Comparing the efficacy of three techniques to reduce isoagglutinin titers in AB0 incompatible kidney transplant recipients.

ABO incompatible (ABOi) organ transplantation requires pre-transplant reduction of the recipient's IgG and IgM isoagglutinin titer against the donor to prevent hyperacute rejection. Over the past four years we primarily used unspecific IgG immunoadsorption (IA) for this purpose and combined this selectively with membrane filtration (IAc) to reduce IgM isoagglutinines. In patients with an initial IgG titer against donor below 1:64, plasma exchange (PE) was initiated. In this retrospective analysis covering January 2012 to August 2015 we compared how efficiently IgG and IgM isoagglutinines in a total of 22 ABOi kidney transplant recipients were reduced by either IA (n = 75 sessions), IAc (n = 14 sessions) or PE (n = 40 sessions). Median pre-treatment IgG isoagglutinin titers were 32 (4-4096) while IgM titers were 16 (1-256) respectively. Mean IgG reduction by either treatment modality was 1.3 ± 0.9 (IA), 1.8 ± 1.0 (IAc) and 2.6 ± 1.3 (PE) titer steps per session (p < 0.001 IA vs. PE; p < 0.04 PE vs. IAc). Mean IgM reduction was 0.6 ± 0.6 (IA), 1.8 ± 0.8 (IAc) and 2.4 ± 1.9 (PE) titer steps (p < 0.001 for both IA vs. PE and IA vs. IAc). Our data indicate that PE efficiently removed IgG- and IgM isoagglutinines. By processing only half the plasma volume per treatment PE was twice as effective as IA in terms of IgG-type isoagglutinin removal in our patient group. This is best explained by the presence of soluble AB0 antigens in the FFP used as plasma replacement. These advantages in efficacy have to be weighed against the potential hazards of PE. Combination of IA and plasma filtration effectively removes IgM-type and even enhances net IgG-type isoagglutinin elimination compared to IA alone. When trying to avoid PE, combined application of IA and IAc is a possible and effective way to reduce isoagglutinin titers before ABOi transplantation.

HPC enumeration with the Sysmex XE-2100 can guide further flow cytometric CD34(+) measurements and timing of leukaphereses.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether HPC counts measured with the hematology analyzer can predict CD34+ levels in peripheral blood and in the apheresis product, as detected by standard flow cytometry. The main focus was the evaluation of HPC counts in poor mobilizers. METHODS: Progenitor cell quantification was performed measuring HPC counts provided by the Sysmex XE-2100 hematology analyzer and CD34+ counts obtained in parallel by flow cytometry. Peripheral blood of patients who had received chemotherapy and G-CSF (142 measurements) and healthy donors mobilized with G-CSF alone (106 measurements) was investigated HPC counts in peripheral blood were also correlated with apheresis yield. RESULTS: HPC counts were significantly higher than CD34+ counts (3.5 fold inpatients and 1.7 fold in healthy donors, p= 0.0015). Our data indicate that HPC counts < or = 10/microL in pretreated patients predict a low probability of adequate CD34+ counts in peripheral blood and yields < 2 x 10(6)/kg in subsequent aphereses. Furthermore, repetitive low HPC enumerations in an individual were followed by insufficientCD34+ counts in peripheral blood or aphereses in 81% of investigations. In healthy donors low HPC counts (< or = 10/microL; 12/106 measurements) did not exclusively predict low CD34+ counts (median 23/microL). DISCUSSION: HPC counts can be used to schedule the start of CD34+ measurements(threshold > 10 HPC/microL) in patients mobilized after chemotherapy for autologous donation. Thus, expensive and time-consuming CD34+ enumerations can perhaps be minimized HPC measurements cannot completely replace flow cytometric CD34+ enumeration. In particular healthy stem-cell donors should be monitored with both methods to exclude false negative HPC measurements.