A practical approach to incidental findings in neuroimaging research.

OBJECTIVE: We describe the systematic approach to incidental findings (IFs) used at the Mind Research Network (MRN) where all MRI scans receive neuroradiologist interpretation and participants are provided results. METHODS: From 2004 to 2011, 8,545 MRI scans were acquired by 45 researchers. As mandated by MRN's external institutional review board, all structural sequences were evaluated by a clinical neuroradiologist who generated a report that included recommendations for referral if indicated. Investigators received a copy of their participants' reports, which were also mailed to participants unless they specifically declined. To better understand the impact of the radiology review process, a financial analysis was completed in addition to a follow-up phone survey to characterize participant perceptions regarding receiving their MRI scan results. RESULTS: The radiologist identified IFs in 34% of the 4,447 participants. Of those with IFs (n = 1,518), the radiologist recommended urgent or immediate referral for 2.5% and routine referral for 17%. For 80.5%, no referral was recommended. Estimated annual cost for this approach including support for the neuroradiologist, medical director, and ancillary staff is approximately $60,000 or $24/scan. The results of the retrospective phone survey showed that 92% of participants appreciated receiving their MRI report, and the majority stated it increased their likelihood of volunteering for future studies. CONCLUSIONS: Addressing IFs in a cost-effective and consistent manner is possible by adopting a policy that provides neuroradiology interpretation and offers participant assistance with clinical follow-up when necessary. Our experience suggests that an ethical, institution-wide approach to IFs can be implemented with minimal investigator burden.

Efficacy of colony-stimulating factors in acute leukemia.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the literature describing the safety and efficacy of the hematopoietic colony-stimulating factors (CSFs) for the management of treatment-related adverse effects in patients with acute leukemia. DATA SOURCES: A systematic MEDLINE search of the English-language literature (1995-April 2000) was performed to identify all randomized trials evaluating CSF use in acute leukemia. The following search terms were used: granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, filgrastim, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, sargramostim, acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), acute nonlymphocytic leukemia, and acute myeloid leukemia. The references from relevant literature were also examined in order to identify reports not discovered in the MEDLINE search. DATA SYNTHESIS: Six randomized trials in pediatric ALL, nine in adult AML, and four in adult ALL have examined the safety and efficacy of the CSFs. Two of the pediatric trials supported a reduction in either the duration of hospitalization or in the incidence of febrile neutropenia when a CSF was employed during the consolidation or intensification phase of chemotherapy. The remaining pediatric trials failed to demonstrate a clinical benefit. In adult AML, eight of the nine trials showed a significant decrease in the time to neutrophil recovery when a CSF was used. Only one of these trials demonstrated a decrease in hospital stay and none showed a decreased incidence of infection for patients who received a CSF. Three of the four trials in adult ALL demonstrated the efficacy of a CSF in decreasing the number of days to neutrophil recovery. Only one trial demonstrated that a CSF led to a reduction in the number of hospital days. Trials in children or adults have not demonstrated that the CSFs influence the long-term outcome of patients with acute leukemia. CONCLUSIONS: The published studies document a decrease in the time to recovery from neutropenia when patients with acute leukemia are treated with a CSF. However, a consistent reduction in infectious complications or in the duration of hospitalization has not been demonstrated when a CSF is used for either pediatric or adult patients. Very limited data exist to support the premise that CSFs meet the criteria established by the American Society of Clinical Oncology for demonstrating the value of these agents. Further careful study focused on resource utilization and pharmacoeconomics may help to elucidate how healthcare institutions may most effectively employ CSFs to treat patients with acute leukemia.

Computerized system for outcomes-based antiemetic therapy in children.

OBJECTIVE: To introduce a computerized data collection system used for an outcomes-based approach to antiemetic therapy in children, and to present data collected with this system in support of a new antiemetic dosing regimen. METHODS: A validated nausea/vomiting survey was used to collect data on nausea severity (NSEV), vomiting severity (VSEV), daily activity interference (DAI), and the number of vomiting episodes. NSEV, VSEV, and DAI were rated as 0 = none to 3 = severe. All children and/or their parents were surveyed following the completion of each highly emetogenic chemotherapy regimen. This survey was computerized and transferred to a handheld data entry unit. Time and motion studies were performed to compare the time required to collect nausea/vomiting data and transfer the data to a computerized database with the hand-held system versus traditional paper (manual) surveys. The hand-held technology was used to collect survey data for children receiving a new antiemetic regimen (daily ondansetron and dexamethasone [OD]), which was then compared with data obtained with a previously employed regimen (thrice-daily ondansetron and daily methylprednisolone [OM]). Statistical analysis and a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) were performed to compare the two antiemetic regimens. RESULTS: The mean time required for total data entry with the manual system was 5.2 minutes per survey versus 2.4 minutes with the hand-held technology (p = 0.0026). A total of 376 nausea/vomiting surveys in 78 children receiving the OM antiemetic regimen were compared with 153 surveys in 38 children treated with the OD regimen. The mean survey scores were as follows: NSEV (1.2 vs. 0.8), VSEV (1.0 vs. 0.7), DAI (1.0 vs. 0.7), and number of vomiting episodes (4.3 vs. 2.1) for OM and OD, respectively; all were significantly lower with the OD regimen (p < 0.05). The percentage of patients with complete control of nausea and vomiting (19.2% vs. 39.2%) and good control (55.6% vs. 65.4%) were significantly greater with the OD regimen (p < 0.05). The CEA revealed that the OD resulted in a reduction of approximately $31 per patient for good protection and a $258 reduction for complete protection from nausea and vomiting. CONCLUSIONS: A computerized outcomes-based system aided by handheld technology allowed for more prompt and efficient collection of nausea/vomiting data. The OD antiemetic regimen was shown to be a more cost-effective alternative for children receiving severely emetogenic chemotherapy.

Survey ranking of emetogenic control in children receiving chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of standard antiemetic treatment in children receiving various combination chemotherapy regimens. METHODS: A validated nausea/vomiting survey was administered to 78 patients receiving 13 different emetogenic chemotherapy regimens. Patients received antiemetic prophylaxis with ondansetron (0.3 mg/kg/day) alone for moderately emetogenic chemotherapy regimens or ondansetron (0.45 mg/kg/day) and methylprednisolone (4 mg/kg/day) for severely emetogenic chemotherapy regimens. A total of 324 different courses of chemotherapy were surveyed. Nausea and vomiting severity, duration, number of emetic episodes, appetite, daily activity interference, and rates of both complete and good antiemetic protection were determined for each chemotherapy protocol. Differences between genders and ages were analyzed. RESULTS: Chemotherapy combinations containing platinum compounds were found to be highly emetogenic and nauseating despite antiemetic therapy with ondansetron plus a corticosteroid. In addition, complete antiemetic protection for the combination of vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and dactinomycin was poor. For most of the severely emetogenic chemotherapy protocols, patients experienced good protection from nausea and vomiting less than 60% of the time, despite the use of ondansetron plus methylprednisolone. Significant differences were found in rates of residual nausea and vomiting and failure of antiemetic protection among the severely emetogenic chemotherapy protocols despite identical antiemetic therapy. Good protection rates were higher for moderately emetogenic chemotherapy treated with ondansetron alone. CONCLUSIONS: The currently recommended prophylactic therapy for pediatric patients receiving severely emetogenic chemotherapy fails to provide protection for many patients receiving commonly administered chemotherapy regimens and for most pediatric patients receiving platinum-containing chemotherapy combinations. New and refined antiemetic strategies are needed to improve efficacy in the pediatric population.

Assessment of the emetogenic potential of intrathecal chemotherapy and response to prophylactic treatment with ondansetron.

The purpose of this study was to document the emetogenic potential of intrathecal chemotherapy (IC) in children and to evaluate the efficacy of ondansetron in reducing nausea and vomiting with this chemotherapy treatment. Patients less than 18 years of age with acute lymphoblastic leukemia were eligible to participate in a survey project measuring the emetogenic potential of various chemotherapy treatments. Patients surveyed for 1 or more IC treatments were included in this report. The IC consisted of methotrexate, hydrocortisone and cytarabine, dosed according to patient age. A nausea/vomiting survey instrument was completed by each patient and/or parent following IC treatment. The instrument rated nausea, vomiting and daily activity interference (DAI) on a 4-point scale of 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate and 3 = severe, and collected data on the number of vomiting and/or retching episodes in addition to the child's appetite following the chemotherapy treatment. When ondansetron was employed, it was administered in an i.v. infusion at a dose of 0.15 mg/kg before and after chemotherapy or as an oral dose of 4 mg or 8 mg before chemotherapy. Courses of IC without antiemetics were analyzed to determine the emetogenic potential of IC. For patients receiving IC both with and without ondansetron, courses were compared with each patient used as their own control to determine the influence of ondansetron upon survey responses. Statistical analysis consisted of nonparametric Friedman 2-way ANOVA for ordinal variables and a paired t-test for continuous variables. The binomial test was employed to analyze for differences between ondansetron and no antiemetic in the number of patients with complete control of both nausea and vomiting or vomiting alone. A total of 63 children with a mean age of 7.6 +/- 4.2 years were each studied on one or more occasions. Thirty-seven children were surveyed for 87 IC treatments without antiemetics (group I), and 17 children from this group were surveyed for 48 IC courses with i.v. ondansetron (group IA). An additional 18 children were subsequently surveyed for 39 IC courses with i.v. ondansetron (group II). Fifteen patients (7 of whom were members of group I) were surveyed following 33 IC courses with oral ondansetron (group III). The survey scores for group I patients were: nausea severity 1.3 +/- 1.1, vomiting severity 1.2 +/- 1.1, DAI 1.2 +/- 1.0 and mean number of emetic episodes 4.7 +/- 8.4. The mean appetite score was 1.5 +/- 1.1. For patients in group IA, nausea severity (0.8 +/- 0.9), vomiting severity (0.5 +/- 0.8), DAI (0.7 +/- 0.8), and the number of emetic episodes (1.4 +/- 2.8) were all significantly lower than with prior IC treatments without ondansetron. For complete protection, children receiving i.v. ondansetron had greater complete protection rates from both nausea and vomiting or vomiting alone than did patients receiving no antiemetic. Survey responses were also lower for patients receiving oral ondansetron, but insufficient control data did not allow for statistical analysis. IC results in mild to moderate nausea and vomiting in children. The emetogenic potential of IC is significantly reduced by i.v. ondansetron.

Differences among raters evaluating the success of EMLA cream in alleviating procedure-related pain in children with cancer.

We evaluated the analgesic efficacy of EMLA cream after repeated bone marrow aspirations or lumbar punctures (LPs) in children with cancer, and compared the ratings among patients, their parents, physicians, and nurses. Data from LPs were analyzed at the last procedure without EMLA (T1) and the first and last procedures with EMLA (T2 and T3). Friedman's nonparametric analysis of variance was used for statistical analysis. A total of 272 procedures in 29 children were analyzed. For 179 procedures without EMLA, physicians rated pain lower than other raters, and for the 93 with EMLA physicians rated pain less than the children. Children rated pain at T2 lower than at T1 or T3. Physicians rated pain at T2 less than at T3. Both children and physicians rated pain at T3 as not different from that at T1. No differences were noted at these time points for other raters in LP distress ratings, or in bone marrow aspiration pain or distress ratings. Thus EMLA was associated with decreased pain ratings for LPs, but this effect was not sustainable with repeated procedures. The cream alone should not be relied on to control pain of bone marrow aspiration or repeated LPs in children. Physicians underestimated pain, which may have implications for undertreatment in this patient population.

Economic impact with home delivery of chemotherapy to pediatric oncology patients.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the economic impact of a home chemotherapy program (HCP) for pediatric oncology patients. RATIONALE: Factors that led to initiation of an HCP included availability of specially trained nurses and programmable ambulatory infusion devices at local home care agencies, routine central venous catheter placement, inpatient bed space shortages, and the availability of ondansetron. SETTING: Chemotherapy delivery in the home setting from June 1991 through June 1994. DESIGN: Charge data and nausea and vomiting severity data were collected for patients treated through the HCP. METHODS: Economic impact was calculated by incorporating and summing all charge categories associated with hospital admission for chemotherapy (HAC) versus delivery by the HCP. All data were adjusted for 1993 dollars, and reflect changes for the average patient size (1 m2). Charge data for each chemotherapy protocol delivered in the home were analyzed by calculating the differences between HAC and HCP charges using the following formula: charge difference (HAC - HCP) per protocol times the number of courses. Total economic impact was calculated by summing the differences in charges for each protocol. RESULTS: A total of 262 chemotherapy courses were given to 44 patients (mean age 9.5 +/- 5.1 y) through the HCP, which represented 1012 patient care days and 24 different chemotherapy protocols. Monetary savings from the HCP ranged from $5180 per course of ifosfamide plus etoposide to $367 per course for high-dose methotrexate. Total monetary savings from the HCP during the 3-year period was $640,793. Successful control of nausea and vomiting with a combination of ondansetron plus methylprednisolone was achieved in approximately 80% of the patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy protocols. CONCLUSIONS: HCP for pediatric oncology patients results in substantial monetary savings to payors. Effective control of nausea and vomiting can be accomplished at home in the majority of patients with an ondansetron-based antiemetic regimen.

Nilutamide: an antiandrogen for the treatment of prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To review the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and adverse effects of nilutamide and to compare this agent with the currently marketed nonsteroidal antiandrogens (i.e., bicalutamide, flutamide) by critically analyzing the published literature. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE (1980-1995) and CANCERLIT (1991-1995) were searched for English-language publications using the terms nilutamide, bicalutamide, and flutamide alone, and either nilutamide or androgen antagonists in combination with prostatic neoplasms. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: All articles with subject matter on nilutamide, bicalutamide, and flutamide were considered for inclusion. For studies published in more than one journal, the first publication was used unless a subsequent publication included additional or follow-up data, in which case the latter publication was cited instead. DATA SYNTHESIS: Nilutamide was effective in combination with orchiectomy in improving responses in patients with advanced prostate cancer. However, patient survival was not improved in these trials, and improvements in bone pain did not usually result in improved performance status in these patients. The few trials of nilutamide monotherapy or nilutamide in combination with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog are too small to draw meaningful conclusions regarding its efficacy or its role in the treatment of advanced prostate cancer. No comparative trials of nilutamide with other antiandrogens and no analysis of the impact of nilutamide on patient quality of life are currently available. Nilutamide appears to produce a higher frequency of adverse effects than the other currently marketed nonsteroidal antiandrogens, bicalutamide and flutamide. CONCLUSIONS: Nilutamide does not appear to represent a major advance in the treatment of advanced prostate cancer and appears to be somewhat inferior to both flutamide and bicalutamide with regard to adverse effects. Nilutamide should not be considered the antiandrogen of choice in the treatment of advanced prostate cancer.

Ethical issues regarding study designs used in serotonin-antagonist drug development.

The time has come to develop new methods for the evaluation of antiemetic compounds. The well-established tenet that combination antiemetic therapy is superior to that achieved with any single agent for severely emetogenic cisplatin-containing chemotherapy does not warrant reevaluation with future cancer patients whenever a new antiemetic enters Phase II and III evaluation. New trials should instead focus on the more important issues of whether the new agent in combination offers comparable or superior efficacy to that achievable with the current standard antiemetic regimen for both acute and delayed nausea and vomiting. While proof of efficacy is crucial in drug trials, adequacy of patient care needs to be the first and foremost priority in any trial.

Health care outcomes case study: Febrile neutropenia.

A case study of the clinical and economic impact of filgrastim in cancer patients in the home care setting is described. The risk of febrile neutropenia is greatly reduced when filgrastim therapy is begun prophylactically after a course of antineoplastic drug therapy. Such use of filgrastim may also reduce the need for hospitalization, prevent mucositis, and enable the next course of chemotherapy to be administered on schedule. Investigators at the University of New Mexico, noting studies showing merit in early hospital discharge of pediatric cancer patients with febrile neutropenia, decided to take the approach a step further by treatment febrile neutropenia entirely at home. Patients seen in the pediatric oncology clinic at the university hospital were considered candidates for home treatment if they had stable vital signs, were already receiving filgrastim after the completion of cancer chemotherapy, and lived within one hour of the hospital. Six cancer patients 2-17 years of age were studied between August 1992 and February 1994. These patients had 16 episodes of febrile neutropenia that were treated at home. The drug regimen consisted of prophylactic filgrastim (begun the day after completion of a course of antineoplastic therapy) and ceftazidime (when febrile neutropenia developed). None of the children were readmitted to the hospital. Infections resolved within 12 days in all cases. The total charge for treating the 16 episodes at home was $22,400 (drug charge for ceftazidime, visits by nurses, infusion-pump rental, and ancillary charges). The total charge for hospital treatment of these episodes would be $112,924 (bed charge and pharmacy charge). The difference suggests a potential savings of $90,524 from home care for this small group of patients. Treating febrile neutropenia in pediatric cancer patients at home is effective and cost-efficient if the patients are clinically stable and prophylactic filgrastim therapy has been started after the completion of cancer chemotherapy.

Assessment of chemotherapy-induced emesis and evaluation of a reduced-dose intravenous ondansetron regimen in pediatric outpatients with leukemia.

OBJECTIVE: To measure the severity of nausea and vomiting in pediatric patients receiving intravenous or intrathecal chemotherapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia and to evaluate the effectiveness of 2 intravenous doses of ondansetron for this condition. DESIGN: Patients were surveyed during repeated treatments of maintenance chemotherapy, given with or without ondansetron, using a repeated measures pretest/posttest design. SETTING: Outpatient pediatric oncology clinic. PATIENT POPULATION: Sixteen pediatric patients (aged 2-15 years, mean 6.2) with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. METHODS: Surveys to assess nausea and vomiting and the extent of interference with daily activities were administered following emetogenic chemotherapy with or without ondansetron. RESULTS: A total of 255 surveys following emetogenic chemotherapy with daunorubicin, cyclophosphamide, carmustine, and etoposide and cytarabine combined, as well as intrathecal therapy with methotrexate, hydrocortisone, and cytarabine, were analyzed. Analysis was performed on surveys of 149 courses without antiemetic therapy and 106 courses after 2 doses of ondansetron 0.15 mg/kg iv. The most emetogenic chemotherapy treatment was the etoposide/cytarabine combination (p < 0.05). Ondansetron completely protected patients (defined as no nausea or no vomiting) during most (> 50%) of the chemotherapy treatments, except for those in which cyclophosphamide was used. Ondansetron provided greater control of nausea and vomiting, a higher percentage of complete protection, and decreased the daily activity interference rating for carmustine and etoposide/cytarabine compared with courses of chemotherapy without antiemetics (p < 0.05). Two intravenous doses of ondansetron also provided durable antiemetic efficacy over time for the most emetogenic chemotherapy treatment (etoposide/cytarabine). CONCLUSIONS: Etoposide/cytarabine proved to be the most emetogenic of the chemotherapy treatments studied. A reduced-dose regimen of intravenous ondansetron was shown to be an effective antiemetic for the outpatient treatments with etoposide/cytarabine and carmustine, but not with cyclophosphamide.

Continuous midazolam infusion for the management of morphine-induced myoclonus.

OBJECTIVE: To describe a patient with morphine-induced myoclonus treated with a continuous infusion of midazolam and continued morphine dose escalation. DESIGN: Single case report. SETTING: Delivery, monitoring, and titration of morphine and midazolam in the patient's home by a homecare agency. RESULTS: The use of high dosages of morphine (i.e., 500 mg/h) produced myoclonic spasms in this patient, which in turn resulted in increasing pain. To allow for continuation of effective analgesia and to control the myoclonic spasms, an infusion of midazolam was initiated and titrated. The midazolam infusion allowed for continuation of the morphine dosage and also permitted further dosage escalation. As morphine dosages were further escalated, it was also necessary to increase the midazolam infusion to control additional myoclonic spasms. CONCLUSIONS: Use of a concomitant midazolam infusion with high doses of morphine appears to be safe and is an effective means of controlling morphine-induced myoclonus. If further dosage increase of morphine are necessary in this setting, increases in the midazolam infusion also may be required.

Transdermal fentanyl disposition in elderly subjects.

The pharmacokinetic characteristics of a 20-cm2 fentanyl 24-hour transdermal patch were compared between 10 healthy elderly subjects 67-87 years and 6 young subjects 19-27 years. All 10 elderly subjects required patch removal prior to 24 h due to adverse effects versus none of the young subjects. The mean patch duration (PD) in elderly subjects was 11.7 +/- 4.9 h, yielding a mean area under the curve from 0 to 60 h (AUC0-60) of 20.4 +/- 10.3 ng h/ml versus a mean AUC0-60 of 21.0 +/- 10.4 ng h/ml in young subjects. Correcting AUC0-60 for PD (AUC0-60/PD) gave a mean value of 2.05 +/- 1.10 ng/ml for elderly subjects, which was significantly greater than the AUC0-60/PD of 0.88 +/- 0.44 ng/ml in young subjects (p = 0.034, Student's t test). The higher serum concentrations reflect increased absorption and/or decreased clearance in the elderly.

Comparative methylprednisolone pharmacokinetics in renal transplant patients receiving double- or triple-drug immunosuppression.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the pharmacokinetics of chronic methylprednisolone therapy in renal transplant patients receiving double-drug (methylprednisolone and azathioprine) and triple-drug (methylprednisolone, azathioprine, and cyclosporine) immunosuppression. DESIGN: Parallel, randomized trial. PATIENTS: Fourteen renal transplant recipients (aged 29-65 y) evaluated in a public, university-affiliated hospital clinic. INTERVENTIONS: All patients received their chronic oral dose of methylprednisolone via a 10-20-minute intravenous infusion. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Serum methylprednisolone concentrations were determined by HPLC and were used to generate pharmacokinetic parameters for this drug. RESULTS: The mean daily methylprednisolone dosage was 19 +/- 19 mg in the double-drug group and 9 +/- 2 mg in the triple-drug group. Mean serum creatinine concentrations were 124 +/- 44 and 124 +/- 27 mumol/L, respectively. Mean methylprednisolone clearances were similar in both groups: 405 +/- 205 (double-drug) and 373 +/- 365 mL/h/kg (triple-drug) (p > 0.05). Mean steady-state volume of distribution was 1.5 +/- 0.8 L/kg in the double-drug group and 1.3 +/- 0.8 L/kg in the triple-drug group (p > 0.05). Plasma half-life ranged from 1.7 to 4.3 h (mean 2.7) in the double-drug group versus 1.4 to 3.4 h (mean 2.6) in the triple-drug group (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that cyclosporine had no definitive influence on methylprednisolone disposition. The results reveal a wide variation in methylprednisolone metabolism in renal transplant recipients receiving either a double- or triple-drug immunosuppressive regimen. Typically, methylprednisolone is prescribed according to a standardized dosing protocol that assumes minimal interpatient variation. Therefore, the pharmacokinetic variability noted in this study may have important clinical implications regarding the development of chronic toxicity (e.g., osteoporosis, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal suppression) and the attainment of successful immunosuppression.

Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor given before dose-intensive cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and cisplatin (DICEP).

Substantial increases in dose-intensity of chemotherapy yield a severalfold increase in complete remission rates and durable responses in several types of malignant disease. Hematopoietic colony-stimulating factors decrease the duration of the resultant severe neutropenia but optimal dosing regimens of these cytokines have not yet been determined. This study was designed to explore the use of both yeast-derived and E. coli-derived GM-CSF given pre- and postchemotherapy with an intensive combination chemotherapy regimen. The chemotherapeutic regimen consisted of cyclophosphamide 5000 mg/m2, etoposide 1500 mg/m2, and cisplatin 150 mg/m2 (DICEP). Patients receiving either yeast-derived GM-CSF (6.5 days) or E. coli-derived GM-CSF (6.0 days) had a shorter duration of severe granulocytopenia with an absolute granulocyte count below 300/microL than patients receiving no GM-CSF (11.0 days, p = 0.0001). Administration of GM-CSF for 6 days immediately preceding DICEP did not further shorten the duration of cytopenia. E. coli-derived GM-CSF given at doses above 5 micrograms/kg was poorly tolerated and offered no hematologic advantage. Lower doses (3 micrograms/kg) of the E. coli product were better tolerated but still produced more toxicities than yeast-derived GM-CSF. The yeast-derived product produced no local skin reactions and decreased the incidence of nonhematologic and all grade 3 or 4 toxicities compared to the control group.

Availability of narcotics and pharmacists' attitudes toward narcotic prescriptions for cancer patients.

OBJECTIVE: To determine narcotic availability and pharmacist apprehension toward dispensing narcotics for cancer patients. DESIGN: Mailing of a one-page survey. SETTING: All pharmacies in the state of New Mexico. PARTICIPANTS: Of the 309 pharmacies, 76.1 percent (235) completed the survey. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Apprehension was significantly elevated for methadone, hydromorphone, and for morphine doses greater than 500 mg/d (p less than 0.001). The most common reasons listed for apprehension were forgery (46.4 percent), theft (40.4 percent), high dosages (23.8 percent), narcotic investigations (18.7 percent), and patient addiction (9.4 percent). Hydromorphone was available (in stock) in 80.5 percent of the pharmacies, followed by morphine 30-mg sustained-release tablets (64.5 percent) and methadone (53.4 percent). The vast majority of pharmacists were willing to order strong narcotics for specific patients. Pharmacists working in chain stores expressed a higher level of apprehension toward dispensing methadone and more frequently cited forgery as a reason for apprehension. Distance from a metropolitan area and practice setting best predicted apprehension to forgery (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacists do not appear to be a major obstruction to adequate analgesia for cancer patients in New Mexico but may require further education regarding lack of narcotic addiction and dosing in patients with cancer.

A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of intravenous vinzolidine.

The semi-synthetic vinca alkaloid vinzolidine was administered to advanced cancer patients as an intravenous bolus on a three day schedule every 21 days. Forty-two patients were treated in this phase I trial. Five partial remissions (breast--1, melanoma--2, renal cancer--2) were seen in 30 evaluable patients. The dose limiting toxicities were myelosuppression and neuropathy. Erratic myelosuppression from course to course within the same patient as seen in previous trials with oral vinzolidine, was not observed with the intravenous formulation. The measured pharmacokinetic parameters conformed best to a 2-compartment model with a mean terminal half-life of 23 hours. The anti-tumor activity observed during this phase I trial and acceptable toxicity provide the basis for initiating phase II studies in selected forms of cancer.

Clinical pharmacology of a novel diarylsulfonylurea anticancer agent.

LY186641 (diarylsulfonylurea, [DSU]) is a novel anticancer agent because of its unique diarylsulfonylurea chemical structure, broad-spectrum antisolid-tumor activity in preclinical models, presumed novel mechanism of action and preclinical toxicities of methemoglobinemia (Met Hgb) and decreased red blood cell (RBC) survival. In this study, the in vitro drug sensitivity of human tumors as well as clinical pharmacology and toxicology of DSU in patients with cancer were examined. DSU was administered orally, daily for 7 days with a 3-week treatment cycle. Dose-limiting toxicities were Met Hgb and RBC hemolysis. The maximum-tolerated dose was found to be 1,200 mg/m2/d for 7 days. In pharmacokinetic studies, DSU was found to have a prolonged serum half-life (approximately 30 hours) and a large area under the plasma disappearance curve (8,883.3 micrograms.hr/mL at 1,200 mg/m2/d). A partial remission was observed in one patient with refractory ovarian cancer. In conclusion, DSU can be safely administered to cancer patients and does display antitumor activity. Potential means of obviating the toxicities of this compound are discussed.

Comparison of cyclosporine assay methodology in the immediate postoperative period of renal transplantation.

The method of measurement of cyclosporine concentrations in renal transplant recipients varies between centers and employs either high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) or radioimmunoassay (RIA). The merit of using HPLC for identifying the parent compound versus the RIA technique, which also measures certain cross-reactive metabolites that accumulate during renal impairment, is controversial. As a result of the lack of uniformity among centers, an abundance of complex literature that describes the disposition of this potent immunosuppressive agent, as well as a wide range of guidelines for therapeutic monitoring, has evolved. To examine the influence of assay methodology on the repeated determination of cyclosporine in the immediate postoperative period, a time when renal function is often unstable, eight renal transplant recipients were studied after i.v. and oral administration on up to four separate occasions. Whole-blood samples were analyzed by HPLC and RIA. Intravenous kinetic analysis yielded a mean total body clearance of 0.24 +/- 0.2 L/min (RIA) and 0.31 +/- 0.1 L/min (HPLC) (p greater than 0.05), the mean volume of distribution was 2.17 +/- 0.6 L/kg (RIA) and 2.75 +/- 1.2 L/kg (HPLC) (p greater than 0.05), and a mean half-life was 11.7 +/- 4.4 h (RIA) and 12.8 +/- 3.8 h (HPLC) (p greater than 0.05). The mean bioavailability was 0.36 +/- 0.23 (RIA) and 0.28 +/- 0.15 (HPLC) (p greater than 0.05). Regression of the 12-h cyclosporine (RIA versus HPLC) concentration yielded a line described by the following equation: RIA = 72 + 1.6 (HPLC).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)