Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Pediatr Radiol ; 51(13): 2442-2457, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34532816

ABSTRACT

Ultrasonography (US) is the first-line imaging modality for screening neonates and young infants with suspected spinal abnormalities. Whether performed for a suspicious congenital skin lesion, such as a lumbosacral tract or lipomatous mass, or abnormal neurological findings, US can help define spinal anatomy, characterize congenital spine malformations, and direct further work-up and management. The purpose of this article is to review the diagnostic imaging approach to infant spine US, including technique and indications, normal anatomy and variants with a focus on embryological origins, and classification and diagnosis of congenital spine malformations.


Subject(s)
Lipoma , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Spine/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography
2.
J Surg Res ; 216: 18-25, 2017 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28807205

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: 3-dimensional prints (3DP) anecdotally facilitate surgeon understanding of anatomy and decision-making. However, the actual benefit to surgeons or patients has not been quantified. This study investigates how surgeon understanding of complex anatomy is altered by a 3DP compared to computed tomography (CT) scan or CT + digital reconstruction (CT + DR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Key anatomic features were segmented from a CT-abdomen/pelvis of pygopagus twins to build a DR and printed in color on a 3D printer. Pediatric surgery trainees and attendings (n = 21) were tested regarding anatomy identification and their understanding of point-to-point distances, scale, and shape. RESULTS: There was no difference between media regarding point-to-point distances. The 3DP led to an increased number of correct answers for questions of scale and shape compared to CT (P < 0.05). CT + DR performance was intermediate but not statistically different from 3DP or CT. Identification of anatomy was inconsistent between media; however, answers were significantly closer to correct when using the 3DP. Participants completed the test faster with the 3DP (6.6 ± 0.5 min) (P < 0.05) than with CT (18.9 ± 2.5 min) or CT + 3DR (14.9 ± 1.5 min). CONCLUSIONS: Although point-to-point measurements were not different, 3DP increased the understanding of shape, scale, and anatomy. It enabled understanding significantly faster than other media. In difficult surgical cases with complex anatomy and a need for efficient multidisciplinary coordination, 3D printed models should be considered for surgical planning.


Subject(s)
Abdomen/anatomy & histology , Models, Anatomic , Pediatrics/education , Pelvis/anatomy & histology , Printing, Three-Dimensional , Specialties, Surgical/education , Twins, Conjoined , Clinical Competence , Humans , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Ohio , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...