The Effect of Multidomain Interventions on Global Cognition, Symptoms of Depression and Apathy - A Pooled Analysis of Two Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular risk factors and lifestyle factors are associated with an increased risk of cognitive decline and dementia in observational studies, and have been targeted by multidomain interventions. OBJECTIVES: We pooled individual participant data from two multi-domain intervention trials on cognitive function and symptoms of depression to increase power and facilitate subgroup analyses. DESIGN: Pooled analysis of individual participant data. SETTING: Prevention of Dementia by Intensive Vascular Care trial (preDIVA) and Multidomain Alzheimer Preventive Trial (MAPT). PARTICIPANTS: Community-dwelling individuals, free from dementia at baseline. INTERVENTION: Multidomain interventions focused on cardiovascular and lifestyle related risk factors. MEASUREMENTS: Data on cognitive functioning, depressive symptoms and apathy were collected at baseline, 2 years and 3-4 years of follow-up as available per study. We analyzed crude scores with linear mixed models for overall cognitive function (Mini Mental State Examination [MMSE]), and symptoms of depression and apathy (15-item Geriatric Depression Scale). Prespecified subgroup analyses were performed for sex, educational level, baseline MMSE <26, history of hypertension, and history of stroke, myocardial infarction and/or diabetes mellitus. RESULTS: We included 4162 individuals (median age 74 years, IQR 72, 76) with a median follow-up duration of 3.7 years (IQR 3.0 to 4.1 years). No differences between intervention and control groups were observed on change in cognitive functioning scores and symptoms of depression and apathy scores in the pooled study population. The MMSE declined less in the intervention groups in those with MMSE <26 at baseline (N=250; MD: 0.84; 95%CI: 0.15 to 1.54; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We found no conclusive evidence that multidomain interventions reduce the risk of global cognitive decline, symptoms of depression or apathy in a mixed older population. Our results suggest that these interventions may be more effective in those with lower baseline cognitive functioning. Extended follow-up for dementia occurrence is important to inform on the potential long-term effects of multidomain interventions.

Predictive value of traditional risk factors for cardiovascular disease in older people: A systematic review.

With increasing age, associations between traditional risk factors (TRFs) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) shift. It is unknown which mid-life risk factors remain relevant predictors for CVD in older people. We systematically searched PubMed and EMBASE on August 16th 2019 for studies assessing predictive ability of >1 of fourteen TRFs for fatal and non-fatal CVD, in the general population aged 60+. We included 12 studies, comprising 11 unique cohorts. TRF were evaluated in 2 to 11 cohorts, and retained in 0-70% of the cohorts: age (70%), diabetes (64%), male sex (57%), systolic blood pressure (SBP) (50%), smoking (36%), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL) (33%), left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) (33%), total cholesterol (22%), diastolic blood pressure (20%), antihypertensive medication use (AHM) (20%), body mass index (BMI) (0%), hypertension (0%), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (0%). In studies with low to moderate risk of bias, systolic blood pressure (SBP) (80%), smoking (80%) and HDL cholesterol (60%) were more often retained. Model performance was moderate with C-statistics ranging from 0.61 to 0.77. Compared to middle-aged adults, in people aged 60+ different risk factors predict CVD and current prediction models perform only moderate at best. According to most studies, age, sex and diabetes seem valuable predictors of CVD in old-age. SBP, HDL cholesterol and smoking may also have predictive value. Other blood pressure and cholesterol related variables, BMI, and LVH seem of very limited or no additional value. Without competing risk analysis, predictors are overestimated.

[Is dementia preventable through intensive vascular care? The preDIVA trial]. / Is dementie te voorkomen door intensieve vaatzorg?

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether intensive vascular care in GP practices can prevent dementia in a population of community-dwelling older people. METHOD: This pragmatic cluster-randomised open-label study (ISRCTN29711771) was conducted in persons aged 70-78 years who were registered with Dutch GP practices. The only exclusion criteria were a diagnosis of dementia and limited life expectancy. Practices were randomly assigned to an intervention arm or a control arm. Participants in the interventional arm underwent a cardiovascular check-up every 4 months for six years by a practice nurse. Primary outcomes were cumulative incidence of dementia and functional limitations. Main secondary outcomes were the incidence of cardiovascular disease and mortality. RESULTS: Between June 2006 and March 2009, 116 GP practices (3526 participants) were recruited and randomly assigned: 63 (1890 participants) to the intervention group and 53 (1636 participants) to the control group. Primary outcome data were obtained for 3454 (98%) participants; median follow-up was 6.7 years. In this period, dementia was diagnosed in 121/1853 (6.5%) participants in the intervention group and in 112/1601 (7.0%) participants in the control group. This difference was not significant (hazard ratio 0.92, 95% CI 0.71-1.19). No differences were found with regard to functional decline, incident cardiovascular disease and mortality. CONCLUSION: Long-term intensive vascular care for community-dwelling elderly patients, provided in a primary care setting, does not result in a reduced incidence of dementia, functional limitations or mortality. There is, however, possibly an effect in elderly patients with untreated or sub-optimally treated hypertension; this warrants further research.