Effect of different pacing protocols on the induction of atrial fibrillation in a transvenously paced sheep model.

In different animal models rapid atrial stimulation led to a shortening and maladaptation to rate of the atrial effective refractory period (AERP). This atrial electrical remodeling resulted in an increased vulnerability to atrial fibrillation (AF). These experimental findings formed the rationale for a stringent pursuit of sinus rhythm in patients with AF, since this would prevent or reverse atrial remodeling. This study tested the hypothesis that a reduction of arrhythmia burden would lead to a decreased vulnerability for AF. Different rapid atrial pacing protocols in a sheep model were used. During 15 weeks, 13 animals were continuously rapid paced and 7 animals were intermittently burst-paced, resulting in rapid atrial activation during 100% versus 33 +/- 4% of the time, respectively. In the continuously paced group, 77% of the animals developed sustained AF (i.e., > 1 hour) versus only 29% in the burst-paced group (P < 0.05). However, there was no difference in mean AERP shortening over time, nor maximal AERP shortening per animal, between both protocols. Minimal AERP was 103 +/- 5 ms in the continuously paced group and 107 +/- 5 in the burst-paced group (P = NS). Significant changes could be identified in effect on P wave duration, AVN function, and atrial dilation. Conduction slowing was more pronounced in the continuously paced group with a maximal P wave duration of 136 +/- 4 ms in this group versus 116 +/- 5 in the burst-paced group (P < 0.05). In the continuously paced group, the right atrial area significantly increased from 2.5 +/- 0.1 cm2 at baseline to 4.2 +/- 0.2 cm2. In the burst-paced group there was no significant atrial dilatation (from 2.6 +/- 0.1 to 2.8 +/- 0.1 cm2). In conclusion, limiting atrial arrhythmia burden slowed the development of sustained AF in this sheep model. This was not mediated by a decreased influence on atrial refractoriness but seemed to be dependent on smaller changes in atrial conduction and dimensions.

Paradoxical undersensing at a high sensitivity in dual chamber pacemakers.

In view of the evolving indications for device therapy in atrial arrhythmia the accurate detection of high rate atrial events is a necessity. In a sheep model of atrial fibrillation (AF) we observed a contradictory behavior of the Thera DR pacemaker. The pacemakers were programmed to deliver burst pacing on detection of sinus rhythm (SR). Paradoxically, progressively more inappropriate bursts were delivered during AF, at a higher sensitivity. This implied that the pacemaker interpreted AF as SR. We assessed the atrial detection of the Thera DR, Diamond, Saphir, and Marathon pacemakers during AF, in a sheep model and in vitro using a waveform generator. By counting the annotated atrial-sensed events reported by the pacemaker we charted the behavior of the pacemakers at different sensitivities. At a higher sensitivity both the Thera DR and the Diamond paradoxically reported fewer atrial events during AF. This behavior led to inappropriate mode switching and incorrect diagnostic data collection. It could be reproduced in vitro. The Marathon did not show this paradoxical undersensing in vivo or in vitro. This paradoxical undersensing at a high sensitivity is dependent on the amplitude of the input signal and could not be explained by an overlap of programmable timing parameters. It is caused by ringing of the atrial sensing amplifier. At high atrial rates and a high sensitivity the ringing of the repetitive atrial signal input results in blanking of the atrial amplifier. This observation may be relevant in the device management of patients with paroxysmal AF.

Different patterns of angiotensin II and atrial natriuretic peptide secretion in a sheep model of atrial fibrillation.

INTRODUCTION: It is well established that rapid atrial rates, as in atrial fibrillation (AF), cause atrial electrical and structural remodeling leading to the maintenance of AF. The role of neurohumoral changes in this pathophysiologic vicious circle remains unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: We followed the concentrations of angiotensin II (AT II) and atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) in a sheep model of AF. The sheep were atrially paced at 600 beats/min for 15 weeks. Electrophysiologic study was performed at regular intervals, and venous blood samples were taken. There was a slow increase in the vulnerability for AF. The cumulative incidence of sustained AF was 80% after 15 weeks of pacing. This increased vulnerability for AF was accompanied by atrial electrical remodeling and an increase in atrial pressure. AT II increased rapidly and stayed elevated: 17+/-4 pg/mL at baseline, and 40+/-11 and 39+/-7 pg/mL after 1 and 12 weeks of pacing, respectively. ANP rose more progressively: 35+/-7 pg/mL at baseline, and 72+/-17, 95+/-10, and 106+/-23 pg/mL after 1, 3, and 12 weeks, respectively. ANP levels correlated with atrial pressure and inducibility of AF. There was no relation between these parameters and AT II levels. CONCLUSION: AT II and ANP increased significantly in this animal model of AF. Elevation of AT II occurs early and seems to be dependent on rapid atrial rate rather than the presence of AF. ANP increased more progressively. It paralleled the inducibility of AF and atrial stretch. Both neurohumoral pathways may form a potential therapeutic target for treatment of patients with AF.