ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Advanced practice providers (APPs) are integral to nonsurgical and surgical fields. In surgical settings, APPs work autonomously alongside surgeons to enhance continuity of care. While small-scale studies across various surgical specialties have explored APP utilization, literature specific to the pediatric population is limited. This study assesses the impact of increased APP utilization on productivity within one of the largest pediatric surgery departments in the United States. METHODS: Data was sourced from the Surgery Department Executive Committee (SDEC) annual reports. Descriptive analyses were performed to delineate trends in clinical volumes, OR cases, gross charges, work relative value units (wRVUs), and provider full-time equivalents (FTEs) between October 2011 and September 2023. Secondary analyses were performed from 2016 to 2023, after APP roles were refined in each division. RESULTS: Since 2012, an upward trend is observed in total clinic visits, total OR cases, and OR cases per MD. In 2016, APPs saw 1 clinic patient for every 2.2 seen by MDs, decreasing to a 1:1 ratio by 2023. The MD surgical conversion rate has increased by 20.5% since 2016, while the conversion rate per total clinic volume has decreased by 7.3% over the same period. Total wRVUs and gross charges increased across the department and per provider, despite fewer overall providers since 2021. CONCLUSION: Increased utilization of APPs within the department of surgery may enhance procedural productivity for surgeons while ensuring continued patient access to care. This study highlights the importance of developing care models that optimize the full skillset of APPs.
ABSTRACT
Background: Geographic information systems are powerful tools for characterizing the geospatial factors influencing access to care. As patients with cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) require long-term care, with numerous operations and therapies, access to timely, quality care is extremely important. This study uses population level analysis and geographic information systems to identify United States counties with limited access to American Cleft Palate Association-approved cleft teams. Methods: Natality data were queried from the National Vital Statistics System. Population and geographic data were obtained from the US Census Bureau. The Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) was utilized to account for social inequality. Total births with CL/P, population estimates, SVI, distance to the nearest center, and total centers within 50 km were used to generate the cleft care demand index (CCDI). Results: Ninety-two counties had CCDIs between 66.7 and 100. The highest scoring county, Hidalgo County, Texas, had 62 births with CL/P, population estimate of 888,367 persons, distance to the nearest cleft center of 368.4 km, and SVI of 0.99. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the power of geographic information systems for identifying areas with limited access to approved cleft teams. The CCDI measures cleft burden, socioeconomic disadvantage, and geographic barriers to quantify the demand for approved cleft care in each county. Utilizing these scores can help direct future interventions, outreach efforts, and cleft care center planning.
ABSTRACT
Children born with cleft lip and/or cleft palate may have problems with feeding, speech, and hearing. Collaboration of surgeons and speech pathologists guide cleft care treatment decisions and vary throughout the cleft timeline. This review aims to discuss the role of the speech pathologist and audiologist in the interdisciplinary management of patients with cleft lip and palate, specifically, how the speech pathologists' findings guide surgical decision-making.