Radiographic joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis is associated with differences in cartilage turnover and can be predicted by serum biomarkers: an evaluation from 1 to 4 years after diagnosis.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to determine whether serum biomarkers for degradation and synthesis of the extracellular matrix of cartilage are associated with, and can predict, radiographic damage in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Clinical and radiographic data of 87 RA patients were recorded 1 year after disease onset and then annually up to four years. Serum concentrations of four cartilage biomarkers were determined at these time points: a neoepitope formed by collagenase cleavage of type II collagen (C2C), a neoepitope formed by collagenase cleavage of type II collagen as well as type I collagen (C1,2C), a carboxy propeptide of type II procollagen formed during synthesis (CPII), and a cartilage proteoglycan aggrecan turnover epitope (CS846-epitope). Biomarker concentrations between patients with rapid radiographic progression (>7.3 Sharp/van der Heijde units per year) and those with slow radiographic progression (<2.3 units per year) were compared. In addition, we evaluated the long-term and short-term predictive value of each biomarker for progression of radiographic damage. RESULTS: Patients with rapid radiographic progression had higher C2C, higher C1,2C, and higher CS846-epitope levels than slow progressors. CPII levels showed no differences. Most importantly, the long-term radiographic progression for C2C, for C1,2C, and for CS846-epitope can be predicted by the biomarker value at year 1 after disease onset. C2C was also a predictor for joint space narrowing and annual radiographic damage during the subsequent year. CONCLUSION: This study shows that the concentration of serum biomarkers of cartilage collagen breakdown and proteoglycan turnover, but not of collagen synthesis, are related to joint destruction in RA. The use of these biomarkers may be of value when studying progression of joint damage in patients with RA.

Working status among Dutch patients with rheumatoid arthritis: work disability and working conditions.

OBJECTIVES: To assess work disability and variables associated with work disability among Dutch patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: A questionnaire on working status was filled out by 296 patients of working age. Employment and work disability rates adjusted for age and sex from the Dutch population were determined using indirect standardization. Cox proportional hazard analysis was used to assess baseline predictors of work disability in a subgroup of patients (n = 195). RESULTS: After a mean disease duration of 4.3 yr, patients had a 0.78 (95% CI 0.67-0.88) chance of being employed and a 2.14 (95% CI 1.75-2.54) risk of being work disabled when compared with the Dutch population. Functional disability and job type at the start of the disease were predictors of future work disability. In total, 48 (37%) currently employed patients had changed their working conditions, of which reduced working hours (46%), reduced pacing of work (42%) and help from colleagues (49%) were the most important alterations. Of the 60 work disabled patients without a paid job, only 11 patients (18%) would be willing to work again. CONCLUSION: This study shows that the adjusted employment rates were lower and that work disability rates were higher in patients with RA when compared with the general Dutch population. In addition, a substantial number of employed patients had to change their working conditions due to RA. Only a minority of work disabled RA patients was willing to return to the paid labour force.

Prevalence of vertebral deformities and symptomatic vertebral fractures in corticosteroid treated patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to determine whether the prevalence of vertebral deformities in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with corticosteroids (Cs) is higher than in RA patients not receiving Cs therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This multicentre cross-sectional study included 205 patients with RA who were receiving Cs orally on a daily basis and 205 patients with RA who did not receive Cs, matched for sex and age. Vertebral deformities were scored according to the Kleerekoper method. RESULTS: Vertebral deformities were found in 52 (25%) patients on Cs and in 26 (13%) patients not on Cs. Sixteen (8%) patients in the group on Cs had experienced clinical manifestations of an acute vertebral fracture in the past vs only three patients (1.5%) among those not on Cs. The use of Cs tended to increase the risk of developing a vertebral deformity [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.56, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.81-2.99] and symptomatic vertebral fracture (adjusted OR 1.42, 95% CI 0.24-8.32). Each 1-mg increase in the current daily Cs dose increased the risk of a vertebral deformity (adjusted OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.98-1.13) and of a symptomatic vertebral fracture (adjusted OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.89-1.24). CONCLUSION: There is a higher prevalence of vertebral deformities and clinical manifestations of vertebral fractures in patients on Cs than in those not on Cs. Our data indicate that the use of Cs and each 1-mg increase in the current daily Cs dose may increase the risk of development of a vertebral deformity and symptomatic vertebral fracture in patients with RA.

Aggressive treatment in early rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised controlled trial. On behalf of the Rheumatic Research Foundation Utrecht, The Netherlands.

OBJECTIVES: To compare three therapeutic strategies using slow acting antirheumatic drugs (SAARDs) in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA), for their disease modifying properties, toxicity, and lag time until treatment effect. METHODS: Patients with recent onset RA from six hospitals were randomly assigned to immediate initiation of one of three treatment strategies: (I) a "mild SAARD with a long lag time" (hydroxychloroquine, if necessary replaced by auranofin); (II) a "potent SAARD with a long lag time" (intramuscular gold, if necessary replaced by D-penicillamine); (III) a "potent SAARD with a short lag time" (methotrexate, if necessary replaced by sulfasalazine). Comparisons included two years of follow up. RESULTS: All SAARD strategies reduced mean disease activity. A greater percentage of patients improved clinically with strategies II and III than with strategy I: percentages of patients improved on joint score with strategies II and III (79% and 82%, respectively), which was statistically different from strategy I (66%). The same was true for remission percentages: 31% and 24% v 16%, respectively). Longitudinal analysis showed significantly less disability with strategy III, and a lower erythrocyte sedimentation rate with strategy II than with strategy I. In addition, radiological damage after one and two years, was significantly lower in strategies II and III (at two years median scores were 11 and 10 v 14 in strategy I, p<0.05). Toxicity was increased in strategy II compared with the other strategies. CONCLUSION: Strategy III, comprising methotrexate or sulfasalazine, produced the best results weighing effectiveness and toxicity. Strategy I (hydroxychloroquine or auranofin) was slightly less effective, and strategy II (intramuscular gold or D-penicillamine) was associated with increased toxicity.

Patterns of disease progression in the rheumatoid wrist: a long-term followup.

OBJECTIVE: To identify different patterns of disease manifestation and changes in the rate of progression of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in the wrist. METHODS: Forty wrists, with normal baseline radiographs, of 20 patients with RA were evaluated by means of a retrospective radiographic review for a period of at least 15 years. RESULTS: Radiographical scores for damage (Larsen method) and malalignment (carpal collapse and ulnar translocation index; radial deviation of the wrist and ulnar shift of the fingers) showed progression with increasing disease duration for all patients. Women had higher Larsen scores than men (p < 0.05) and rheumatoid factor positive patients had higher Larsen scores than rheumatoid factor negative patients. For all 3 left-handed patients the dominant scores were somewhat higher than the right-handed scores, but the difference was not significant. For the 17 right-handed patients no differences were found between the dominant and the left hand. Early in the course of the disease 4 types of wrist involvement can be identified on the basis of the first localization of damage in the wrist (central, radial, ulnar, and diffuse type). Radial deviation of the wrist was increased in wrists with "central" involvement compared to wrists with "diffuse" involvement (p < 0.05). Furthermore, radial deviation of the wrist was positively correlated with ulnar drift of the fingers (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Wrist involvement was found to play an important role in the typical rheumatoid deformity of the hand. Early treatment of the wrist is proposed to prevent this deformity.

Effects of rheumatoid arthritis on employment and social participation during the first years of disease in The Netherlands.

OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) on working capabilities and social participation, including non-paying jobs, during the first 6 yr of disease. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: In April 1996, a self-reporting questionnaire was sent to 424 participants of a population-based clinical trial of therapeutic strategies for early RA initiated in 1990. RESULTS: A total of 363 completed questionnaires were returned (response = 86%). Disease duration varied from < 1 to 6 yr (mean 2.8 yr). The employment rate was low in the RA population compared to the Dutch population. In the male 45- to 64-yr-old group, 63% of RA patients were not employed compared to 32% of the Dutch population (P < 0.01). In the female 45- to 64-yr-old group, 76% of the RA population vs 67% of the Dutch were not employed (P < 0.05). Of the employed patients, 59% reported that RA affected their working capabilities, e.g. they worked an average of 21 h per week less due to RA. Of the patients without a paying job, 41% believed that this was (partly) due to RA. In addition, fewer RA patients had non-paying jobs and they performed fewer household activities compared to the general Dutch population. CONCLUSION: RA already has a negative influence on the working capabilities, social participation and household activities of these patients during the first 6 yr of disease.

The effectiveness of early treatment with "second-line" antirheumatic drugs. A randomized, controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare two therapeutic strategies for patients with recent-onset rheumatoid arthritis. DESIGN: Open, randomized clinical trial. SETTING: Outpatient clinics of six clinical centers. PATIENTS: 238 consecutive patients with recently diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis. INTERVENTIONS: Delayed or immediate introduction of treatment with slow-acting antirheumatic drugs (SAARDs). MEASUREMENTS: Primary end points were functional disability, pain, joint score, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate at 6 and 12 months and progression of radiologic abnormalities at 12 months. RESULTS: Statistically significant advantages at 12 months for patients receiving the SAARD strategy (immediate treatment with SAARDs) with regard to all primary end points that may be clinically important are indicated by the differences in improvements from baseline and their 95% CIs. These differences were 0.3 (95% CI, 0.2 to 0.6) for disability (range, 0 to 3), 10 mm (CI, 1 to 19 mm) for pain (range, 0 to 100 mm), 39 (CI, 4 to 74) for joint score (range, 0 to 534), and 11 mm/h (CI, 3 to 19 mm/h) for erythrocyte sedimentation rate (range, 1 to 140 mm/h), all in favor of SAARD treatment. The SAARD strategy also appears to be advantageous at 6 months. Radiologic abnormalities progressed at an equal rate in the SAARD and the non-SAARD groups; the difference in progression (range, 0 to 448) was 1 (CI, -3 to 5). Analyses were based on the intention-to-treat principle and thus included 29% of patients in the non-SAARD group who discontinued the non-SAARD treatment strategy; treatment was usually discontinued because of insufficient effectiveness. The SAARD strategy including two alternative SAARDs could not be continued by 8% of patients, usually because of adverse reactions. CONCLUSIONS: Early introduction of SAARDs may be more beneficial than delayed introduction for patients with recently diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis.

Prediction of progression of radiologic damage in newly diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the extent to which early radiologic damage is predicted by joint inflammation in patients with newly diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Regression analysis was performed on 1-year progression of total radiologic damage for baseline characteristics and cumulative disease activity measures, and the effects of continued joint inflammation on the progression of damage in separate joint groups were investigated. RESULTS: Odds ratios for progression of total damage were 12 for the presence of rheumatoid factor, 5 for the presence of damage at baseline, and 2 for cumulative joint inflammation. A positive association between continued joint inflammation and progression of damage was found to be statistically significant for most joint groups. CONCLUSION: Progression of radiologic damage in patients with newly diagnosed RA is independently associated with the presence of rheumatoid factor and damage at baseline and with cumulative joint inflammation.

Demonstration of calf abnormalities by magnetic resonance imaging in polyarteritis nodosa.

A 36-year-old Caucasian woman presenting with persisting painful calves after a flu-like illness was diagnosed as having polyarteritis nodosa. Magnetic resonance imaging of the lower legs showed abnormal signal intensity of the outer muscle groups with sparing of the central located muscles. The good clinical response to oral prednisone was supported by improvement of MRI.