Understanding Perceived Barriers to Colposcopy Follow-Up Among Underserved Women at an Urban Teaching Hospital: A Qualitative Study.

OBJECTIVE: Loss to follow-up after abnormal cervical cancer screening disproportionately impacts underserved populations. Our objective was to identify perceived barriers to follow-up after abnormal Pap smear among underserved women. METHODS: Women with abnormal Pap smear presenting for colposcopy at an urban teaching hospital were asked to participate in qualitative interviews. A topic guide was developed to assess knowledge about cervical cancer screening and perceived barriers to follow-up. A demographic survey was completed and interviews were recorded and transcribed. Responses were coded and placed into a framework: intrapersonal, interpersonal, and community barriers. Major themes and subthemes were identified. Demographic data were reported descriptively. RESULTS: Of 24 women enrolled, 18 (75%) completed full interviews. Median age was 38 years (range = 21-64). Participants were racially diverse: 10 (56%) Hispanic, 7 (39%) non-Hispanic White, 1 (5.5%) non-Hispanic Black, and 1 (5.5%) Asian, and all had public insurance. Seven (39%) presented for their 1st colposcopy visit and 11 (61%) had previous visits. Seventeen (94%) had a positive human papillomavirus test and 7 (39%) had atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. The most common themes identified were related to knowledge gaps, including lack of understanding of Pap smears/human papillomavirus and cervical cancer risk factors. Most participants were satisfied with provider communication but dissatisfied with communication with the office, like scheduling appointments. CONCLUSIONS: Despite positive patient perception of physician communication, knowledge was most commonly identified as a barrier to colposcopy follow-up. Implementing a web-based intervention addressing knowledge gaps may improve abnormal cervical cancer screening follow-up among this population.

Surveillance Only for High-risk FIGO Stage IA/IB Malignant Ovarian Germ Cell Tumors: Results From a National Cancer Database.

OBJECTIVES: Investigate the use and outcomes of a surveillance only strategy for patients with high-risk stage I malignant ovarian germ cell tumors. METHODS: Patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IA/IB grade 2 or 3 immature teratoma, yolk sac, or mixed germ cell tumor diagnosed between 2004 and 2014 who had at least 1 month of follow-up were drawn from the National Cancer Database. Overall survival (OS) was evaluated for each histologic subtype using Kaplan-Meier curves, and compared with the log-rank test. RESULTS: A total of 497 patients were identified; 115 (23.1%) with grade 2 immature teratoma, 157 (31.6%) with grade 3 immature teratoma, 101 (20.3%) with yolk sac tumor, 124 (25%) with mixed germ cell tumor. Rate of adjuvant chemotherapy was 68.2% (655 patients), while rate of lymph node biopsy/dissection was 55.2%. A total of 19 (3.8%) deaths were observed at a median of 29.8 months. There was no difference in OS between patients who did and did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy with grade 2 (P=0.35) and grade 3 immature teratoma (P=0.47) or mixed germ cell tumors (P=0.55). Patients with yolk sac tumors those who received chemotherapy had better OS compared with those who did not, P=0.019; 5-year OS rates were 92.7% and 79.6%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A surveillance only strategy for patients with stage I malignant ovarian germ cell tumors is associated with excellent survival outcomes for patients with grade 2 or 3 immature teratoma or mixed germ cell tumors.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Genetic Testing at a Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Center.

BACKGROUND: Prior studies suggest that referral to genetic counseling and completion of genetic testing vary by race/ethnicity; however, the data are limited. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate patterns of genetic testing and clinical outcomes across race/ethnicity at a hereditary breast and ovarian cancer center. DESIGN: The medical records for all patients undergoing genetic assessment at a hereditary breast and ovarian cancer center were reviewed and stratified by self-reported race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic White, Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, and Asian). PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1666 patients met inclusion criteria (non-Hispanic Whites, 1367; Hispanics, 85, non-Hispanic Blacks, 101; Asians, 113). MAIN MEASURES: Demographics, patient characteristics, and referral patterns for patients who underwent genetic testing were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis tests, chi-square test, or Fisher's exact tests, stratifying by self-reported race/ethnicity. Pathogenic mutations and variants of unknown significance (VUS) were reviewed. Outcomes of patients with genetic mutations and personal history of breast and/or gynecologic malignancies were compared. KEY RESULTS: Non-Hispanic Whites were more likely to be referred due to family cancer history compared to all other ethnicities while Non-Hispanic Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians were more likely to be referred due to personal history of cancer (p < 0.001). Non-Hispanic Blacks and Hispanics were more likely to have advanced-stage cancer at the time of genetic testing (p < 0.02). Rates of mutations did not differ by race/ethnicity when Ashkenazi Jewish patients were excluded (p = 0.08). Among patients found to have a BRCA1/2 mutation, Non-Hispanic Whites were more likely to undergo cancer screening and risk-reducing surgery compared with all other ethnicities (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Minority patients were more likely to utilize genetic services following a cancer diagnosis and less likely due to family cancer history, suggesting a missed opportunity for mutation detection and cancer prevention in this population. Efforts to eradicate racial/ethnic disparities in early access to genetic testing and guided cancer prevention strategies are essential.

Disparities in the Use of Adjuvant External Beam Radiation Therapy in Node-positive Cervical Cancer Patients Following Hysterectomy.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the use of adjuvant external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) among patients with early-stage cervical carcinoma metastatic to regional lymph nodes (LNs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The National Cancer Database was accessed and patients with early-stage cervical carcinoma diagnosed between 2004 and 2015 were identified. Those with regional LN metastases who had a hysterectomy were selected and administration of adjuvant EBRT was evaluated. Travel distance from the reporting facility was categorized into short (<12.5 miles), intermediate (12.5 to 49.9 miles) and long (>49.9 miles). RESULTS: A total of 3436 patients met the inclusion criteria; the rate of EBRT use was 69.7%. Black women were less likely to receive EBRT compared with white (64.2% vs. 70.6%, P=0.037), while patients who had radical hysterectomy were more likely to receive EBRT compared with those who had simple hysterectomy (72.6% vs. 66%, P<0.001). Rates of EBRT administration for patients who traveled short distance was 74.3% compared with 68.9% and 56.9% for those who traveled intermediate and long distance, respectively (P<0.001). On multivariate analysis, patients who traveled long (odds ratio: 0.44, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.36, 0.54) or intermediate (OR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.61, 0.86) distances were less likely to receive EBRT. After controlling for age, race, insurance, presence of comorbidities, stage, histology, and type of hysterectomy, omission of EBRT was associated with worse survival (hazard ratio: 1.53, 95% CI: 1.32, 1.78). CONCLUSIONS: A large percentage of patients with early-stage cervical cancer and positive LNs did not receive EBRT following hysterectomy. Black women were less likely to receive EBRT than white women. Travel burden may negatively influence appropriate treatment.

Feasibility and Learning Curve of Robotic Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery in Gynecology.

Single-site laparoscopy has proven to be a desirable option for patients undergoing gynecologic surgery, with some studies indicating improved cosmesis and less perioperative pain compared with standard approaches. This study describes the safety and feasibility of a novel robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (R-LESS) platform as it is incorporated into a surgeon's practice with extensive multiport robotic surgical experience but limited LESS experience. We reviewed 83 women undergoing R-LESS by a single surgeon from September 2013 through August 2015. Operative times (total operative time, console time, docking time) were collected prospectively for the first 53 cases, and total operative time was collected retrospectively for the next 30 cases. Clinical parameters, including age, estimated blood loss, body mass index (BMI), prior abdominal surgeries, conversion to laparotomy, procedure type, uterine weight, length of hospital stay, and complications, were retrospectively collected from medical charts. Eighty-two of 83 surgeries were completed successfully with a single incision. One surgery was converted to multiport robotics for para-aortic lymph node dissection. Twelve surgeries were performed for cancer (ovary 1, uterus 8, and cervix 3). Eight patients underwent pelvic lymph node biopsy. The median total operative time for hysterectomies was 128 minutes (range, 60-275). After the first 13 hysterectomies the total operative time and the console time decreased significantly from 165.3 to 131.1 minutes (p = .032) and from 84.9 to 57.1 minutes (p = .028), respectively. Mean docking time halved from 7.8 minutes to 3.4 minutes comparing the first 10 cases to the last 10 cases. Surgical times were longer with larger BMIs, but the console time decreased with experience regardless of BMI. The mean uterine weight was 164 g (range, 30-460). Complications included 2 umbilical hernias (2.4%) and 1 conversion to multiport. In conclusion, R-LESS is a feasible and safe surgical platform for gynecologic procedures. A small number of cases are needed to significantly improve operative times when it is introduced on a surgeon's practice with limited experience in LESS but familiar with robotic surgery. Further study is needed to investigate the cost, benefits, and long-term outcomes of R-LESS.

Molecular alterations of PIK3CA in uterine carcinosarcoma, clear cell, and serous tumors.

OBJECTIVES: Type II endometrial carcinomas-uterine carcinosarcomas or uterine malignant mesodermal mixed tumors (UMMMTs), clear cell carcinomas (UCCs), and uterine serous carcinomas (USCs)-are aggressive malignancies that present with advanced disease and have high mortality rates. PIK3CA mutations are commonly found in endometrial cancers. The objective of the study was to characterize molecular alterations in the PIK3CA gene in these tumors. METHODS: A total of 84 cases (20 UMMMTs, 18 UCCs, and 46 USCs) were selected from the surgical pathology files of Weill Cornell Medical College and Johns Hopkins Hospital. The diagnoses were confirmed by gynecologic pathologists (L.H.E. and A.Y.). DNA was extracted from paraffin-embedded tissue. Polymerase chain reaction was performed for mutational analysis. All the studies were performed in accordance with approved Institutional Review Board protocols. RESULTS: Mutations in the PIK3CA gene were identified in 3 (15%) of 20 UMMMT, 3 (16.7%) of 18 UCC, and 10 (21.7%) of 46 USC cases. We report novel mutations in PIK3CA in uterine carcinosarcoma. CONCLUSIONS: A significant percentage of UMMMTs, UCCs, and USCs have mutations in PIK3CA. Further investigation is needed to develop targeted therapies for these aggressive uterine cancers.

Minimally invasive staging of endometrial cancer is feasible and safe in elderly women.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the surgical outcome of elderly and younger patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic surgical staging of endometrial cancer. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). SETTING: University-affiliated hospital. PATIENTS: One hundred twenty-nine patients comprised the study group. Sixty patients were aged 65 years or older (elderly group), and 69 patients were younger than 65 years (younger group). INTERVENTION: Abdominal, laparoscopic, or robotic hysterectomy. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Among the 109 patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic staging, there were no differences in estimated blood loss, lymph node count, surgical time, complications, rate of blood transfusion, conversion to laparotomy, and mean postoperative stay between elderly and younger patients. CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive surgical staging for endometrial cancer is both feasible and safe in the elderly population and offers similar outcomes as in younger patients.