Measuring the quality of anaesthesia from a patient's perspective: development, validation, and implementation of a short questionnaire.

BACKGROUND: The primary aim of this study was to develop and validate a short psychometric instrument to assess the patient's perception of the quality of anaesthesia. METHODS: In Part 1, the Perception of Quality in Anaesthesia (PQA) questionnaire was developed, pilot tested, and validated. Attributes of high-quality anaesthesia were identified using a process that restricted input to patients and members of the public. In Part 2, patient cohorts completed the PQA before, and after, a 6 month period where anaesthetists were given individualized performance data using questions from the PQA. RESULTS: In Part 1, items in the PQA were identified and ranked by 120 patients and members of the public. Validity and reliability of the PQA was assessed by 714 patients. Principal component analysis showed that the PQA comprised five factors: attention/gentleness; pain management; information/confidence; postoperative nausea or vomiting (PONV); and concerns addressed. In Part 2, there were 2046 patient participants in the pre-feedback cohort, 4251 in the feedback cohort, and 1421 in the post-feedback cohort. Unsatisfactory experience in at least one PQA factor was described by 45.2% [95% confidence interval (CI) 43.1-47.4%] during the pre-feedback period, and 35.0% (95% CI 32.6-37.6%) during the post-feedback period. CONCLUSIONS: We developed and validated a patient-derived questionnaire to measure the patient's perception of anaesthesia quality. PONV, postoperative pain management, and communication with the anaesthetist are the most important features of the patient's experience. Feedback of PQA performance scores to anaesthetists can lead to improved patient experience.

Two-dimensional mapping to assess direction and magnitude of needle tip error in ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia.

We assessed whether echogenic needles reduce tip location error, by comparing three echogenic designs (Pajunk Sonoplex, Lifetech, B. Braun Stimuplex D+) with a non-echogenic control (Pajunk Uniplex), using a novel assessment technique in unembalmed human cadavers. Multiple images were taken of each needle at shallow (15 to 25 degrees), moderate (35 to 45 degrees) and steep (55 to 65 degrees) insertion angles. Twenty anaesthetists with varied experience in ultrasound-guided nerve blocks identified needle tip position and stated their confidence level in estimates. Actual tip position was determined at the time of image generation but concealed from the anaesthetists. Two-dimensional mapping of 'tip-error' involved measurement of the distance and orientation of each clinician's estimate of tip position in relation to the actual tip position. There were no significant differences in confidence or overall needle visibility at shallow insertion angles. At steeper angles, the Sonoplex showed significantly higher confidence and visibility scores. The remaining echogenic designs did not show any significant differences from the non-echogenic control. Objective measurements of tip error followed the same pattern as the subjective data, although were not universally significant. Two-dimensional mapping showed that as needle visibility deteriorated, so precise tip location was lost but the needle shaft/insertion path remained well-identified. As visibility deteriorated further, accuracy in this axis was also lost. When inaccurate, clinicians generally assessed the needle tip to be more superficial and inserted less far than it actually was. This has important implications for the safety of ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia. Effective echogenic needle technology has the potential to address these concerns.

Brugada syndrome--a review of the implications for the anaesthetist.

Brugada syndrome is characterised by specific electrocardiogram changes in the right precordial leads, a structurally normal heart and susceptibility to ventricular arrhythmias that may cause syncope or sudden death in otherwise fit young adults. Perioperative pharmacological and physiological changes may precipitate these events. Arrhythmias and symptoms typically occur at rest or sleep when vagal activity predominates. Although the condition is rare, the implications are serious and may result in death. Individual case reports describe diverse anaesthetic management. In this paper we critically appraise the literature to identify unifying features and determine whether specific management can be recommended. We found 18 clinical reports of anaesthesia including a total of 28 patients, most under general anaesthesia. Those with an implanted defibrillator should have it deactivated. All patients should have external defibrillator pads applied continuously throughout the perioperative period. Electrolyte imbalances should be corrected preoperatively. Propofol infusions for maintenance of general anaesthesia are probably safe if duration and dose are limited. Sevoflurane may be the preferred volatile anaesthetic. Autonomic changes, inadequate analgesia, light anaesthesia and postural changes should be all be minimised. The patient should be warmed or cooled to maintain normothermia. An isoprenaline infusion is advocated for intraoperative ST changes. Regional anaesthesia is possible if the dose is limited and systemic absorption restricted. Lignocaine is the drug of choice while bupivacaine is relatively contraindicated. Ropivacaine is possibly also not safe. Prolonged regional anaesthesia may therefore require continuous catheter techniques. Five-lead electrocardiogram monitoring and ST trend analysis should continue into the postoperative period.

Regional anaesthesia for bilateral upper limb surgery: a review of challenges and solutions.

Regional anaesthesia for bilateral upper limb surgery can be challenging, yet surgeons are becoming increasingly interested in performing bilateral procedures at the same operation. Anaesthetists have traditionally avoided bilateral brachial plexus block due to concerns about local anaesthetic toxicity, phrenic nerve block and pneumothorax. We discuss these three concerns and review whether advances in ultrasound guidance and nerve catheter techniques should make us reconsider our options. A search of Medline and EMBASE from 1966 to January 2009 was conducted using multiple search terms to identify techniques of providing anaesthesia or analgesia for bilateral upper limb surgery and potential side-effects. Ultrasound imaging and nerve catheter techniques have led to a reduction in dose requirements for effective blocks without side-effects. Effective regional anaesthesia can be performed for bilateral surgery while remaining within recommended safe dose limits. Spacing blocks apart in time can further reduce potential toxicity issues, such that peak absorption rates for each block do not coincide. Since phrenic nerve block remains an issue even with low doses of local anaesthesia, bilateral interscalene blocks are still not recommended. Peripheral nerve blocks have excellent safety profiles and are ideal for ultrasound guidance. Regional anaesthesia can be a suitable option for bilateral upper limb surgery.

Anaesthesia non-technical skills: Can anaesthetists be trained to reliably use this behavioural marker system in 1 day?

BACKGROUND: Performance assessment is becoming increasingly necessary in the medical workplace. Hospitals and patients expect safety, and under-performance by a doctor can compromise standards. By describing and quantifying performance, positive behaviour can be encouraged and unsafe behaviour remedied. Anaesthesia Non-Technical Skills (ANTS) is a behavioural marker system that can be used to assess non-technical skills in the workplace. METHODS: We determined whether specialist anaesthetists could be reliably trained to use ANTS at an assessor level in an 8 h programme. Unscripted videos of routine anaesthesia were produced for training and assessment purposes. Twenty-six participants attended rater training. Exercises in behaviour observation, rater error, frame of reference and performance dimension, and the use of ANTS were conducted throughout the day. Five videos were selected for formal assessment and data collected. Intra-class correlations (ICCs) were calculated for each element. RESULTS: The accepted value of r>0.7 was not reached. ICC calculated for each element was 0.11-0.62. Comparison of participants scores with those of expert raters showed poor agreement. CONCLUSIONS: Anaesthetists could not be trained to reliably use ANTS as a summative assessment tool using our 1 day programme. There was an inadequate correlation of scores between participants and experts. Two major problems contributed to the lack of agreement. Observed behaviours were often misclassified into the incorrect element and safety beliefs varied among anaesthetists. Other reasons for the failure to achieve success and potential future direction are discussed.

Influence of leg position on the depth and sonographic appearance of the sciatic nerve in volunteers.

We investigated the effect of leg position on the depth of the sciatic nerve and quality of ultrasound images taken at the proximal and mid-thigh level. Twenty-one volunteers with average body mass index were recruited to represent the younger population receiving sciatic nerve blocks for sports injury surgery. The volunteers were placed in the lateral position, with the hip flexed and with the hip in a neutral (extended) position. A single operator imaged the uppermost leg and the best images of the sciatic nerve at the proximal and mid-thigh level were saved. Sciatic nerve depth was measured at each level. Eleven clinicians experienced in ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia assessed the paired images. In the proximal thigh, the sciatic nerve depth was greater with the hip flexed compared to the neutral position (median 30 vs 23 mm, P = 0.0002). There was no consistent difference in the mid-thigh. More clinicians favoured the proximal sciatic image with the leg in the neutral position. Although statistically significant, the depth difference is probably not a major clinical consideration in most patients with an average body mass index. We suggest clinicians place the leg in the most ergonomically favourable position when performing sciatic nerve blocks in the proximal thigh in these patients.

Epidural abscesses.

Until recently epidural abscess was considered a rare, almost theoretical, complication of central nerve block, but anecdotal reports suggest that this is no longer the case. Thus a review of the risk factors, pathogenesis, clinical features and outcome of this condition is appropriate, the primary aim being to make recommendations on best anaesthetic practice to minimize the risk of this serious complication. A search of EMBASE(c), PUBMED(c) and MEDLINE(c) databases from 1966 to September 2004 was performed using several strategies, supplemented by reference list screening. Spontaneous epidural abscess is rare, accounting for 0.2-1.2 cases per 10,000 hospital admissions per year. Estimates of the incidence after central nerve block vary from 1:1,000 to 1:100,000. Risk factors (compromised immunity, spinal column disruption, source of infection) are present in the majority of patients, whether the condition is spontaneous or associated with central nerve block. Presentation is vague, fever and back pain usually preceding neurological deficit. Diagnosis requires a high index of suspicion and modern imaging techniques. Treatment involves early surgical drainage to prevent permanent deficit and high dose parenteral antibiotics chosen with bacteriological advice. Primary prevention depends on proper use of full aseptic precautions. Epidural abscess can be a catastrophic consequence of central nerve block. Early diagnosis will minimize permanent damage, but primary prevention should be the aim. There is a need for a large survey to indicate the true incidence to better inform the risk-benefit ratio for central nerve block.

Comparison of plain and hyperbaric solutions of ropivacaine for spinal anaesthesia.

BACKGROUND: Preliminary work has shown that ropivacaine provides spinal anaesthesia of shorter duration than bupivacaine, and may be of particular use in the day-case setting. However, there are few data comparing the actions of plain and hyperbaric solutions of this drug. METHODS: Forty ASA grade I-II patients undergoing elective perineal surgery under spinal anaesthesia were randomized to receive 3 ml ropivacaine 5 mg ml(-1), either in plain solution or with glucose 50 mg ml(-1). The extent and duration of sensory and motor block, pulse rate, blood pressure, and time to mobilization were recorded. RESULTS: Two patients (one per group) were withdrawn because of total block failure. There were significant differences in median time to onset of sensory block at T10 (plain 10 min; hyperbaric 5 min; P<0.01), median maximum extent (plain T8; hyperbaric T4; P<0.05), and median duration of sensory block at T10 (plain 25 min; hyperbaric 115 min; P<0.001). However, median times to complete regression of both sensory (270 vs 240 min; P<0.05) and motor (180 vs 120 min; P<0.001) block were longer in the plain group. Patients therefore mobilized sooner in the hyperbaric group (218 [n=16] vs 286 min [n=17]; P<0.01). All the hyperbaric blocks were adequate for surgery, but three patients receiving plain ropivacaine required general anaesthesia. CONCLUSION: Addition of glucose 50 mg ml(-1) to ropivacaine 5 mg ml(-1) increases the speed of onset, block reliability, duration of useful block for perineal surgery, and speed of recovery. Plain solutions are less reliable for surgery above a dermatomal level of L1.

Efficacy and safety of sedation with propofol in peribulbar anaesthesia.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a sub-anaesthetic dose of propofol for reducing patient recall of peribulbar block in eye surgery. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients scheduled for elective cataract extraction or trabeculectomy using peribulbar anaesthesia with an intravenous bolus of propofol to provide sedation during the administration of the block. The dose of propofol was based on age and body weight. Patients' vital signs were monitored with continuous pulse oximetry and blood pressure measurements. Efficacy of sedation was assessed by recording patient's recall of the anaesthetic block after 8-10 min. RESULTS: Data from 2043 patients were analysed. The dose of propofol used ranged from 15-75 mg. Propofol was effective in abolishing recall in 87.5% of the patients studied. Only four patients required airway support but no major systemic side effects were encountered. CONCLUSIONS: A single sub-anaesthetic dose of propofol prior to administering peribulbar block is effective in reducing recall of the injection and safe without major systemic side effects.

Airway obstruction with cricoid pressure and lateral tilt.

We studied the effect of cricoid pressure and lateral tilt on airway patency during ventilation by facemask in a simulated obstetric setting. The lungs of 50 patients were ventilated by facemask and Guedel airway using a Nuffield Penlon 200 ventilator and Bain system with standard settings. Expired tidal volumes and peak inspiratory pressures were recorded for 10 breaths in each of four combinations: supine with no cricoid pressure, supine with cricoid pressure, 15 degrees lateral tilt with no cricoid pressure and 15 degrees lateral tilt with cricoid pressure. The timing of cricoid pressure was randomised and blinded to all observers. In both supine and tilted positions, cricoid pressure produced a reduction in tidal volume (p < 0.001) and an increase in peak inspiratory pressure (p < 0.001). Cricoid pressure with lateral tilt did not produce any additional airway obstruction to that in the supine position. Complete airway obstruction (tidal volume < 200 ml) resulted on three occasions, all with cricoid pressure applied.