The Impact of the Risk Evaluation Mitigation Strategy for Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents on Their Use and the Incidence of Stroke in Medicare Subjects with Chemotherapy-Induced Anemia with Lung and/or Breast Cancers.

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), found to be effective in reducing anemia in chemotherapy-treated cancer patients, also are associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events, including stroke. In an attempt to mitigate the risk, the Food and Drug Administration implemented a Risk Evaluation Mitigation Strategy (REMS) in February 2010. The purpose of this study is to evaluate change over time in the incidence of stroke among these patients before and after implementation of REMS. A retrospective data analysis using the Medicare 5% Sample Dataset, 2008-2011, was performed. Patients had to be 65 years of age or older at the start of at least 1 year of continuous enrollment and to have lung and/or breast cancers along with chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA) in both pre-REMS and post-REMS periods (1Q2008 through 4Q2009 and 1Q2010 through 4Q2011, respectively). Logistic regression was used to evaluate differences in proportions of patients who received ESAs and experienced a stroke pre and post REMS. The pre-REMS cohort included 1252 eligible patients prescribed ESAs; the post-REMS cohort included 949 patients. No statistically significant change in stroke incidence was observed post REMS among patients with CIA who received ESAs. There was a 29.5% decrease in ESA use in patients with lung cancer and a 27.8% decrease in patients with breast cancer. Both were statistically significant. Results adjusted for baseline characteristics and comorbid conditions were similar. There was a statistically significant decrease in ESA use in patients with breast and/or lung cancers post REMS; no statistically significant reduction in the incidence of stroke was observed regardless of cancer type.

Risk evaluation mitigation strategies: the evolution of risk management policy.

The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has the primary regulatory responsibility to ensure that medications are safe and effective both prior to drug approval and while the medication is being actively marketed by manufacturers. The responsibility for safe medications prior to marketing was signed into law in 1938 under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act; however, a significant risk management evolution has taken place since 1938. Additional federal rules, entitled the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act, were established in 2007 and extended the government's oversight through the addition of a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) for certain drugs. REMS is a mandated strategy to manage a known or potentially serious risk associated with a medication or biological product. Reasons for this extension of oversight were driven primarily by the FDA's movement to ensure that patients and providers are better informed of drug therapies and their specific benefits and risks prior to initiation. This article provides an historical perspective of the evolution of medication risk management policy and includes a review of REMS programs, an assessment of the positive and negative aspects of REMS, and provides suggestions for planning and measuring outcomes. In particular, this publication presents an overview of the evolution of the REMS program and its implications.