ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This report summarizes the findings of the consensus panel based on the results of the comprehensive questionnaire of US American College of Phlebology annual congress attendees and results of the systematic meta-analysis of the literature and provides quality improvement guidelines for the use of endovenous foam sclerotherapy (EFS) for the treatment of venous disorders, as well as identifies areas of needed research. METHODS: Based on the above data, quality improvement guidelines were developed and reviewed by the ten US consensus panel members and approved by their respective societies. RESULTS: EFS is effective for the treatment of truncal and tributary varicose veins, both as primary treatment and for treatment of recurrence. It may improve the signs and symptoms associated with varicose veins including pain and swelling. EFS is contraindicated in patients who have experienced an allergic reaction to previous treatment with foam or liquid sclerosant, and in patients with acute venous thrombosis events secondary to EFS. CONCLUSION: These guidelines for the use of EFS in the treatment of venous disorders provide an initial framework for the safe and efficacious use of this therapy, and the impetus to promote the evaluation of the questions remaining regarding the use of EFS through well-designed randomized and cohort studies.
Subject(s)
Quality Improvement , Sclerotherapy/methods , Varicose Veins/therapy , Vascular Diseases/therapy , Humans , Phlebotomy/methods , Phlebotomy/standards , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Recurrence , Sclerosing Solutions/chemistry , Sclerosing Solutions/therapeutic use , Societies, Medical , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome , United States , Venous Thrombosis/prevention & controlABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To assess practice patterns of endovenous foam sclerotherapy (EFS) use in the USA. METHODS: A multidisciplinary panel of US experts was convened and developed a questionnaire to assess use of EFS. US attendees at the American College of Phlebology 2009 Annual Congress were asked to complete the questionnaire. RESULTS: Of 776 questionnaires distributed, 239 were completed (31%). The majority of respondents (87%) reported using EFS for the treatment of venous disorders. Foam sclerotherapy was used by a wide variety of specialists in every region of the USA. The most common indication was sclerosis of recurrent truncal or tributary veins of the leg. There was variation among practitioners in the indications for use, pre- and postprocedural evaluation and procedure methodology. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this questionnaire show widespread usage of EFS and are important in the development of national quality improvement guidelines for the performance of EFS.
Subject(s)
Endovascular Procedures/methods , Sclerotherapy/methods , Surveys and Questionnaires , Varicose Veins/therapy , Congresses as Topic , Female , Humans , Leg/blood supply , Male , United States , Varicose Veins/epidemiologyABSTRACT
Analogs of the immunosuppressive cyclic undecapeptide cyclosporin A (CsA) with substitutions in positions 1, 4, 6, and/or 11 were rationally designed to possess substantially diminished or no immunosuppressive activity. When these compounds were assayed for their capacity to interfere with the replication of human immunodeficiency virus, some displayed a potent antiviral activity in newly infected cells. However, only CsA could interfere with virus replication in persistently infected cells. One CsA analog with antiviral activity costimulated the phytohemagglutinin-induced production of interleukin 2 by human lymphocytes. Human immunodeficiency virus particles from drug-exposed cells showed lower infectivity than virions from untreated cells. Thus, these nonimmunosuppressive analogs of CsA constitute a promising class of lead compounds to develop drugs for effective treatment of the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome.
