Long-term follow-up of patients with GIST undergoing metastasectomy in the era of imatinib -- analysis of prognostic factors (EORTC-STBSG collaborative study).

BACKGROUND: Long-term complete remissions remain a rare exception in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) treated with IM (imatinib). To date the therapeutic relevance of surgical resection of metastatic disease remains unknown except for the use in palliative intent. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in consecutive patients with metastatic GIST who underwent metastasectomy and received IM therapy (n = 239). RESULTS: Complete resection (R0+R1) was achieved in 177 patients. Median OS was 8.7 y for R0/R1 and 5.3 y in pts with R2 resection (p = 0.0001). In the group who were in remission at time of resection median OS was not reached in the R0/R1 surgery and 5.1 y in the R2-surgery (p = 0.0001). Median time to relapse/progression after resection of residual disease was not reached in the R0/R1 and 1.9 years in the R2 group of patients, who were resected in response. No difference in mPFS was seen in patients progressing at time of surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis implicates possible long-term survival in patients in whom surgical complete remission can be achieved. Incomplete resection, including debulking surgery does not seem to prolong survival. Despite the retrospective character and likely selection bias, this analysis may help in decision making for surgical approaches in metastatic GIST.

Phase I study of panobinostat and imatinib in patients with treatment-refractory metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

BACKGROUND: Panobinostat, a pan-deacetylase inhibitor, overcomes imatinib resistance in preclinical models of gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST). Here we determined the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) of panobinostat in combination with imatinib (IM) for treatment of patients with refractory GIST. METHODS: Following a 7-day run-in phase of IM (400 mg per day), escalating doses of panobinostat were added following a '3 plus 3' design. Twelve heavily pretreated GIST patients were enrolled in two dose levels. RESULTS: Most common adverse events were thrombocytopenia, anaemia, fatigue, creatinine elevation, nausea, emesis and diarrhoea. Twenty micrograms of panobinostat and 400 mg IM were declared the MTD. Pharmacologically active concentrations of panobinostat and IM were achieved as evidenced by histone H3 acetylation in blood mononuclear cells in vivo and inhibition of the IM-resistant KIT (D816) mutation in vitro. In FDG-PET-CT scans after IM run-in and following 3 weeks panobinostat treatment, 1 out of 11 evaluable patients showed a metabolic partial response, 7 patients were metabolically stable and 3 patients progressed. Longest treatment duration was 17 weeks (median 6). CONCLUSION: Panobinostat and IM can be administered at doses achieving target inhibition in vivo. Further clinical exploration of patients with treatment-refractory GIST is warranted. Correlative studies in this trial may help to optimise dosing schedules in GIST.

Neoadjuvant treatment improves capsular integrity and the width of the fibrous capsule of high-grade soft-tissue sarcomas.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant treatment is thought to improve resection with margin-negative surgery in locally advanced soft-tissue sarcomas (STS). Treatment-induced alterations of the tumor peripheryhave not yet been microscopically evaluated. OBJECTIVE: This histopathological study compared limb STS with primary resection and those that had undergone neoadjuvant treatment, emphasizing microscopic changes of the fibrous capsule (FC) and reactive zone (RZ) after neoadjuvant treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with primary high-grade limb sarcomas (N = 76) which have not previously been treated were included. Of those, 37 were primarily resected and 39 were treated with one of the following neoadjuvant treatment modalities: 7x chemotherapy (CTX), 3x radiotherapy (RT), 15x isolated limb perfusion (ILP), 8x CTX + RT, and 6x CTX + ILP. Sizes of the FC and RZ were microscopically measured, and FC-integrity was documented. Histopathologic regression was expressed as a percent. RESULTS: Only 35.1% of untreated sarcomas showed an intact FC. We observed significantly higher capsular integrity after treatment (76.9%). Additionally, the average width of the FC (0.21 mm vs. 0.61 mm) and RZ (0.67 mm vs. 1.48 mm) increased significantly. The extent of histopathologic regression showed a correlation with capsular integrity and width. The combination of two treatment modalities (CTX + RT or ILP) showed strongest effects at the tumor periphery. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant treatment stabilizes the tumor periphery in STS (e.g., the capsule). Concerning local treatment strategies, these novel histopathologic insights might significantly influence the decision as to whether primary resection is advisable in advanced local soft-tissue sarcoma.

Thalidomide in combination with vincristine, epirubicin and dexamethasone (VED) for previously untreated patients with multiple myeloma.

The present study aimed to evaluate the side-effects and efficacy of thalidomide in combination with an anthracycline-containing chemotherapy regimen in previously untreated myeloma patients. Thalidomide (400 mg/d) was combined with bolus injections of vincristine and epirubicin and oral dexamethasone (VED). Chemotherapy cycles were repeated every 3 wk until no further reduction in myeloma protein was observed, whereas the treatment with thalidomide was continued until disease progression. Thirty-one patients were enrolled, 12 patients were exclusively treated with thalidomide in combination with VED and 19 patients additionally received high-dose melphalan, for consolidation. Adverse events and response to therapy were assessed prior to treatment with high-dose chemotherapy. Response to thalidomide combined with VED was complete remission in six patients (19%), partial remission in 19 patients (61%), stable disease in five patients (16%), and progressive disease in one patient (3.2%). Grade 3 and 4 adverse events consisted of leukocytopenia in 10 patients (32%), and thrombocytopenia and anemia in one patient each (3.2%). Neutropenic infections grade 3 and 4 occurred in seven (23%) and three patients (9.7%), respectively, including two patients (6.5%) who died from septic shock. Deep vein thrombosis occurred in eight patients (26%), constipation in 20 patients (65%), and polyneuropathy in 20 patients (65%). The probability of event-free survival and overall survival in the whole group of patients at 36 months were 26 and 62%, respectively. In conclusion, the combination of thalidomide with VED appears to be highly effective in previously untreated patients with multiple myeloma, but it is associated with a high rate of thrombotic events, polyneuropathy, and neutropenic infections.