (9.7 %) had partial response . Sixteen patients (51.6 %) had stable disease for ≥4 weeks, including three >1 year. The most common grade 3 adverse events included diarrhea, neutropenia, fatigue, anemia, nausea, and dehydration. The study was terminated before a pre-planned accrual of 45 subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Despite termination before full accrual, the point estimates of RR and median PFS show promising results, suggesting that further investigations of MEK inhibition in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer are warranted. Studies combining MEK inhibitors with cytotoxics or other targeted agents may lead to improved clinical activity based on the emerging preclinical data.

Improved time to treatment failure with an intermittent oxaliplatin strategy: results of CONcePT.

BACKGROUND: Oxaliplatin is an integral component of colorectal cancer treatment, but its use is limited by neurotoxicity. The Combined Oxaliplatin Neurotoxicity Prevention Trial (CONcePT) tested intermittent oxaliplatin (IO) administration and the use of concurrent calcium and magnesium salts (Ca/Mg), two modifications intended to reduce neurotoxicity and extend the duration of treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this trial involving double randomization, 140 patients were randomized to receive modified FOLFOX7 plus bevacizumab with IO (eight-cycle blocks of oxaliplatin treatment) versus continuous oxaliplatin (CO); and Ca/Mg versus placebo (pre- and postoxaliplatin infusion). The primary end point was time-to-treatment failure (TTF). RESULTS: One hundred thirty-nine patients were entered and treated up to the point of early study termination due to concerns by the data-monitoring committee (DMC) that Ca/Mg adversely affected tumor response. Tumor response was not a study end point. Given DMC concerns, an additional independent, blinded radiology review of all images showed no adverse effect of treatment schedule or Ca/Mg on response by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors. The IO schedule was superior to CO [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.581, P = 0.0026] for both TTF and time-to-tumor progression (TTP) (HR = 0.533, P = 0.047). CONCLUSIONS: An IO dosing schedule had a significant benefit on both TTF and TTP versus CO dosing in this trial despite the very attenuated sample. There was no effect of Ca/Mg on response.

A phase I trial of oral ridaforolimus (AP23573; MK-8669) in combination with bevacizumab for patients with advanced cancers.

AIMS: This phase I dose-escalation study was designed to evaluate the combination of the mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor ridaforolimus with the vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor bevacizumab. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventeen adult patients with refractory advanced solid tumours received oral ridaforolimus (30 or 40 mg) once daily for 5 days per week (QDx5/wk) combined with intravenous bevacizumab (10 mg/kg every 2 weeks [Q2wk] or 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks [Q3wk]). Patients were evaluated for dose-limiting toxicities, safety and anti-tumour activity. RESULTS: A 40 mg dose of ridaforolimus with either bevacizumab dosing schedule was the recommended phase II dose. No dose-limiting toxicities were reported; the most common drug-related adverse events were mucosal inflammation and anorexia. Seven patients, with clinical features that included primary tumour of the abdominal origin (colorectal, pancreatic or gynaecological cancers) and previous abdominal radiotherapy, reported serious adverse events related to bowel perforations. There were no objective responses, but 65% of patients had a best response of stable disease. CONCLUSION: Oral ridaforolimus (40 mg QDx5/wk) is feasible to combine with standard doses of bevacizumab, although careful patient selection would be needed to mitigate the risk of bowel perforation-related adverse events. Combination therapy produced prolonged stable disease in several heavily pretreated patients.

Activity and safety of vinorelbine combined with doxorubicin or fluorouracil as first-line therapy in advanced breast cancer: a stratified phase II study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of vinorelbine combined with doxorubicin or continuous infusion of fluorouracil as initial therapy for advanced breast cancer. AUBJECTS AND METHODS: A total of 118 women who had not received chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer were enrolled and included in the intent-to-treat analysis. Subjects were stratified into two treatment groups. If subjects were candidates for anthracycline therapy, they received doxorubicin 50 mg/m(2) on day 1 and vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 (n = 62). If subjects had received adjuvant anthracycline therapy or had cardiac disease, they received fluorouracil 750 mg/m(2)/day by continuous infusion on days 1 through 5 and vinorelbine 30 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 5 (n = 56). The regimens were repeated every 21 days until evidence of progression of disease or severe toxicity. RESULTS: For doxorubicin and vinorelbine, the objective response rate was 55% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 42% to 68%), median time to disease progression was 34 weeks, median time to treatment failure was 32 weeks, and median survival was 92 weeks (95% CI: 72 to 128 weeks). For fluorouracil and vinorelbine, the objective response rate was 45% (95% CI: 31% to 59%), median time to disease progression was 32 weeks, median time to treatment failure was 30 weeks, and median survival was 53 weeks (95% CI: 47 to 64 weeks). The most common adverse event was grade 3 or 4 granulocytopenia, which occurred in 95% of subjects in the doxorubicin-vinorelbine group and in 88% of those in the fluorouracil-vinorelbine group. The most common nonhematologic adverse event was grade 3 or 4 stomatitis, which occurred in 9% and 32% of subjects in the two groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: Both vinorelbine-containing regimens appear to offer useful options as initial therapy for advanced breast cancer. Both regimens were active, and any efficacy differences between the two may have been related to differences in prognosis for the anthracycline-pretreated group (i.e., selection for prior aggressive adjuvant therapy) and or comorbid cardiac conditions. Both regimens were associated with predictable but manageable toxicity, but a lower dose of fluorouracil (e.g., 600 mg/m(2)/day) should be used to reduce the risk of stomatitis.

Phase I study of fludarabine plus cyclophosphamide in patients with previously untreated low-grade lymphoma: results and and long-term follow-up--a report from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.

PURPOSE: To determine the toxicity and recommended phase II doses of the combination of fludarabine plus cyclophosphamide in chemotherapy-naive patients with low-grade lymphoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Previously untreated patients with low-grade lymphoma were entered onto dosing cohorts of four patients each. The cyclophosphamide dose, given on day 1, was increased from 600 to 1, 000 mg/m(2). Fludarabine 20 mg/m(2) was administered on days 1 through 5. The first eight patients were treated every 21 days; later patients were treated every 28 days. Prophylactic antibiotics were required. RESULTS: Prolonged cytopenia and pulmonary toxicity each occurred in three of eight patients treated every 3 weeks. The 19 patients treated every 28 days, who were given granulocyte colony-stimulating factor as indicated, did not have undue nonhematologic toxicity. Dose-limiting toxicity was hematologic. At the recommended phase II/III dose (cyclophosphamide 1,000 mg/m(2)), grade 4 neutropenia was observed in 17% of all cycles and 31% of first cycles. Grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia was seen in only 1% of all cycles. The median number of cycles per patient was six (range, two to 11) for all patients enrolled. The response rate was 100% of 27 patients entered; 89% achieved a complete and 11% a partial response. Nineteen of 22 patients with bone marrow involvement had clearing of the marrow. Median duration of follow-up was more than 5 years; median overall and disease-free survival times have not been reached. Kaplan-Meier estimated 5-year overall survival and disease-free survival rates were 66% and 53%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The recommended dosing for this combination in patients with previously untreated low-grade lymphoma is cyclophosphamide 1, 000 mg/m(2) day 1 and fludarabine 20 mg/m(2) days 1 through 5. The regimen has a high level of activity, with prolonged complete remissions providing 5-year overall and disease-free survival rates as high as those reported for other therapeutic approaches in untreated patients.

Clinical pharmacology of dexrazoxane.

Dexrazoxane is a synthetic bisdiketopiperazine two-ringed compound which hydrolyzes to an EDTA analog. These rings undergo intracellular hydrolysis to form the single and double (ICRF-198) chelating forms of the compound by both enzymatic and non-enzymatic catalysis. These dexrazoxane metabolites are efficient at stripping the cations from the iron:anthracycline complex. The disruption of the complex prevents the oxidative damage from free radicals promoted by this anthracycline complex. Pharmacologic studies of single agent dexrazoxane (originally studied as an antineoplastic agent) demonstrates an alpha half-life of approximately 30 minutes and a beta half-life of 2 to 4 hours. When given in combination with anthracyclines (e.g. doxorubicin or epirubicin) the pharmacokinetics of dexrazoxane are unchanged. Additional studies of anthracycline metabolism when given in combination with dexrazoxane, both in single arm and randomized cross-over studies, have generally shown no change in anthracycline metabolism, including pharmacokinetic parameters of alpha, beta, and gamma half-lives, area-under-the-curve, or clearance. There is no pharmacokinetic interaction of dexrazoxane on anthracycline metabolism and, therefore, pharmacokinetics cannot account for the cardioprotective effects described for dexrazoxane.

Improved long term survival after intracavitary interleukin-2 and lymphokine-activated killer cells for adults with recurrent malignant glioma.

BACKGROUND: The median survival for adults with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is 12 months, despite surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. Regimens using interleukin-2 (IL-2) plus lymphokine-activated killer (LAK) cells have been beneficial against systemic cancers, albeit with significant toxicity. METHODS: Nineteen adults with recurrent malignant glioma (5 GBMs, and 4 anaplastic astrocytomas (AA)), Karnofsky performance status 60 or greater, were treated with intracavitary autologous LAK cells plus IL-2 after reoperation. Lymphokine-activated killer cells and IL-2 were given on day 1, and IL-2 alone was given 5 times during a 2-week cycle. This cycle was repeated at 2 weeks to constitute one 6-week course of therapy. Each two-cycle course of treatment was repeated at 3-month intervals for patients with stable disease or response to therapy. At the conclusion of immunotherapy, all patients were offered chemotherapy, generally carmustine or procarbazine, including responders. Corticosteroids were strictly limited during immunotherapy. Sequential reservoir aspirates were obtained for microbiologic and cytologic analyses. RESULTS: The maximal tolerated dose for a 12-dose course of therapy was 1.2 million international units (MIU) per dose. Dose-limiting, cumulative IL-2-related central nervous system (CNS) toxicity was observed at 2.4 MIU per dose. Three responses were confirmed by computed tomography scan during therapy: one complete response (CR) (1 AA), and two partial responses (PR) (2 GBM); as well as a significant increase in GBM survival. One additional CR (GBM) was observed at 17 months. The median survival for immunotherapy patients with GBM was 53 weeks after reoperation (N = 15) (mean, 87.9 +/- 21.4 weeks, standard error for the mean), with 8 of 15 surviving more than 1 year (53%). The median survival for 18 contemporary patients with GBM reoperated and treated with chemotherapy was 25.5 weeks (mean, 27.4 +/- 3.7 weeks), with 1/18 alive at 1 year (> 6%). Six of the 15 patients with GBM had additional surgery or biopsy, and chemotherapy after immunotherapy. The contribution of subsequent chemotherapy to survival cannot be discounted. CONCLUSIONS: Lymphokine-activated killer cells and IL-2 can be administered safely within the CNS resulting in improved long term survival in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Increased survival was associated with significant biologic changes characterized by a regional eosinophilia, and extensive lymphocytic infiltration. A prospective randomized clinical trial is warranted.

Combined doxorubicin/vinorelbine (Navelbine) therapy in the treatment of advanced breast cancer.

A multicenter US study of the combination of doxorubicin (50 mg/m2 day 1) and vinorelbine (Navelbine; Burroughs Wellcome Co, Research Triangle Park, NC; Pierre Fabre Médicament, Paris, France) (25 mg/m2 days 1 and 8) every 21 days examined the effects of this regimen as first-line chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer patients. Of the 62 patients enrolled in the study, 41 were completely evaluable for response and toxicity at the time of this analysis. The median patient age was 59 years. Prior therapy included hormone therapy (55%), adjuvant chemotherapy (40%), and radiotherapy (28%). Two hundred twelve courses of combined therapy were given. Toxicities included granulocytopenia (grade 4, 83%; grade 3, 12%), febrile neutropenia requiring hospitalization (three patients, 8%), septic death (one patient, 3%), thrombocytopenia (grade 3, 5%), stomatitis (grade 4, 5%), alopecia (grade 3, 15%), and nausea/vomiting (grade 3, 12%). One patient developed clinical congestive heart failure due to doxorubicin. The overall response rate for 58 patients evaluable for response was 57% (95% confidence interval: 45% to 69%): 16% of patients had complete responses (9 patients) and 41% had partial responses (24 patients). Twenty-seven percent of patients had stable disease (16 patients). This regimen was well tolerated and had excellent patient acceptance.

Activity of fludarabine in previously treated non-Hodgkin's low-grade lymphoma: results of an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study.

PURPOSE: Fludarabine (2-fluoro-arabanoside-monophosphate) is a new antimetabolite chemotherapeutic agent. We performed a multicenter, phase II study of this drug in previously treated patients with refractory or relapsed non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) to determine its response rate by histologic classification. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-two assessable patients were given 18 mg/m2 by intravenous (IV) bolus injection daily for 5 days, every 28 days. Forty-eight percent had previously had one chemotherapy regimen, and the remainder had had two regimens; 42% had had radiation. RESULTS: Patients received 273 cycles of fludarabine chemotherapy, with a median of two cycles and ranging up to 25 cycles. Sixty patients were assessable for response, including nine complete responses (CRs; 15%) and nine partial responses (PRs; 15%). The response rate for patients with lower-grade histology was 52% (13 of 25); the greatest response rate was seen in those with follicular small cleaved-cell lymphoma, including seven of 11 treated. Five responders remain in unmaintained remission; the median survival of responders is greater than 30 months. Toxicity included mild neutropenia and a 10% incidence of grade 3 neurologic toxicity with occasional reversible visual and auditory changes. CONCLUSION: Fludarabine is active in patients with previously treated NHL (particularly low-grade histologies). Future studies will examine its activity in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents in previously untreated patients.

Phase I trial of escalating dose doxorubicin administered concurrently with alpha 2-interferon.

The clinical use of alpha 2-interferon and doxorubicin is based on in vitro and preclinical in vivo observations of synergistic antitumor efficacy. To test this combination a Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of the concurrent use of alpha 2-interferon and doxorubicin was initiated in patients with malignant solid tumors. Each 5-wk treatment cycle consisted of 3 wk of drug administration and 2 wk of rest. The alpha 2-interferon was administered s.c. at a constant dose of 10 million IU/m2 on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays in all patients while the doxorubicin was administered weekly beginning with a dose of 5 mg/m2 and escalated to the maximum tolerated dose of 25 mg/m2. At least three evaluable patients were entered at each dose level, and no dose escalations were allowed within patients. The dose-limiting toxicities were granulocytopenia and thrombocytopenia. Hepatic enzyme elevations and systemic symptoms due to interferon occurred at all dose levels. None was severe or dose limiting, and all were reversible. These toxicity data suggest that the hepatotoxic effects of interferon do not enhance doxorubicin toxicity when given by this dose and schedule. Doxorubicin plasma levels were measured at each dose level. The recommended dose of doxorubicin is 25 mg/m2 per wk when administered with 10 million IU/m2 of interferon in this schedule. This schedule allows for the administration of a greater total dose of doxorubicin than has been achieved when given every 3 wk with the same dose and schedule of alpha 2-interferon in a parallel study.

Oral 4-demethoxydaunorubicin (idarubicin) in bronchogenic lung cancer; phase II trial.

Eighteen patients with non-small cell lung cancer were entered into a phase II protocol of oral 4-demethoxydaunorubicin. All were evaluable for toxicity and 17 for response. The major toxicity was hematologic with eight patients developing an ECOG grade 3 or 4 toxicity. There were no responses to the treatment.

4'Epidoxorubicin (epirubicin): activity in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Doxorubicin provides the most consistent response rate in hepatocellular carcinoma. We therefore initiated a trial with its analog 4'epidoxorubicin. Eighteen patients, all without prior treatment, were given the drug as a single agent every 3 weeks with dose escalation whenever possible. Five patients were treated by six-hour infusion and 13 by intravenous (IV) bolus injection, with the median dose being 90 mg/m2. The patients were of diverse ethnic background and included some with underlying cirrhosis and hepatitis B surface antigenemia. Three patients had partial remissions (6, 12, 48 weeks) for a response rate of 17%. Four patients also had prolonged stable disease (14, 26, 27, 38 weeks). Toxicity was mild, although cardiac toxicity developed in three patients at 685, 825, and 1,460 mg/m2 cumulative dose. The response to 4'epidoxorubicin in this study appears to be equivalent to the reported response rates for doxorubicin, with decreased toxicity.