Stump management after trans-tibial amputation: a systematic review.

In order to achieve stump healing after trans-tibial amputation, various methods are applied, such as soft dressings followed by elastic wrapping of the stump, rigid dressings, semi-rigid dressings, and more recently the application of silicon or gel-liners. A systematic literature search was performed to identify the optimal post-amputation management. The methodological quality of the studies was systematically evaluated by using a predefined list of criteria. Only 11 controlled studies were identified and evaluated for their methodological quality. From these studies, no studies were classified as A-level studies, whereas three were classified as B-level, and 8 were classified as C-level studies. Relevant literature appears heterogeneous with respect to patient selection, intervention and outcome measures. Despite the large variability of included studies, this review reveals a trend in favour of rigid and semi-rigid dressings for achieving stump healing and reduction of stump volume. No conclusions can be drawn with regard to the effect on functional outcome. The literature is not conclusive on the effects of early weight bearing on stump healing, volume reduction, and functional outcome. More research is needed for the development of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines concerning management after transtibial amputation.

Prosthetic prescription in the Netherlands: an interview with clinical experts.

In the process of guideline development for prosthetic prescription in the Netherlands the authors made a study of the daily clinical practice of lower limb prosthetics. Besides the evidence-based knowledge from literature the more implicit knowledge from clinical experts is of importance for guideline development. In order to obtain this information the authors performed both an observational study of clinical practice and an interview study with 11 clinical experts from the three key disciplines in this field. The latter study is presented here as a descriptive and qualitative study. The combination of the opinions on prescription criteria given in these semi-structured interviews appeared divided with regard to various options in the prescription of a lower limb prosthesis. However, the implicit knowledge is considered by the authors of importance for the consensus procedure on guideline development. Prosthetic prescription criteria seem to be based on local experience and partly on assumptions. A consensus procedure can lead to improvement of the knowledge about prosthetic prescription.

Prescription of prosthetic ankle-foot mechanisms after lower limb amputation.

BACKGROUND: A correct prosthetic prescription can be derived from adapting the functional benefits of a prosthesis to the functional needs of the prosthetic user. For adequate matching, the functional abilities of the amputees are of value, as well as the technical and functional aspects of the various prosthetic ankle-foot mechanisms. There seems to be no clear clinical consensus on the precise prescription criteria for the various prosthetic ankle-foot mechanisms related to the functional abilities of amputees. OBJECTIVES: To obtain information about aspects of prosthetic ankle-foot mechanisms and daily functioning of amputees with a prosthesis, for appropriate prosthetic prescription criteria. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Injuries Group specialised register of trials (April 2003), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library issue 1, 2003), MEDLINE (1966 to April 2003), EMBASE (1983 to April 2003), CINAHL (1982 to April 2003) and reference lists of articles. No language restrictions were applied. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised controlled trials and quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing different prosthetic devices for lower limb amputation in adults. No language restrictions were applied. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently identified potential articles from the literature search. Methodological quality was assessed using a checklist comprising 13 criteria. The reviewers extracted data using pre-defined extraction forms. MAIN RESULTS: Twenty-three trials were included, with a total of 217 participants. The methodological quality was moderate. Only one study was of high quality. No classical RCT's were identified, yet, all included studies used cross-over designs allowing sufficient control for confounding. In high activity transfemoral amputees, there is limited evidence for the superiority of the Flex foot during level walking compared with the SACH foot in respect of energy cost and, gait efficiency. This benefit has only been confirmed in transtibial amputees during decline and incline walking and increased walking speeds. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence from high quality comparative studies for the overall superiority of any individual type of prosthetic ankle-foot mechanism. In high activity transfemoral amputees, there is limited evidence for the superiority of the Flex foot during level walking compared with the SACH foot in respect of energy cost and, gait efficiency. This benefit has only been confirmed in transtibial amputees during decline and incline walking and increased walking speeds. In prescribing prosthetic-ankle foot mechanisms for lower-limb amputees, practitioners should take into account availability, patient functional needs, and cost.

Prosthetic prescription in the Netherlands: an observational study.

Prosthetic prescription for lower limb amputees and the methodology used are primarily based on empirical knowledge. Clinical expertise plays an important role that can lead to an adequate prescription; however, a clear evidence based motivation for the choices made cannot be given. This can lead to local prescription variations with regard to overuse or underuse of prosthetic care and a lack of transparency for consumers and health insurance companies. Hence a clinical guideline may lead to a more consistent and efficient clinical practice and thus more uniformly high quality care. The purpose of this study was to get insight into potential similarities in prescription criteria in clinical practice in the Netherlands. Secondly, the authors were interested to know if prosthetic prescription was primarily based on the level of activity or intended use of the prosthesis. As part of the development of a consensus-based clinical guideline a multi-centred, cross-sectional study was carried out in order to observe the prosthetic prescription for a group of lower limb amputees. Therefore prescription data were collected from 151 amputees with trans-femoral amputation, knee disarticulation or trans-tibial amputation. Results of the multiple logistic regression show no relationship between the activity level and any of the variables included in the equation such as the hospital or medical doctor in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (MD in P&RM), prosthetic components, age of the amputee or reason of amputation. The criteria used are merely based on the clinical expertise and local experience whereas the actual prescriptions differ from location to location. In conclusion the development of a clinical guideline for prosthetic prescription in lower limb amputation is recommended. The information gained from this observational study will be used in a clinical guideline procedure for prosthetic prescription in the Netherlands.