Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Neuron ; 112(11): 1848-1861.e4, 2024 Jun 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38492575

ABSTRACT

Whisker stimulation in awake mice evokes transient suppression of simple spike probability in crus I/II Purkinje cells. Here, we investigated how simple spike suppression arises synaptically, what it encodes, and how it affects cerebellar output. In vitro, monosynaptic parallel fiber (PF)-excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) facilitated strongly, whereas disynaptic inhibitory postsynaptic currents (IPSCs) remained stable, maximizing relative inhibitory strength at the onset of PF activity. Short-term plasticity thus favors the inhibition of Purkinje spikes before PFs facilitate. In vivo, whisker stimulation evoked a 2-6 ms synchronous spike suppression, just 6-8 ms (∼4 synaptic delays) after sensory onset, whereas active whisker movements elicited broadly timed spike rate increases that did not modulate sensory-evoked suppression. Firing in the cerebellar nuclei (CbN) inversely correlated with disinhibition from sensory-evoked simple spike suppressions but was decoupled from slow, non-synchronous movement-associated elevations of Purkinje firing rates. Synchrony thus allows the CbN to high-pass filter Purkinje inputs, facilitating sensory-evoked cerebellar outputs that can drive movements.


Subject(s)
Action Potentials , Cerebellar Nuclei , Purkinje Cells , Synapses , Animals , Purkinje Cells/physiology , Cerebellar Nuclei/physiology , Cerebellar Nuclei/cytology , Mice , Action Potentials/physiology , Synapses/physiology , Vibrissae/physiology , Excitatory Postsynaptic Potentials/physiology , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Inhibitory Postsynaptic Potentials/physiology , Male
2.
J Neurophysiol ; 126(3): 763-776, 2021 09 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34346760

ABSTRACT

Cerebellar Purkinje neurons help compute absolute subsecond timing, but how their firing is affected during repetitive sensory stimulation with consistent subsecond intervals remains unaddressed. Here, we investigated how simple and complex spikes of Purkinje cells change during regular application of air puffs (3.3 Hz for ∼4 min) to the whisker pad of awake, head-fixed female mice. Complex spike responses fell into two categories: those in which firing rates increased (at ∼50 ms) and then fell [complex spike elevated (CxSE) cells] and those in which firing rates decreased (at ∼70 ms) and then rose [complex spike reduced (CxSR) cells]. Both groups had indistinguishable rates of basal complex (∼1.7 Hz) and simple (∼75 Hz) spikes and initially responded to puffs with a well-timed sensory response, consisting of a short-latency (∼15 ms), transient (4 ms) suppression of simple spikes. CxSE more than CxSR cells, however, also showed a longer-latency increase in simple spike rate, previously shown to reflect motor command signals. With repeated puffs, basal simple spike rates dropped greatly in CxSR but not CxSE cells; complex spike rates remained constant, but their temporal precision rose in CxSR cells and fell in CxSE cells. Also over time, transient simple spike suppression gradually disappeared in CxSE cells, suggesting habituation, but remained stable in CxSR cells, suggesting reliable transmission of sensory stimuli. During stimulus omissions, both categories of cells showed complex spike suppression with different latencies. The data indicate two modes by which Purkinje cells transmit regular repetitive stimuli, distinguishable by their climbing fiber signals.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Responses of cerebellar Purkinje cells in awake mice form two categories defined by complex spiking during regular trains of brief, somatosensory stimuli. Cells in which complex spike probability first increases or decreases show simple spike suppressions that habituate or persist, respectively. Stimulus omissions alter complex spiking. The results provide evidence for differential suppression of olivary cells during sensory stimulation and omissions and illustrate that climbing fiber innervation defines Purkinje cell responses to repetitive stimuli.


Subject(s)
Action Potentials , Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory , Purkinje Cells/physiology , Animals , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Reaction Time
3.
Neuron ; 100(3): 624-635.e4, 2018 11 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30269992

ABSTRACT

The Drosophila core circadian circuit contains distinct groups of interacting neurons that give rise to diurnal sleep-wake patterns. Previous work showed that a subset of dorsal neurons 1 (DN1s) are sleep-promoting through their inhibition of activity-promoting circadian pacemakers. Here we show that these anterior-projecting DNs (APDNs) also "exit" the circadian circuitry and communicate with the homeostatic sleep center in higher brain regions to regulate sleep and sleep-wake arousal. These APDNs connect to a small, discrete subset of tubercular-bulbar neurons, which are connected in turn to specific sleep-centric ellipsoid body (EB)-ring neurons of the central complex. Remarkably, activation of the APDNs produces sleep-like oscillations in the EB and affects arousal. The data indicate that this APDN-TuBusup-EB circuit temporally regulates sleep-wake arousal in addition to the previously defined role of the TuBu-EB circuit in vision, navigation, and attention.


Subject(s)
Arousal/physiology , Brain/physiology , Circadian Rhythm/physiology , Nerve Net/physiology , Sleep/physiology , Wakefulness/physiology , Animals , Brain Chemistry/physiology , Drosophila melanogaster , Locomotion/physiology , Male , Nerve Net/chemistry , Optogenetics/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...