Variations in assessment and certification in postgraduate anaesthesia training: a European survey.

BACKGROUND: Postgraduate specialty training has traditionally been based on a time- and rotation-based model, but competency-based models are emerging. Because anaesthesia training evolves differently across Europe, variations in assessment and certification processes are expected, but the extent of similarities and differences is unknown. The aim of this study was to compare anaesthesia training programmes in Europe, focusing on assessment and certification processes. METHODS: We performed an online survey among national representatives of the Union of European Medical Specialists/European Board of Anaesthesiology. RESULTS: All 36 countries participated. Duration of training had a median of 5 yr (range 2.75-7). Mean number of different assessment tools was 7.45 (range 4-13), with more tools being used in competency-based programmes [mean 9.1 (sd 2.97) vs 7.0 (sd 1.97); P=0.03]. Most countries had a nationally uniform certification process. Based on a qualitative analysis of the survey findings, a categorization of countries emerged, reflecting the approach to assessment and certification. We observed two main streams of countries with an underlying knowledge or procedural focus within a time- and rotation-based apprenticeship model. These main streams are evolving, to different extents, towards a third orientation, competency-based training. CONCLUSIONS: Assessment and certification processes in European anaesthesia training are diverse. In many countries, a time-based apprenticeship model is evolving towards a competency-based certification process. This diversity precludes comparison of competence of graduating anaesthetists across Europe.

Delay to carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis.

OBJECTIVE: In patients with recently symptomatic carotid artery stenosis, guidelines recommend carotid revascularization within 2 weeks of the index event. The "index event" may be defined as either the first or the most recent event. The delay between the index event and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) over a period of 6 years in a single centre was evaluated and the effect of defining the index event as either the first or the most recent event was assessed. DESIGN: Observational study. METHODS: 555 consecutive patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis ≥ 50% treated with CEA between 2007 and 2012 were assessed. In 2010, changes to the in-hospital process of care to reduce delays in referral and CEA were introduced. These changes included, for example, improving access to physicians, imaging, and operating rooms. The delay from symptoms to surgery was expressed in days. RESULTS: The median time between the first event and surgery was reduced from 53 days (interquartile range [IQR] 30-78) in 2007 to 21 days (IQR 12-45) in 2012, and between the most recent event and CEA from 45 days (IQR 28-67) to 17 days (IQR 9-28). Patients referred directly by their general practitioner more often underwent CEA within 2 weeks than patients referred by specialists from other hospitals. Compared to patients with transient ischaemic attack or ocular symptoms, patients with ischaemic stroke more often underwent CEA within 2 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: A small change in the process of care significantly reduced the delay from the index event to CEA, but in 2012 it still exceeded 14 days in the majority of patients. The definition of the "index event" has a large impact on the total duration of delay, and should therefore be uniform across studies.

Effects of the introduction of the WHO "Surgical Safety Checklist" on in-hospital mortality: a cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of implementation of the WHO's Surgical Safety Checklist on mortality and to determine to what extent the potential effect was related to checklist compliance. BACKGROUND: Marked reductions in postoperative complications after implementation of a surgical checklist have been reported. As compliance to the checklists was reported to be incomplete, it remains unclear whether the benefits obtained were through actual completion of a checklist or from an increase in overall awareness of patient safety issues. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 25,513 adult patients undergoing non-day case surgery in a tertiary university hospital. Hospital administrative data and electronic patient records were used to obtain data. In-hospital mortality within 30 days after surgery was the main outcome and effect estimates were adjusted for patient characteristics, surgical specialty and comorbidity. RESULTS: After checklist implementation, crude mortality decreased from 3.13% to 2.85% (P = 0.19). After adjustment for baseline differences, mortality was significantly decreased after checklist implementation (odds ratio [OR] 0.85; 95% CI, 0.73-0.98). This effect was strongly related to checklist compliance: the OR for the association between full checklist completion and outcome was 0.44 (95% CI, 0.28-0.70), compared to 1.09 (95% CI, 0.78-1.52) and 1.16 (95% CI, 0.86-1.56) for partial or noncompliance, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of the WHO Surgical Checklist reduced in-hospital 30-day mortality. Although the impact on outcome was smaller than previously reported, the effect depended crucially upon checklist compliance.

Hypotension in anaesthetized patients during aneurysm clipping: not as bad as expected?

BACKGROUND: Patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) often have disturbed autoregulation of cerebral blood flow. A reduction in systemic blood pressure during surgery may therefore lead to delayed cerebral ischaemia (DCI). To assess the incidence and severity of intra-operative hypotension, we performed a retrospective cohort study in 164 patients with recent SAH and surgical clipping of the aneurysm. METHODS: Intra-operative hypotension was defined in three levels of severity, as a decrease in mean arterial pressure (DeltaMAP) of more than 30%, 40% or 50% compared with the pre-operative pressure. For each patient the total amount of time with intra-operative hypotension was retrieved. Logistic regression analysis was performed to study the relation between intra-operative hypotension and the occurrence of DCI and poor outcome. RESULTS: A period with DeltaMAP>30% occurred in 128 patients (78%) with a median duration of this period of 105 min (25-75 per thousand 50-171 min). DeltaMAP>40% occurred in 88 patients (54%) and DeltaMAP>50% occurred in 22 patients (13%). In univariate analysis, DeltaMAP>50% was associated with poor outcome. After adjusting for age and World Federation of Neurological Surgeons grade, the association with poor outcome was no longer statistically significant [odds ratio (OR) 1.018; 95% CI 0.996-1.041]. CONCLUSION: Hypotension during surgical clipping of intracranial aneurysms occurred frequently. In our study population of patients mostly in good clinical condition, hypotension was not confirmed as an independent risk factor for DCI or poor outcome. Anaesthesia may have had a cerebral protective effect.

CT after subarachnoid hemorrhage: relation of cerebral perfusion to delayed cerebral ischemia.

BACKGROUND: Delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) after subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is difficult to predict. The authors studied the relation between several parameters of brain perfusion at admission and development of DCI. METHODS: The authors analyzed the admission CT perfusion (CTP) scans of 46 patients scanned within 72 hours after SAH. They assessed cerebral blood volume (CBV) and flow (CBF), mean transit time (MTT), and time to peak (TTP) for eight predefined regions of interest. For patients with and without DCI, the authors compared perfusion quantitatively and semiquantitatively. With receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curves, the authors assessed the relationship between DCI and perfusion parameters. To assess the potential prognostic value, they calculated sensitivity and specificity of optimal threshold values for the semiquantitative data. RESULTS: DCI was not significantly related with quantitative perfusion values. For the semiquantitative data, patients with DCI had significantly more asymmetry in perfusion, and ROC curves indicated a good relation (0.75 to 0.81). Optimal threshold values distinguishing between patients with and without DCI were 0.77 for CBV and 0.72 for CBF ratios, and 0.87 seconds for MTT and 1.0 second for TTP differences. The corresponding sensitivity was 0.75 for all parameters; the specificity was 0.70 for CBV, 0.93 for CBF, 0.70 for MTT, and 0.90 for TTP. CONCLUSIONS: Delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) is related to perfusion asymmetry on admission CT perfusion (CTP). The cerebral blood flow ratio (comparing contralateral regions of interest) seems the best prognosticator for development of DCI. Further studies are needed to investigate the additional value of CTP to other prognosticators for DCI and to validate the chosen threshold values.

Computer interview for screening blood donors for risk of HIV transmission.

To test the ability of a computer-based interview to detect factors related to the risk of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) among potential blood donors, and to determine donor reactions to the use of the computer, we compared the rate of detection of HIV-related factors elicited by the computer interview with the rate elicited by standard American Red Cross procedures (written questionnaires and face-to-face interviews) for assessment of donor suitability. The study was performed at a Red Cross blood donor center and a hospital. A consecutive sample of 294 male and female blood donors 18 to 75 years of age participated in a randomized crossover trial in which the order of the two methods was reversed. Among 272 prospective donors who provided complete data, the computer identified 12 who reported either behavior associated with a risk of acquiring HIV or symptoms compatible with AIDS. None of these 12 was so identified by face-to-face interviews or written questionnaires. Only one used the confidential unit exclusion procedure to prevent use of his donated blood. Tests for antibody to HIV were negative in blood from all 272 subjects. The subjects enjoyed the computer interview and judged it to be more private than the standard method for donor assessment.

Computer-based interview for screening blood donors for risk of HIV transmission.

OBJECTIVE: To test the ability of a computer-based interview to detect factors related to the risk of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) among potential blood donors and to determine donor reactions to the use of the interview. DESIGN: A comparison of the rate of detection of HIV-related factors elicited by a computer interview with that obtained by standard American Red Cross procedures for assessment of donor suitability, including a randomized crossover trial in which the order of the two methods was reversed. Information obtained by the computer was not available to influence the use of blood components for transfusion. SETTING: The computer interview was administered to donors at an American Red Cross blood donor center and at a mobile blood drive at a hospital. SUBJECTS: Consecutive sample of 294 male and female blood donors 18 to 75 years of age. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Subjects' responses to the computer-based interview as well as responses to the standard Red Cross written questionnaires and face-to-face interviews were used for donor assessment. RESULTS: The interview took an average of 8 minutes to complete. From among 272 donors who provided complete data, the computer identified 12 donors who reported either behaviors associated with a risk of HIV acquisition or symptoms compatible with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome; none of these donors had been so identified either by routine written questionnaires or by face-to-face interviews used to screen potential blood donors. Only one of the 12 identified donors used the confidential unit exclusion procedure to prevent use of his donated unit. The rate of elicitation of HIV-related factors by the computer interview was 12 (4.4%) of 272 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.3% to 7.6%), compared with two (0.13%) of 1536 (95% confidence upper bound, 0.28%) using the standard Red Cross procedure (P less than .0001). Tests for antibodies to HIV were negative in blood samples from all of the 272 subjects studied. The subjects enjoyed the computer interview and judged it to be more private than the standard donor assessment method. They also predicted that donors would be more honest with the computer interview than with a human interviewer. CONCLUSIONS: Computer-based screening elicits more HIV-related factors in the health histories of blood donors than do the standard questionnaire and interviewing methods currently in use. Computer-based screening is also acceptable to blood donors.

Anaphylaxis to human serum albumin.

During her 26th week of pregnancy a 20-year-old woman developed generalized pruritus, urticaria, flushing, tinnitus, and tachycardia during plasmapheresis with 5% human serum albumin (HSA) as adjunctive treatment for anti-Kell isoimmunization. The reaction was controlled with intravenous diphenhydramine. Despite pretreatment with diphenhydramine and betamethasone a subsequent attempt to perform plasmapheresis with infusion of 5% HSA resulted in a more severe reaction which progressed to respiratory distress. Intradermal skin testing with 5% HSA produced a 9 x 11-mm wheal and 17 x 21-mm erythema at 15 minutes. An enzyme-linked immunoassay was positive for IgE antibody to 5% HSA before and after dialysis for removal of Na caprylate. These results are consistent with an IgE-mediated basis for this patient's reaction to HSA.

Bacteriuria screening by use of acridine orange-stained smears.

Acridine orange (AO)-stained smears of 1,042 urine specimens were examined for the presence of bacteria and compared with quantitative culture results. The detection of one or more organisms per three AO fields at X200 magnification was noted in 161 of 162 and 193 of 195 urine specimens that grew greater than 10(5) and 10(4) CFU/ml, respectively, of a clinically relevant organism. However, a high number of false-positive AO smears (356 and 324, respectively) was observed among urines that failed to grow organisms at 10(5) and 10(4) CFU/ml. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of AO smears were 99, 58, 26, and 99%, respectively, for cultures of greater than or equal to 10(5) CFU/ml and 98, 59, 32, and 99%, respectively for cultures of greater than or equal to 10(4) CFU/ml. Despite the poor specificity of the AO smear, the very high negative predictive value would allow for the ruling out of bacteriuria defined at 10(4) CFU/ml and would eliminate the need for culture of ca. 50% of the urine specimens in this study. Employment of the rapid, inexpensive AO procedure only as a means to eliminate specimens for culture would allow significant cost savings and permit the laboratory to send out a large number of potentially negative or low-count urine results within a short time of specimen receipt.