Biomechanical evaluation of fixation of the coracoclavicular stand-alone cow-hitch suture reconstruction in comparison to two established techniques for highly unstable distal clavicle fractures (Neer type V).

Background: Treatment of displaced distal clavicle fractures with bony avulsion of the coracoclavicular (CC) ligaments often warrants surgical fixation, yet a gold standard surgical technique is to be defined. The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical fixation strength of a new fixation technique, the CC stand-alone cow-hitch suture reconstruction, and to compare this technique with a clavicle hook plate and a lateral locking plate with CC suture reconstruction. Methods: Simulated Neer type V distal clavicle fractures of the clavicle were created in 18 cadaveric shoulders, which were matched by age and gender in 3 groups: (1) clavicle hook plate (group HP), (2) lateral locking plate fixation with CC suture reconstruction (group LPCC), and (3) CC stand-alone suture reconstruction using the cow-hitch technique (group CH). After preconditioning with 25 N for 10 cycles, the specimens were cycled in the coronal plane for 500 cycles from 10N to 70N. Displacement and ultimate load to failure were documented and analyzed with the data acquisition system. Results: There was a significant difference in the fracture displacement during cyclic loading between the LPCC group and the HP group (0.6 vs. 1.7 mm; P = .02) and between the CH and HP groups (0.5 vs. 1.7 mm; P = .004). Fracture displacement was not different between the LPCC and the CH groups (P = .544). The CH group and the LPCC group showed a significantly higher stiffness compared to the HP group (P < .001 and P = .003, respectively). The CH group showed a significantly higher ultimate load to failure compared with the HP group (429 vs. 172 N; P = .005) and showed a tendency toward higher ultimate load to failure when compared with the LPCC group (429 vs. 258 N; P = .071). Conclusion: The CC stand-alone cow-hitch suture reconstruction and the locking plate with CC reconstruction showed higher fixation strength compared with the hook plate for simulated Neer type V distal clavicle fractures. There was a tendency of higher ultimate load to failure with the cow-hitch technique compared with the lateral locking plate with CC suture reconstruction, and given the potential advantages of less soft tissue stripping, metal-free fixation, low costs, and simple surgical technique, clinical application of the all-suture CC reconstruction using the cow-hitch for Neer type V distal clavicle fractures appears warranted.

Posterior stability of the shoulder depends on acromial anatomy: a biomechanical study of 3D surface models.

PURPOSE: Primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis is commonly associated with static posterior subluxation of the humeral head. Scapulae with static/dynamic posterior instability feature a superiorly and horizontally oriented acromion. We investigated whether the acromion acts as a restraint to posterior humeral translation. METHODS: Five three-dimensional (3D) printed scapula models were biomechanically tested. A statistical shape mean model (SSMM) of the normal scapula of 40 asymptomatic shoulders was fabricated. Next, a SSMM of scapular anatomy associated with posterior subluxation was generated using data of 20 scapulae ("B1"). This model was then used to generate three models of surgical correction: glenoid version, acromial orientation, and acromial and glenoid orientation. With the joint axially loaded (100N) and the humerus stabilized, an anterior translation force was applied to the scapula in 35°, 60° and 75° of glenohumeral flexion. Translation (mm) was measured. RESULTS: In the normal scapula, the humerus translates significantly less to contact with the acromion compared to all other configurations (p < .000 for all comparisons; i.e. 35°: "normal" 8,1 mm (± 0,0) versus "B1" 11,9 mm (± 0,0) versus "B1 Acromion Correction" 12,2 mm (± 0,2) versus "B1 Glenoid Correction" 13,3 mm (± 0,1)). Restoration of normal translation was only achieved with correction of glenoid and acromial anatomy (i.e. 75°: "normal" 11 mm (± 0,8) versus "B1 Acromion Correction" 17,5 mm (± 0,1) versus "B1 Glenoid Correction" 19,7 mm (± 1,3) versus "B1 Glenoid + Acromion Correction" 11,5 mm (± 1,1)). CONCLUSIONS: Persistence or recurrence of static/dynamic posterior instability after correction of glenoid version alone may be related to incomplete restoration of the intrinsic stability that is conferred by a normal acromial anatomy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: biomechanical study.

Fixation of distal clavicle fractures with coracoclavicular instability: a comparative biomechanical study in human cadavers.

BACKGROUND: The need for coracoclavicular (CC) stabilization in the fixation of fractures with CC instability (Neer type IIB and V) was biomechanically demonstrated by higher construct strength than isolated locking plate osteosynthesis. It was the purpose of this study to prove noninferiority of the new cow-hitch suture repair technique compared with the well-established suture tape double-button fixation with regard to overall fixation strength and cyclic loading properties. METHODS: Twelve human cadaver shoulders (7 right and 5 left) were matched for sex and age (mean age: 75 ± 5 years). An oblique parasagittal fracture line 20 mm medial to the acromioclavicular joint line was created, and the CC ligaments were dissected. Six shoulders were reconstructed by a double FiberTape fixation with two suture buttons (group DB), and the remaining six shoulders by a cow-hitch suture repair using a double FiberWire with only coracoid button fixation (group CH). Both reconstruction techniques were tested in a servo-hydraulic material testing machine for cyclic displacement (mm), stiffness (N/mm), and maximum load-to-failure (N) after 500 cycles at 3 mm/s and inferosuperior load between 15 and 70 N. Superior fragment displacement in space was recorded using a MicroScribe digitizer. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences regarding cyclic displacement (group DB: 0.7 mm; group CH: 1.3 mm; P = .36), stiffness (group DB: 177 N/mm; group CH: 116 N/mm; P = .17), maximum load-to-failure (group DB: 560 N; group CH: 492 N; P = .59), and superior displacement in space of the medial fragment (group DB: 3.2 mm; group CH: 1.6 mm; P = .48). CONCLUSION: Fixation of unstable distal clavicle fractures using a double FiberWire cow-hitch suture repair with isolated coracoid button fixation for stand-alone CC stabilization resulted in similar biomechanical properties to a double-suture button fixation with FiberTapes while avoiding prominent clavicular implants.

Biomechanical stability of complex coronal plane fracture fixation of the capitellum.

INTRODUCTION: Coronal plane fractures of the distal humerus are relatively rare and can be challenging to treat due to their complexity and intra-articular nature. There is no gold standard for surgical management of these complex fractures. The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical stability and strength of two different internal fixation techniques for complex coronal plane fractures of the capitellum with posterior comminution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fourteen fresh frozen, age- and gender-matched cadaveric elbows were 3D-navigated osteotomized simulating a Dubberley type IIB fracture. Specimens were randomized into one of two treatment groups and stabilized with an anterior antiglide plate with additional anteroposterior cannulated headless compression screws (group antiGP + HCS) or a posterolateral distal humerus locking plate with lateral extension (group PLP). Cyclic testing was performed with 75 N over 2000 cycles and ultimately until construct failure. Data were analyzed for displacement, construct stiffness, and ultimate load to failure. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in displacement during 2000 cycles (p = 0.291), stiffness (310 vs. 347 N/mm; p = 0.612) or ultimate load to failure (649 ± 351 vs. 887 ± 187 N; p = 0.140) between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Posterolateral distal humerus locking plate achieves equal biomechanical fixation strength as an anterior antiglide plate with additional anteroposterior cannulated headless compression screws for fracture fixation of complex coronal plane fractures of the capitellum. These results support the use of a posterolateral distal humerus locking plate considering the clinical advantages of less invasive surgery and extraarticular metalware. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Biomechanical study.

Arthroscopic single anchor repair techniques for upper third subscapularis tears provide sufficient biomechanical stability.

PURPOSE: Upper third tears of the subscapularis tendon can be repaired successfully with a single anchor according to previous literature. The aim of the present study was to compare three single anchor repair techniques regarding fixation strength, footprint coverage and contact pressure in a biomechanical test set-up on human cadaveric shoulders. METHODS: Eighteen human cadaveric shoulders were randomized in three groups with respect to the repair technique; group 1: knotted lasso-loop mattress, group 2: knotted mattress and group 3: knotless tape repair. Upper third tears of the subscapularis tendon (Lafosse type 2) were created and repairs were performed with additional contact pressure and area measurement using a pressure mapping system. Cyclic testing was performed by loading the subscapularis from 10 to 100 N for 300 cycles. A position-controlled ramp protocol up to 30 and 50 N was used to allow for pressure measurements. Finally, specimens were loaded to failure and failure modes were recorded. RESULTS: The three groups were not significantly different regarding age, gender, bone mineral density at the lesser tuberosity, subscapularis footprint size and defect area created at the upper subscapularis insertion. A significant difference was detected between group 1 (48.6 ± 13.8%) and group 2 (25.9 ± 5.7%) regarding pressurized footprint coverage (p = 0.028). Ultimate load to failure was 630.8 ± 145.3 N in group 1, 586.9 ± 220.7 N in group 2 and 678.2 ± 236.5 N in group 3, respectively. Cyclic displacement was similar in all three groups with an average displacement of 1.2 ± 0.6 mm. The highest stiffness was found in group 1 with 88 ± 30.3, which was not statistically significantly different to group 2 (65 ± 27 N/mm) and group 3 (83.9 ± 32.9 N/mm). The most common mode of failure was suture cut-through at the suture-tendon interface (44%). Failures in group 3 were less common associated with suture cut-through (33% vs. 50% in group 1 and 2), but no significant differences were found. CONCLUSIONS: All three tested single anchor repair techniques of upper third subscapularis tears were able to provide sufficient biomechanical stability. Knotted lasso-loop mattress and knotless tape repair were superior regarding pressurized footprint coverage compared to a knotted horizontal mattress technique and are, therefore, preferable techniques for upper subscapularis repair.

Biomechanical stability of simple coronal shear fracture fixation of the capitellum.

BACKGROUND: Coronal shear fractures of the capitellum are rare, and their surgical management is challenging, without a defined gold standard. The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical stability of 3 different internal fixation techniques for simple coronal shear fractures of the capitellum without posterior comminution. METHODS: Dubberley type IA fractures of the capitellum were created in 18 cadaveric elbows, which were age and sex matched to the following 3 internal fixation groups: (1) two anteroposterior cannulated headless compression screws (HCSs), (2) two anteroposterior HCSs with an additional anterior antiglide plate (antiGP), and (3) a posterolateral distal humeral locking plate (LP). All fixation techniques were cyclically loaded with 75 N over 2000 cycles and ultimately until construct failure. Data were analyzed for displacement, construct stiffness, and ultimate load to failure. RESULTS: Fragment displacement under cyclic loading with 2000 cycles did not show a significant difference (P = .886) between the 3 groups. The HCS group showed the highest stiffness compared with the HCS-antiGP and LP groups (602 N/mm vs. 540 N/mm vs. 462 N/mm, P = .417), without reaching a statistically significant difference. Ultimate load to failure was also not significantly different on comparison of all 3 groups (P = .297). CONCLUSIONS: Simple coronal shear fractures of the capitellum are biomechanically equally stabilized by HCSs compared with HCSs with an additional antiGP or a posterolateral distal humeral LP. In view of the advantages of less (invasive) metalware, the clinical use of 2 isolated anteroposterior HCSs appears reasonable.