Emergency nursing and medical error--a survey of two states.

INTRODUCTION: This study describes issues concerning emergency nurses in 2 states and their experiences and perspectives regarding the recognition, reporting, and resolution of medical error. METHODS: To illustrate the issues involved in medical error reporting in this clinical specialty, a written survey of emergency nurses was conducted for the purpose of evaluating current practice of reporting medical error in the emergency department. RESULTS: There is little evidence that practical advice and guidance exist for nurses in general and for emergency nurses in particular regarding the issue of medical error recognition, reporting, and resolution. Clinicians are reluctant to report medical error in the structure and framework that is being used currently. DISCUSSION: There is a need for a practiced, standardized approach to medical error reporting that includes improved teamwork, conflict resolution, and appropriate reporting methodology education that should be paired with mandatory reporting laws.

Simulated pediatric trauma team management: assessment of an educational intervention.

OBJECTIVES: Trauma is the leading cause of death in children. The quality of initial medical care received by injured children contributes to outcomes. Our objective was to assess effectiveness of an educational intervention on performance of emergency department (ED) teams during simulated pediatric trauma resuscitations. METHODS: A prospective, preinterventional and postinterventional study was performed on a random, convenience sample of 17% of EDs in North Carolina. An unannounced simulated pediatric trauma resuscitation was conducted at each site, followed by an educational intervention and a second visit 6 months later. The key outcome measure was team performance on a clinical assessment tool previously described that included 44 resuscitation tasks deemed critical to appropriate management of pediatric trauma resuscitation. RESULTS: All 18 sites consented and completed the study. Interrater reliability was excellent, weighted kappa = 0.80 (95% confidence interval, 0.76-0.84). After the educational intervention, the mean (+/- SD) number of the 44 tasks passed by each ED team increased from 17.7 +/- 4.3 to 26.6 +/- 5.8 (P < 0.001). At the individual task level, the scores on 37 (84%) of the 44 tasks improved, of which 11 (25%) of the 44 tasks improved significantly. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that an on-site educational intervention was effective in improving the performance of ED teams during simulated pediatric trauma resuscitations. Postintervention performance was more consistent with the Pediatric Advanced Life Support and Advanced Trauma Life Support guidelines. Further studies are needed to determine if improved performance in a simulated scenario leads to improved performance and better clinical outcomes of critically injured children.

Enhancing pediatric safety: using simulation to assess radiology resident preparedness for anaphylaxis from intravenous contrast media.

PURPOSE: To prospectively develop and test a simulation model for assessing radiology resident preparedness for pediatric life-threatening events in the radiology environment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was institutional review board approved. Nineteen radiology residents (10 men, nine women; mean age, 28.5 years) participated in two simulated contrast material reaction scenarios: one with and one without resuscitation aids available. Each resident examined and managed two mannequins-simulating a 1-2-year-old patient and an 8-9-year-old patient-for type, sequence, dose, and administration route for any intervention, including administering medication, calling a code team, and providing oxygen. The time to order each intervention was documented. Resident responses (time to order intervention, appropriateness of intervention, and intervention route) were evaluated. The paired t test was used to compare the time to intervention between the resuscitation-aid-available and resuscitation-aid-not-available scenarios and between the scenario performed first and the scenario performed second. The McNemar test was performed to compare the percentage of appropriate interventions between the two resuscitation aid scenarios. RESULTS: The average time to call the code team was shorter when no resuscitation aids were available than when resuscitation aids were available (98 vs 149 seconds, P=.08). The average times to request oxygen and epinephrine were shorter when resuscitation aids were available (40 vs 89 seconds to request oxygen, P=.016; 121 vs 163 seconds to request epinephrine, P=.21). Appropriate medication dosing was not significantly different between the two scenarios. In only five of the 38 simulated scenarios was calling the code team the first intervention. The correct sequence of interventions (calling code team, providing oxygen, and then providing epinephrine) was performed by only one resident in one scenario. Only five residents recognized that they were encountering a contrast material reaction. CONCLUSION: Simulation training for radiology residents is valuable and suggests that resident preparedness for pediatric anaphylaxis from intravenous contrast media is insufficient. Clear step-by-step resuscitation aids are needed in the radiology environment.

Simulation of pediatric trauma stabilization in 35 North Carolina emergency departments: identification of targets for performance improvement.

OBJECTIVE: Trauma is the leading cause of death in children. Most children present to community hospital emergency departments (EDs) for initial stabilization. Thus, all EDs must be prepared to care for injured children. The objectives of this study were to (1) characterize the quality of trauma stabilization efforts in EDs and (2) identify targets for educational interventions. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study of simulated trauma stabilizations, that is, "mock codes," at 35 North Carolina EDs. An evaluation tool was created to score each mock code on 44 stabilization tasks. Primary outcomes were (1) interrater reliability of tool, (2) overall performance by each ED, and (3) performance per stabilization task. RESULTS: Evaluation-tool interrater reliability was excellent. The median number of stabilization tasks that needed improvement by the EDs was 25 (57%) of 44 tasks. Although problems were numerous and varied, many EDs need improvement in tasks uniquely important and/or complicated in pediatric resuscitations, including (1) estimating a child's weight (17 of 35 EDs [49%]), (2) preparing for intraosseous needle placement (24 of 35 [69%]), (3) ordering intravenous fluid boluses (31 of 35 [89%]), (4) applying warming measures (34 of 35 [97%]), and (5) ordering dextrose for hypoglycemia (34 of 35 [97%]). CONCLUSIONS: This study used simulation to identify deficiencies in stabilization of children presenting to EDs, revealing that mistakes are ubiquitous. ED personnel were universally receptive to feedback. Future research should investigate whether interventions aimed at improving identified deficiencies can improve trauma stabilization performance and, ultimately, the outcomes of children who present to EDs.

Evaluation of a Web-based education program on reducing medication dosing error: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial.

CONTEXT: The Broselow Pediatric Resuscitation Tape has been shown to be effective in reducing medication dosing error among pediatric emergency providers. However, the tape has often been used inappropriately or incorrectly. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether a Web-based education program on proper use of the tape could reduce medication dosing errors and time to determine dose. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A randomized, controlled trial conducted among 89 pediatric emergency providers from 3 study sites. INTERVENTION: All study subjects participated in a videotaped simulated stabilization scenario and were then randomly assigned to control or education group. After the intervention, all subjects participated in another simulation. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: The primary outcomes included dosing deviation from accepted dose range for each medication prescribed and dosing deviation summary, calculated by averaging dosing deviation for all medications. The secondary outcomes included time to determine a dose for each medication prescribed, and dosing time summary; that is, the average time to determine doses for all medications prescribed. RESULTS: No significant difference was observed in the demographic characteristics of the 2 groups. After the educational intervention, the average (12.6% vs. 24.9%) and median (7.1% vs. 20.1%) dosing deviation summary were much lower in the education group than in the control group. The difference in the median dosing deviation summary between the 2 groups was statistically significant (P = 0.0002). Similar results were observed for the dosing time. The education group demonstrated a lower average (16 vs. 20 seconds) and lower median (15 vs. 18 seconds) dosing time summary than the control group. The difference in the median dosing time summary between the 2 groups was statistically significant (P = 0.02). Analysis of each medication prescribed indicated that the decrease in the dosing deviation and dosing time in the education group was most obvious for several specific medications. CONCLUSIONS: The Web-based education program on the proper use of the Broselow Pediatric Resuscitation Tape could improve dosing accuracy and reduce dosing time.