Late Implant Failure in Cervical Disc Arthroplasty (M6-C, Spinal Kinetics) Causing Radiculopathy and Myelopathy. / Spätes Versagen einer zervikalen Bandscheibenprothese (M6-C, Spinal Kinetics) mit Radikulomyelopathie.

Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) is an approved surgical treatment option in selected patients with cervical spinal disc degeneration. Even though CDA is a standard procedure since 20 years, there is a lack of information about long term performance. The published reoperation rates after CDA are low and comparable to anterior cervical fusion. The authors describe a severe failure and dysfunction with a partial core dislocation of a cervical prosthesis into the spinal canal (M6-C, Spinal Kinetics, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Six years after implantation of a cTDR (cervical Total Disk Replacement) of the M6 type at C4/5 level, a 52 year-old women presented herself with new clinical signs of cervical myelopathy and radicular pain. Complete posterior dislocation of the central core of the implant into the spinal canal was identified as a cause. The failed device was removed completely and an ACCF (anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion) was performed. Intraoperatively, rupture of the posterior portion of the mesh tissue with posterior dislocation of the whole prosthesis core was detected. This is the second described case of a severe implant failure with core dislocation in this type of cTDR device. Even though there are thousands of successful implantations and middle term outcomes, it seems to be necessary to continue with long term radiological follow up to exclude similar failure in this type of prosthesis.

[Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion]. / Minimal-invasive transforaminale lumbale interkorporelle Fusion.

OBJECTIVE: Instrumented fusion of lumbar motion segments using a minimally invasive technique. INDICATIONS: Degenerative disc disease, segmental degeneration, degenerative spondylolisthesis, isthmic spondylolisthesis, pseudarthrosis, other spinal lumbar instabilities, disc prolapse, revision for failed back surgery syndrome, unilateral neuroforaminal stenosis, facet joint arthrosis. CONTRAINDICATIONS: High-grade spondylolisthesis (Meyerding grades III/IV, spondyloptosis), bilateral nerve root compression, vertebral fractures, tumors, high-grade spinal instabilities, primary spinal deformities, multilevel pathologies. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Ipsilateral minimally invasive approach using a self-retaining tubular retractor system, partial or complete facetectomy, insertion of pedicle screws, transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) cage insertion preserving nerve roots, fusion, contralateral insertion of pedicle screws using a minimally invasive or percutaneous technique. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Mobilization with physiotherapy, followed by standing plain x­ray examinations, clinical and radiological follow-up at 6-12 weeks and 1 year postoperatively. RESULTS: Fusion rates >90%, comparable to open TLIF. Complication rates lower than open TLIF. Shorter radiation exposure during surgery, lower blood loss. Less surgical trauma leads to shorter hospitalization time and earlier return-to-work. Oswestry Disability index (ODI) scores and visual analog scale (VAS) scores significantly decreased.

Staged surgical treatment for infection of total disc arthroplasty: three cases and a narrative review of the literature.

Although total disc arthroplasty (TDA) is a common procedure for selected cases of degenerative disc disease, until today there are only two cases of TDA infections reported in the literature. We report three cases of postoperative TDA infections, two developed cutaneous fistulas. To eradicate the infectious site, a staged removal of the device, resolute debridement, and stabilization plus fusion is proposed. Surgeons are challenged by (1) major retroperitoneal vessels adherent to the device, (2) surrounding scar tissue, (3) accompanying retroperitoneal abscess, and (4) technical issues when removing and replacing the implant. A staged multidisciplinary team approach involving vascular and plastic surgery as well as spine specialists is mandatory to achieve good results.

Transoral Spine Surgery - an Update. / Die transorale Wirbelsäulenchirurgie ­ ein Update.

Even though in recent years the number of transoral spinal interventions has decreased in Europe and North America - mainly because of the progress in the drug therapy of rheumatism, there are still pathologies that can only be addressed by a transoral approach. The classical transoral approach can be expanded in collaboration with oral-maxillofacial surgery and ear, nose and throat surgery, but this is rarely necessary. The transoral approach is now mainly used for resection of pathological tissue. Additional stabilisation is often necessary and is performed in Europe and North America via a posterior approach, due to the lack of availability of anterior plate systems. Anterior plate systems are still used in India and China. In these countries, the numbers of transoral operations are generally still increasing. Today the indications for transoral spinal surgery consist mainly of infections and tumours, and more rarely of trauma and congenital malformations of the craniocervical junction. The numbers of surgical interventions for these indications has remained constant in recent years. The most recent advancement is the use of endoscopes and transnasal access. With these techniques, additional alternatives and supplements are available for further reducing the morbidity of transoral surgery. Despite the low number of cases, surgical therapy of the corresponding pathologies can be offered to patients with a calculable risk.