Developing the embedded researcher role: Learning from the first year of the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR), Health Determinants Research Collaboration (HDRC), Doncaster, UK.

Background: Strategies to embed research knowledge into decision making contexts include the Embedded Research (ER) model, which involves the collocation of academic researchers in non-academic organisations such as hospitals and local authorities. A local authority in Doncaster, United Kingdom (UK) has adopted an embedded researcher model within the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR), Health Determinants Research Collaboration (HDRC). This five-year collaboration enables universities and local authorities to work together to reduce health inequalities and target the social determinants of health. Building on previous embedded research models, this approach is unique due to its significant scale and long-term investment. In this opinion paper Embedded Researchers (ERs) reflect on their experiences of the first year of the collaboration. Study design: A reflective consultation exercise. Methods: Observation of HDRC delivery meetings, as well as informal discussions and a short proforma with ERs (N = 8). Results: ERs valued the five-year timeframe which provided a unique opportunity for strengthened relationships and to apply formative learning as the programme progressed. However, differences in knowledge of undertaking research across the HDRC team and between practitioners and academics require each to respect different professional experiences and to avoid potential power imbalances. Diverse projects required researchers to be generalists, applying their expertise to multiple topics. This requires careful priority setting alongside workload and expectation management. Conclusions: The significant scale and investment of the HDRC provides a unique opportunity for developing the ER role by applying formative learning as the programme progresses. However, success will require careful management of workload allocation and relationships between ERs and practitioners. Further learning on how to embed ERs within local authority contexts will emerge as the programme matures.

Learning from the challenges of undertaking an evaluation of a multi-partner housing support initiative delivered within a hospital setting.

Objectives: We present learning from a mixed-methods evaluation of a housing support initiative for hospital inpatients. Study design: A mixed-methods process evaluation. Methods: A social housing provider delivered a housing support service in two hospitals (mental health unit and general hospital). Healthcare providers, the social housing provider and academic researchers designed and undertook a co-produced, mixed-methods process evaluation of the intervention. The evaluation included questionnaires, semi-structured interviews, analysis of routinely collected data and economic analysis. Despite commitment from the partners, the evaluation faced challenges. We reflect on the lessons learnt within our discussion paper. Results: Despite the commitment of the partners, we faced several challenges.We took an iterative approach to the design and processes of the evaluation to respond to arising challenges. Recruitment of service-users was more difficult than anticipated, requiring additional staff resources. Given the small-scale nature of the intervention, and the quality of data recorded in hospital records, the planned economic analysis was not feasible. Positive factors facilitating evaluation included involvement of staff delivering the intervention, as well as managers. Being able to offer payment to partner organisations for staff time also facilitated ongoing engagement. Conclusions: Multi-partner evaluations are useful, however, researchers and partners need to be prepared to take an iterative, resource intensive approach. Both availability and quality of routine data, and the resources required to support data collection, may limit feasibility of specific methods when evaluating small-scale cross-sector initiatives. Thus, this necessitates a flexible approach to design and analysis.

Canine coronavirus subtype 2a associated with outbreaks of fatal diarrhoea in bush dog (Speothos venaticus) groups.

INTRODUCTION: Three outbreaks of fatal diarrhoea occurred in bush dog (Speothos venaticus) groups at two zoological collections in the United Kingdom between 2009 and 2017. In all cases, the predominant clinical signs were diarrhoea, anorexia and severe loss of condition. Despite supportive treatment, a number of fatalities occurred during each outbreak. Common gross post mortem findings were emaciation, with erythema, mucosal haemorrhage, and ulceration of the gastrointestinal tract. Histopathological features included villus blunting and fusion, crypt epithelial loss and lymphoid depletion, supporting a viral aetiology and canine coronavirus was suspected. Diagnosis was confirmed on the basis of serology (rising antibody titres) and the detection of viral nucleic acid using polymerase chain reaction. The canine coronavirus was subtyped as type 2a, which is known to cause systemic fatal disease in immature domestic dogs. To the authors' knowledge, these are the first reported cases of fatal diarrhoea associated with canine coronavirus type 2a in bush dogs. These outbreaks suggest that adult bush dogs are highly susceptible to canine coronavirus infection and may succumb to viral enteritis.

INTRODUCTION: Trois foyers de diarrhée mortelle sont survenus dans des groupes de chiens de brousse (Speothos venaticus) dans deux parcs zoologiques au Royaume-Uni entre 2009 et 2017. Dans tous les cas, les signes cliniques prédominants étaient la diarrhée, l'anorexie et une grave perte de condition. Malgré un traitement de soutien, un certain nombre de décès sont survenus au cours de chaque épidémie. Les résultats macroscopiques courants post-mortem étaient l'émaciation, un érythème, des hémorragies des muqueuses et des ulcération du tractus gastro-intestinal. Les caractéristiques histopathologiques comprenaient un émoussement et une fusion des villosités, une perte épithéliale des cryptes et une déplétion lymphoïde, ce qui confortait une étiologie virale. Un coronavirus canin a été suspecté. Le diagnostic a été confirmé sur la base de la sérologie (augmentation des titres d'anticorps) et de la détection d'acide nucléique viral par amplification en chaîne par polymérase. Le coronavirus canin a été sous-typé comme type 2a, qui est connu pour provoquer une maladie systémique mortelle chez les chiens domestiques immatures. À la connaissance des auteurs, il s'agit des premiers cas signalés de diarrhée mortelle associée au coronavirus canin de type 2a chez les chiens des buissons. Ces épidémies suggèrent que les chiens des buissons adultes sont très sensibles à l'infection par le coronavirus canin et peuvent succomber à une entérite virale.

A qualitative study of the impact of the UK 'bedroom tax'.

BACKGROUND: The implementation of the 'Removal of the Spare Room Subsidy' in April 2013, commonly known as the 'bedroom tax', affects an estimated 660 000 working age social housing tenants in the UK, reducing weekly incomes by £12-£22. This study aimed to examine the impact of this tax on health and wellbeing in a North East England community in which 68.5% of residents live in social housing. METHODS: Qualitative study using interviews and a focus group with 38 social housing tenants and 12 service providers. RESULTS: Income reduction affected purchasing power for essentials, particularly food and utilities. Participants recounted negative impacts on mental health, family relationships and community networks. The hardship and debt that people experienced adversely affected their social relationships and ability to carry out normal social roles. Residents and service providers highlighted negative impacts on the neighbourhood, as well as added pressure on already strained local services. CONCLUSIONS: The bedroom tax has increased poverty and had broad-ranging adverse effects on health, wellbeing and social relationships within this community. These findings strengthen the arguments for revoking this tax.