Influence of Isolated Talonavicular and Subtalar Joint Arthrodesis on Hindfoot Kinematics and Range of Motion During Cadaveric Gait Simulation.

BACKGROUND: Isolated subtalar and talonavicular joint arthrodeses have been associated with adjacent joint arthritis and altered hindfoot kinematics during simplified loading scenarios. However, the effect on kinematics during dynamic activity is unknown. This study assessed changes in subtalar and talonavicular kinematics after isolated talonavicular (TNiso) and subtalar (STiso) arthrodesis, respectively, during stance simulations. METHODS: Fourteen midtibia specimens received either a TNiso or STiso arthrodesis, with 7 randomized to each group. A 6-degree-of-freedom robot sequentially simulated the stance phase for the intact and arthrodesis conditions. Bootstrapped bias-corrected 95% CIs of the talonavicular and subtalar joint kinematics were calculated and compared between conditions. RESULTS: The TNiso decreased subtalar inversion, adduction, and plantarflexion in late stance (P < .05). The subtalar range of motion in the sagittal and coronal planes decreased by 40% (P = .009) and 46% (P = .002), respectively. No significant changes in talonavicular joint kinematics were observed after isolated subtalar arthrodesis; however, the range of motion was reduced by 61% (P = .007) and 50% (P = .003) in the coronal and axial planes, respectively. CONCLUSION: In this model for arthrodesis, changes in subtalar kinematics and motion restriction were observed after isolated talonavicular arthrodesis, and motion restriction was observed after isolated subtalar arthrodesis. Surprisingly, talonavicular kinematics did not appear to change after isolated subtalar arthrodesis. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Both joint fusions substantially decrease the motion of the reciprocal adjacent joint. Surgeons should be aware that the collateral costs with talonavicular fusion appear higher, and it has a significant effect on subtalar kinematics during the toe-off phase of gait.

Passive Eversion Assessment for Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity After Lateral Column Lengthening: A Cadaveric Biomechanical Study.

BACKGROUND: Reduced hindfoot eversion motion has been proposed as a cause of increased lateral foot pressure following lateral column lengthening (LCL) for progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD). A subjective intraoperative assessment of passive eversion has been suggested to help evaluate correction; however, it is unclear how passive eversion correlates with objective measurements of foot stiffness. Our objectives were to quantify the relationship between the maximum passive eversion in hindfoot joints following LCL with plantar pressure during stance and to determine the influence of wedge size on these outcomes. METHODS: Ten cadaveric specimens extending from the mid-tibia distally were tested on a 6-degrees-of-freedom robot to simulate the stance phase of level walking. Five conditions were tested: intact, simulated PCFD, and 3 LCL wedge conditions (4, 6, and 8 mm). Outcomes included the lateral-to-medial forefoot plantar pressure (LM) ratio during stance and the maximum passive eversion measured in the hindfoot joints. Simple linear regressions were performed to evaluate relationships between outcomes and wedge sizes. RESULTS: A strong negative relationship was found between passive subtalar eversion and the LM ratio during stance (r[38] = -0.46; p = 0.0007), but not between passive talonavicular eversion and the LM ratio (r[38] = -0.02; p = 0.37). Wedge size was strongly related to subtalar eversion (r[38] = -0.77; p < 0.0001), talonavicular eversion (r[38] = -0.55; p = 0.0003), and the LM ratio (r[38] = 0.70; p < 0.0001). Increased wedge size resulted in average decreases in subtalar and talonavicular eversion of 1.0° (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.8° to 1.3°) and 1.2° (95% CI: 0.6° to 1.6°), respectively. Increased wedge size also increased the LM ratio by 0.38 (95% CI: 0.25 to 0.50), indicating a lateral shift in plantar pressure. CONCLUSIONS: Decreased hindfoot eversion following LCL was related to increased lateral plantar pressure during stance. Increasing wedge size correlated with decreasing passive hindfoot eversion and increasing lateral plantar pressure, suggesting that intraoperative preservation of eversion motion may be important for preventing excessive lateral loading. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: To avoid overcorrection or undercorrection of the deformity, hindfoot eversion assessment in addition to radiographic evaluation may be important for optimizing the amount of lengthening to achieve successful LCL.

Hindfoot Arthrodeses and the Order of Joint Fixation Influence Tibiotalar Kinematics During Simulated Stance.

BACKGROUND: Although hindfoot arthrodeses relieve pain and correct deformity, they have been associated with progressive tibiotalar degeneration. The objective was to quantify changes in tibiotalar kinematics after hindfoot arthrodeses, both isolated subtalar and talonavicular, as well as double arthrodesis, and to determine if the order of joint fixation affects tibiotalar kinematics. METHODS: Hindfoot arthrodeses were performed in 14 cadaveric mid-tibia specimens. Specimens randomly received isolated fixation of the subtalar or talonavicular joint first, followed by fixation of the remaining joint for the double arthrodesis. A 6-degree-of-freedom robot sequentially simulated the stance phase of level walking for intact, isolated, and double arthrodesis conditions. Tibiotalar kinematic changes were compared for the intact and arthrodesis conditions. A subsequent analysis assessed the effect of the joint fixation order on tibiotalar kinematics. RESULTS: Isolated and double hindfoot arthrodeses increased tibiotalar plantarflexion, inversion, and internal rotation during late stance. Tibiotalar kinematics changes occurring after isolated arthrodesis remained consistent after the double arthrodesis for both the subtalar- and talonavicular-first conditions. The order of joint fixation influenced tibiotalar kinematics through some portions of stance, where the talonavicular-first double arthrodesis increased tibiotalar plantarflexion, eversion, and internal rotation compared to the subtalar-first double. CONCLUSION: Tibiotalar kinematics were modestly altered for all conditions, both isolated and double hindfoot arthrodeses. Changes in tibiotalar kinematics were consistent from the isolated to the double arthrodesis conditions and varied depending on which isolated hindfoot arthrodesis was performed first. Further research is needed to assess the clinical implications of the observed changes in tibiotalar kinematics, particularly as it pertains to the development of adjacent joint arthritis. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These findings may correlate with clinical research that has cited hindfoot arthrodesis as a risk factor for adjacent tibiotalar arthritis. Once either the subtalar or talonavicular joint is fused, avoiding the arthrodesis of the second joint may not necessarily protect the tibiotalar joint.

Orthosis and Foot Structure Affect the Fifth Metatarsal Principal Strains During Simulated Level Walking.

BACKGROUND: Fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal bone are common injuries in elite athletes and are associated with high rates of delayed union and nonunion. Structural features of the foot may increase fracture risk in some individuals, emphasizing the need for intervention strategies to prevent fracture. Although orthotic devices have shown promise in reducing fractures of the fifth metatarsal bone, the effect of orthosis on fifth metatarsal strains is not well understood. PURPOSE: To quantify the effects of different foot orthotic constructs on principal tensile strains in the proximal fifth metatarsal bone during cadaveric simulations of level walking. An additional purpose was to investigate the relationships between structural features of the foot and corresponding strains on the fifth metatarsal bone during level walking. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: A total of 10 midtibial cadaveric specimens were attached to a 6 degrees of freedom robotic gait simulator. Strain gauges were placed at the metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction (zone II) and the proximal diaphysis (zone III) during level walking simulations using 11 different foot orthotic configurations. Images of each specimen were used to measure structural features of the foot in an axially loaded position. The peak tensile strains were measured and reported relative to the sneaker-only condition for each orthotic condition and orthotic-specific association between structural features and principal strains of both zones. RESULTS: In total, 2 of the 11 orthotic conditions significantly reduced strain relative to the sneaker-only condition in zone II. Further, 6 orthotic conditions significantly reduced strain relative to the sneaker-only condition in zone III. Increased zone II principal strain incurred during level walking in the sneaker-only condition showed a significant association with increases in the Meary's angle. Changes in zone III principal strain relative to the sneaker-only condition were significantly associated with increases in the Meary's angle and fourth-fifth intermetatarsal angle. CONCLUSION: The use of orthotic devices reduced principal strain relative to the condition of a sneaker without any orthosis in zone II and zone III. The ability to reduce strain relative to the sneaker-only condition in zone III was indicated by increasing values of the Meary's angle and levels of the fourth-fifth intermetatarsal angle. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Clinicians can use characteristics of foot structure to determine the proper foot orthosis to potentially reduce stress fracture risk in high-risk individuals.