Variants of Unknown Significance in Maturity-Onset Diabetes of the Young: High Rate of Conundrum Resolution via Variants of Unknown Significance Reanalysis.

INTRODUCTION: In the era of next-generation sequencing, clinicians frequently encounter variants of unknown significance (VUS) in genetic testing. VUS may be reclassified over time as genetic knowledge grows. We know little about how best to approach VUS in the maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY). Therefore, our study aimed to determine the utility of reanalysis of previous VUS results in genetic confirmation of MODY. METHODS: A single-center retrospective chart review identified 85 subjects with a MODY clinical diagnosis. We reanalyzed genetic testing in 10 subjects with 14 unique VUS on MODY genes that was performed >3 years before the study. Demographic, clinical, and biochemical data was collected for those individuals. RESULTS: After reanalysis, 43% (6/14) of the gene variants were reclassified to a different category: 7% (1/14) were "likely pathogenic" and 36% (5/14) were "benign" or "likely benign." The reclassified pathogenic variant was in HNF1A and all reclassified benign variants were in HNF1A, HNF1B and PDX1. The median time between MODY testing and reclassification was 8 years (range: 4-10 years). CONCLUSION: In sum, iterative reanalyzing the genetic data from VUS found during MODY testing may provide high-yield diagnostic information. Further studies are warranted to identify the optimal time and frequency for such analyses.

A Standardized DNA Variant Scoring System for Pathogenicity Assessments in Mendelian Disorders.

We developed a rules-based scoring system to classify DNA variants into five categories including pathogenic, likely pathogenic, variant of uncertain significance (VUS), likely benign, and benign. Over 16,500 pathogenicity assessments on 11,894 variants from 338 genes were analyzed for pathogenicity based on prediction tools, population frequency, co-occurrence, segregation, and functional studies collected from internal and external sources. Scores were calculated by trained scientists using a quantitative framework that assigned differential weighting to these five types of data. We performed descriptive and comparative statistics on the dataset and tested interobserver concordance among the trained scientists. Private variants defined as variants found within single families (n = 5,182), were either VUS (80.5%; n = 4,169) or likely pathogenic (19.5%; n = 1,013). The remaining variants (n = 6,712) were VUS (38.4%; n = 2,577) or likely benign/benign (34.7%; n = 2,327) or likely pathogenic/pathogenic (26.9%, n = 1,808). Exact agreement between the trained scientists on the final variant score was 98.5% [95% confidence interval (CI) (98.0, 98.9)] with an interobserver consistency of 97% [95% CI (91.5, 99.4)]. Variant scores were stable and showed increasing odds of being in agreement with new data when re-evaluated periodically. This carefully curated, standardized variant pathogenicity scoring system provides reliable pathogenicity scores for DNA variants encountered in a clinical laboratory setting.

The allelic spectrum of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease in over 17,000 individuals with neuropathy.

We report the frequency, positive rate, and type of mutations in 14 genes (PMP22, GJB1, MPZ, MFN2, SH3TC2, GDAP1, NEFL, LITAF, GARS, HSPB1, FIG4, EGR2, PRX, and RAB7A) associated with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT) in a cohort of 17,880 individuals referred to a commercial genetic testing laboratory. Deidentified results from sequencing assays and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) were analyzed including 100,102 Sanger sequencing, 2338 next-generation sequencing (NGS), and 21,990 MLPA assays. Genetic abnormalities were identified in 18.5% (n = 3312) of all individuals. Testing by Sanger and MLPA (n = 3216) showed that duplications (dup) (56.7%) or deletions (del) (21.9%) in the PMP22 gene accounted for the majority of positive findings followed by mutations in the GJB1 (6.7%), MPZ (5.3%), and MFN2 (4.3%) genes. GJB1 del and mutations in the remaining genes explained 5.3% of the abnormalities. Pathogenic mutations were distributed as follows: missense (70.6%), nonsense (14.3%), frameshift (8.7%), splicing (3.3%), in-frame deletions/insertions (1.8%), initiator methionine mutations (0.8%), and nonstop changes (0.5%). Mutation frequencies, positive rates, and the types of mutations were similar between tests performed by either Sanger (n = 17,377) or NGS (n = 503). Among patients with a positive genetic finding in a CMT-related gene, 94.9% were positive in one of four genes (PMP22, GJB1, MPZ, or MFN2).