The utility of stuttering support organization conventions for young people who stutter.

BACKGROUND: Stuttering Support Organizations (SSOs) are places where people who stutter can share their experiences with stuttering and lend support to each other. There is evidence that SSO participation may be helpful in reducing the negative impact of stuttering and promoting positive cognitive and affective changes in adults who stutter. The benefits of participating in SSO organizations for young people, however, are currently unknown. PURPOSE: This study investigated the relationship between attending a multi-day SSO convention and cognitive and affective changes among young people who stutter (YPWS). METHODS: Twenty-two YPWS (ages 10 to 18) were recruited from the 2016 FRIENDS annual convention to participate in this study. FRIENDS is the National Association of Young People Who Stutter. A mixed methods approach was used to collect and analyze quantitative and qualitative data. The Overall Assessment of the Speaker's Experience with Stuttering (OASES) was administered at three times points: pre-convention, post-convention, and three months following the convention. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with seven participants to further explain the quantitative results. RESULTS: Analysis of OASES scores across the three time points indicated that there were significant decreases in the negative impact of stuttering between pre-convention and post-convention measures. Qualitative analysis of semi-structured interview transcripts revealed five themes related to community building, collaborative learning, cognitive and communicative changes, self-acceptance, and normalizing stuttering. CONCLUSION: SSOs may be beneficial in reducing the negative impact of stuttering and should be considered a potentially valuable addition to traditional therapy for stuttering.

The Relationship Between Grammatical Development and Disfluencies in Preschool Children Who Stutter and Those Who Recover.

PURPOSE: The dual diathesis stressor model indicates that a mismatch between a child's endogenous linguistic abilities and exogenous linguistic contexts is one factor that contributes to stuttering behavior. In the present study, we used a developmental framework to investigate if reducing the gap between endogenous and exogenous linguistics factors would result in less disfluency for typical children, children who recover from stuttering (CWS-R), and children who persist. METHOD: Children between 28 and 43 months of age participated in this study: 8 typical children, 5 CWS-R, and 8 children who persist. The children were followed for 18 months with language samples collected every 6 months. The Index of Productive Syntax (Scarborough, 1990) served as a measure of endogenous grammatical ability. Length and complexity of active declarative sentences served as a measure of exogenous linguistic demand. A hierarchical linear model analysis was conducted using a mixed-model approach. RESULTS: The results partially corroborate the dual diathesis stressor model. Disfluencies significantly decreased in CWS-R as grammatical abilities (not age) increased. Language development may serve as a protective factor or catalyst for recovery for CWS-R. As grammatical ability grew and the gap between linguistic ability and demand decreased; however, none of the three groups was more likely to produce disfluencies in longer and more complex utterances.