Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 24
Filter
1.
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract ; 18(3): 463-84, 2013 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22717991

ABSTRACT

Professionalism remains a substantive theme in medical literature. There is an emerging emphasis on sociological and complex adaptive systems perspectives that refocuses attention from just the individual role to working within one's system to enact professionalism in practice. Reflecting on responses to professional dilemmas may be one method to help practicing physicians identify both internal and external factors contributing to (un) professional behavior. We present a rationale and theoretical framework that supports and guides a reflective approach to the self assessment of professionalism. Guided by principles grounded in this theoretical framework, we developed and piloted a set of vignettes on professionally challenging situations, designed to stimulate reflection in practicing physicians. Findings show that participants found the vignettes to be authentic and typical, and reported the group experience as facilitative around discussions of professional ambiguity. Providing an opportunity for physicians to reflect on professional behavior in an open and safe forum may be a practical way to guide physicians to assess themselves on professional behavior and engage with the complexities of their work. The finding that the focus groups led to reflection at a group level suggests that effective reflection on professional behavior may require a socially interactive process. Emphasizing both the behaviors and the internal and external context in which they occur can thus be viewed as critically important for understanding professionalism in practicing physicians.


Subject(s)
Physicians/standards , Professional Competence , Teaching/methods , Adult , Education, Medical, Continuing/methods , Female , Focus Groups , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Physician's Role/psychology , Physicians/psychology , Self-Assessment
3.
Qual Saf Health Care ; 13(1): 26-31, 2004 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14757796

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Data feedback is a fundamental component of quality improvement efforts, but previous studies provide mixed results on its effectiveness. This study illustrates the diversity of hospital based efforts at data feedback and highlights successful strategies and common pitfalls in designing and implementing data feedback to support performance improvement. METHODS: Open ended interviews with 45 clinical and administrative staff in eight US hospitals in 2000 concerning their perceptions about the effectiveness of data feedback in supporting performance improvement efforts were analysed. The hospitals were chosen to represent a range of sizes, geographical regions, and beta blocker improvement rates over a 3 year period. Data were organized and analyzed in NUD-IST 4 using the constant comparative method of qualitative data analysis. RESULTS: Although the data feedback efforts at the hospitals were diverse, the interviews suggested that seven key themes may be important: (1) data must be perceived by physicians as valid to motivate change; (2) it takes time to develop the credibility of data within a hospital; (3) the source and timeliness of data are critical to perceived validity; (4) benchmarking improves the meaningfulness of data feedback; (5) physician leaders can enhance the effectiveness of data feedback; (6) data feedback that profiles an individual physician's practices can be effective but may be perceived as punitive; (7) data feedback must persist to sustain improved performance. Embedded in several themes was the view that the effectiveness of data feedback depends not only on the quality and timeliness of the data, but also on the organizational context in which such efforts are implemented. CONCLUSIONS: Data feedback is a complex and textured concept. Data feedback strategies that might be most effective are suggested, as well as potential pitfalls in using data to promote performance improvement.


Subject(s)
Total Quality Management/methods , Adrenergic beta-Antagonists/administration & dosage , Health Services Research , Hospital Administration , Humans , Interviews as Topic , United States
4.
Acad Med ; 76(12): 1257-60, 2001 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11739054

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To determine whether a resident physician can be as effective as a faculty opinion leader in changing physicians' compliance with a hypertension practice guideline. METHOD: At a general internal medicine clinic associated with an internal medicine residency program, sequential charts were reviewed for patients with uncontrolled or new-onset hypertension who were seen routinely during a two-week period. Subsequently, 23 providers were randomly assigned to an academic intervention to implement a hypertension practice guideline led by a single second-year resident instructor (RI), and 21 providers were assigned to the same intervention led by a single staff internist (SI) with an interest in hypertension. The intervention involved academic detailing, chart audit with feedback, and behavior reinforcement. Six weeks later, the chart audit was repeated to assess the change in practice patterns among providers taught by the RI compared with those taught by the SI. RESULTS: Overall, management consistent with the practice guideline improved from 32% (51/157) to 45% (56/123) (p < .01) after the intervention. This change was due to improvement in the care provided by providers from the SI-led intervention: 28% (17/60) to 57% (26/46) (p < .003). Providers from the RI-led intervention showed no improvement: 35% (34/97) to 39% (30/77) (p = NS). CONCLUSIONS: This intervention was effective in improving providers' compliance with a hypertension practice guideline, but only when led by a faculty opinion leader. A resident instructor using the same format was unable to change the providers' behaviors.


Subject(s)
Hypertension/therapy , Internship and Residency , Medical Staff, Hospital/education , Program Evaluation , Teaching , Guideline Adherence , Humans , Medical Audit , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Practice Patterns, Physicians'
5.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 49(8): 1101-4, 2001 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11555074

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether screening mammography is suitably targeted to older women who are most likely to benefit. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: New Haven County, Connecticut. PARTICIPANTS: Eight hundred forty-four community-dwelling older women were interviewed as part of the 1990 New Haven Established Populations for the Epidemiologic Study of the Elderly (EPESE) program. MEASUREMENTS: Mammography use was ascertained from Medicare Part B claims data. A four-level prognostic mortality index was developed using items previously shown to be predictive of mortality. Mammography use and all-cause mortality were evaluated by prognostic stage over a 5-year period, January 1, 1991, to December 31, 1995. RESULTS: Five-year mortality increased steadily with each prognostic stage (12% to 68%, P = .001), whereas the 5-year mammography use rate declined (48% to 7%, P = .001). Over half the women (53%) in the most favorable prognostic group did not receive a mammogram, whereas 13% in the two worst prognostic groups received at least one mammogram. CONCLUSION: Screening mammography may be underutilized among older women who are the most likely to benefit and overutilized among those who are unlikely to benefit.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/prevention & control , Health Services for the Aged/organization & administration , Mammography/statistics & numerical data , Women's Health , Activities of Daily Living , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Connecticut/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Medicare/statistics & numerical data , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Prospective Studies , Referral and Consultation , Risk Factors , United States
6.
Am J Med ; 111(3): 203-10, 2001 Aug 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11530031

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: A statewide quality improvement initiative was conducted in Connecticut to improve process-of-care performance and to decrease length of stay for patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia. SETTING AND METHODS: Data were collected on 1,242 elderly (> or =65 years) pneumonia patients hospitalized at 31 of 32 acute care hospitals between January 16, 1995, and March 15, 1996, and on 1,146 patients hospitalized between January 1, 1997, and June 30, 1997. Interventions included feedback of performance data (Qualidigm, the Connecticut Peer Review Organization), dissemination of an evidence-based pneumonia critical pathway (Connecticut Thoracic Society), and sharing of pathway implementation experiences (hospitals). Process and outcome measures included early antibiotic administration, blood culture collection, oxygenation assessment, length of stay, 30-day mortality, and 30-day readmission rates. Analyses were adjusted for severity of illness and hospital-specific practice patterns. RESULTS: After the statewide initiative, improvements were noted in antibiotic administration within 8 hours of hospital arrival (improvement from 83.4% to 88.8%, relative risk [RR] = 1.21; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.10 to 1.32), oxygenation assessment within 24 hours of hospital arrival (93.6% to 95.4%; RR = 1.23, 95% CI: 1.11 to 1.38), and length of stay (7 days to 5 days, P <0.001). There were no significant changes in blood culture collection within 24 hours of hospital arrival, blood culture collection before antibiotic administration, 30-day mortality, or 30-day readmission rates. CONCLUSIONS: Statewide improvements were demonstrated in the care of hospitalized pneumonia patients concurrent with a multifaceted quality improvement intervention. Further research is needed to separate the effects of the quality improvement interventions from secular trends.


Subject(s)
Critical Pathways/organization & administration , Hospitals/standards , Pneumonia/therapy , Total Quality Management/organization & administration , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Community-Acquired Infections/therapy , Connecticut , Female , Hospitals/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Information Services , Length of Stay , Male , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Pilot Projects , Professional Review Organizations , Risk
7.
J Gen Intern Med ; 16(7): 427-34, 2001 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11520379

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To improve the quality and specificity of written evaluations by faculty attendings of internal medicine residents during inpatient rotations. DESIGN: Prospective randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Four hospitals: tertiary care university hospital, Veterans' Administration hospital, and two community hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-eight faculty and 157 residents from categorical and primary-care internal medicine residency training programs rotating on inpatient general medicine teams. INTERVENTION: Focused 20-minute educational session on evaluation and feedback, accompanied by 3 by 5 reminder card and diary, given to faculty at the start of their attending month. PRIMARY OUTCOMES: 1) number of written comments from faculty specific to unique, preselected dimensions of competence; 2) number of written comments from faculty describing a specific resident behavior or providing a recommendation; and 3) resident Likert-scale ratings of the quantity and effect of feedback received from faculty. Faculty in the intervention group provided more written comments specific to defined dimensions of competence, a median of three comments per evaluation form versus two in the control group, but when adjusted for clustering by faculty, the difference was not statistically significant (P =.09). Regarding feedback, residents in the intervention group rated the quantity significantly higher (P =.04) and were significantly more likely to make changes in clinical management of patients than residents in the control group (P =.04). CONCLUSIONS: A brief, focused educational intervention delivered to faculty prior to the start of a ward rotation appears to have a modest effect on faculty behavior for written evaluations and promoted higher quality feedback given to house staff.


Subject(s)
Educational Measurement , Faculty, Medical , Internal Medicine/education , Internship and Residency/methods , Clinical Competence , Female , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies , Statistics as Topic , Surveys and Questionnaires
8.
JAMA ; 285(20): 2604-11, 2001.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11368734

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: Based on evidence that beta-blockers can reduce mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), many hospitals have initiated performance improvement efforts to increase prescription of beta-blockers at discharge. Determination of the factors associated with such improvements may provide guidance to hospitals that have been less successful in increasing beta-blocker use. OBJECTIVES: To identify factors that may influence the success of improvement efforts to increase beta-blocker use after AMI and to develop a taxonomy for classifying such efforts. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Qualitative study in which data were gathered from in-depth interviews conducted in March-June 2000 with 45 key physician, nursing, quality management, and administrative participants at 8 US hospitals chosen to represent a range of hospital sizes, geographic regions, and changes in beta-blocker use rates between October 1996 and September 1999. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Initiatives, strategies, and approaches to improve care for patients with AMI. RESULTS: The interviews revealed 6 broad factors that characterized hospital-based improvement efforts: goals of the efforts, administrative support, support among clinicians, design and implementation of improvement initiatives, use of data, and modifying variables. Hospitals with greater improvements in beta-blocker use over time demonstrated 4 characteristics not found in hospitals with less or no improvement: shared goals for improvement, substantial administrative support, strong physician leadership advocating beta-blocker use, and use of credible data feedback. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a context for understanding efforts to improve care in the hospital setting by describing a taxonomy for classifying and evaluating such efforts. In addition, the study suggests possible elements of successful efforts to increase beta-blocker use for patients with AMI.


Subject(s)
Adrenergic beta-Antagonists/therapeutic use , Cardiology Service, Hospital/standards , Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Myocardial Infarction/drug therapy , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Drug Utilization , Humans , Myocardial Infarction/prevention & control , Total Quality Management , United States
9.
Health Care Financ Rev ; 22(4): 49-61, 2001.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12378781

ABSTRACT

This article presents findings about the mammography screening experience of Medicare members of a health maintenance organization (HMO). Based on a mail survey of 309 women, we assessed factors that may be facilitators or barriers to this service for older women. The results indicate that these respondents generally are receiving timely mammograms; over three-quarters (79 percent) reported having a mammogram in the past 2 years. Multivariate analysis showed that women who were younger (under 75 years of age), believed in the importance of screening, had been told by a physician to obtain a mammogram, and were more satisfied with their physician and more likely to report mammography use.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Health Maintenance Organizations/statistics & numerical data , Mammography/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Breast Neoplasms/prevention & control , Connecticut , Demography , Diagnostic Tests, Routine/statistics & numerical data , Female , Health Care Surveys , Health Services Accessibility , Health Status , Humans , Medicare , Multivariate Analysis , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Surveys and Questionnaires , Women's Health
10.
Am J Psychiatry ; 157(12): 1933-40, 2000 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11097953

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The Committee on Research on Psychiatric Treatments of the American Psychiatric Association identified treatment of major depression during pregnancy as a priority area for improvement in clinical management. The goal of this article was to assist physicians in optimizing treatment plans for childbearing women. METHOD: The authors' work group developed a decision-making model designed to structure the information delivered to pregnant women in the context of the risk-benefit discussion. Perspectives of forensic and decision-making experts were incorporated. RESULTS: The model directs the psychiatrist to structure the problem through diagnostic formulation and identification of treatment options for depression. Reproductive toxicity in five domains (intrauterine fetal death, physical malformations, growth impairment, behavioral teratogenicity, and neonatal toxicity) is reviewed for the potential somatic treatments. The illness (depression) also is characterized by symptoms of somatic dysregulation that compromise health during pregnancy. The patient actively participates and provides her evaluation of the acceptability of the various treatments and outcomes. Her capacity to participate in this process provides evidence of competence to consent. Included in the decision-making process are the patient's significant others and obstetrical physician. The process is ongoing, with the need for incorporation of additional data as the pregnancy and treatment response progress. CONCLUSIONS: The conceptual model provides structure to a process that is frequently stressful for both patients and psychiatrists. By applying the model, clinicians will ensure that critical aspects of the risk-benefit discussion are included in their care of pregnant women.


Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder/therapy , Pregnancy Complications/therapy , Adult , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Depressive Disorder/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder/psychology , Female , Forensic Psychiatry , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Informed Consent , Jurisprudence , Patient Care Planning , Physician-Patient Relations , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications/diagnosis , Pregnancy Complications/psychology , Psychiatry/organization & administration , Risk Assessment , Treatment Outcome
11.
J Gen Intern Med ; 15(10): 694-701, 2000 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11089712

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To identify what factors men consider important when choosing treatment for prostate cancer, and to assess why men reject watchful waiting as a treatment option. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred two consecutive men with newly diagnosed localized prostate cancer identified from hospital and community-based urology practice groups. MEASUREMENTS: Patients were asked open-ended questions about likes and dislikes of all treatments considered, how they chose their treatment, and reasons for rejecting watchful waiting. The interviews were conducted in person, after the men had made a treatment decision but before they received the treatment. MAIN RESULTS: The most common reasons for liking a treatment were removal of tumor for radical prostatectomy (RP) (n = 15), evidence for external beam radiation (EBRT) (n = 6), and short duration of therapy for brachytherapy (seeds) (n = 25). The most frequently cited dislikes were high risk of incontinence for RP (n = 46), long duration of therapy for EBRT (n = 29), and lack of evidence for seeds (n = 16). Only 12 men chose watchful waiting. Fear of future consequences, cited by 64% (n = 90) of men, was the most common reason to reject watchful waiting. CONCLUSION: In discussing treatment options for localized prostate cancer, clinicians, including primary care providers, should recognize that patients' decisions are often based on specific beliefs regarding each therapy's intrinsic characteristics, supporting evidence, or pattern of complications. Even if patients do not recall a physician recommendation against watchful waiting, this option may not be chosen because of fear of future consequences.


Subject(s)
Decision Making , Prostatic Neoplasms/therapy , Aged , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Male , Surveys and Questionnaires
12.
J Gen Intern Med ; 15(9): 632-7, 2000 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11029677

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess reasons why patients undergo elective percutaneous coronary revascularization (PCR), patient expectations of the benefits of PCR, and their understanding of the risks associated with PCR. We hypothesized that patients overestimate the benefits and underestimate the risks associated with PCR. DESIGN: A prospective, semistructured questionnaire. PARTICIPANTS: Patients undergoing their first elective PCR. MAIN RESULTS: Fifty-two consecutive patients with a mean age of 64.3 years (range 39-87) completed the interview. Although 30 (57%) patients cited relief of symptoms as at least 1 reason to have PCR, 32 (62%) patients cited either an abnormal diagnostic test result (i.e., exercise stress test or catheterization) or "pathophysiologic" problem (i.e., "I have a blockage"), with 17 patients (33%) citing these reasons alone as indications for PCR. Thirty-nine (75%) patients believed PCR would prevent a future myocardial infarction, and 37 (71%) patients felt PCR would prolong their life. Regarding the potential complications, only 24 patients (46%) could recall at least 1 possible complication. However, on a Deber questionnaire, the majority of patients (67%) stated that they should determine either mostly alone or equally with a physician how acceptable the risks of the procedure are for themselves. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients had unrealistic expectations about the long-term benefits of elective PCR and was not aware of the potential risks, even though they expressed a strong interest in participating in the decision to have PCR. More work is needed to define the optimal strategy to educate patients about the benefits and risks of elective PCR, and whether such education will affect patient decision making.


Subject(s)
Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary , Elective Surgical Procedures , Patient Satisfaction , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Education as Topic , Prospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires
13.
Am J Med Qual ; 15(3): 106-13, 2000.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10872260

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to investigate what happened to improve the quality of care for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) at all 32 nonfederal hospitals in Connecticut and to assess the impact of the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project (CCP) on quality improvement (QI) activities for AMI. We performed a questionnaire study with secondary analyses using the CCP database. On-site interviews were conducted with QI directors at all 32 Connecticut nonfederal hospitals that participated in the Health Care Financing Administration's Cooperative Cardiovascular Project (CCP) in 1992-93 and 1995. The interviews sought information about the makeup of QI departments, specific approaches used to improve the care of patients with AMI, and the perceived value of the CCP to each individual hospital. Results showed that the number of full-time equivalents (FTEs) and FTEs per beds employed in QI departments ranged from 1 to 30 and from 0.4 to 7.9, respectively, with a registered nurse most often serving as the department head (27/32). Over half of the departments (17/32) had additional responsibilities. The majority (25/32) used some combination of physician champions, multidisciplinary QI teams, standing orders, or critical pathways to effect change in AMI care. Finally, 26 of the 32 hospitals believed the CCP was valuable because it provided credible benchmark data, a catalyst for change, or a specific focus on processes of care needing improvement in AMI. Despite great variability in institutional resources, all 32 hospitals used a similar combination of QI approaches to effect change in AMI care. However, there is variable scientific evidence supporting these approaches. Externally sponsored projects such as the CCP appear to play a useful role for individual hospitals. Defining the optimal methods of QI is difficult given that hospitals are using complex combinations of nonstandardized improvement interventions.


Subject(s)
Hospitals , Myocardial Infarction , Professional Review Organizations , Connecticut/epidemiology , Humans , Myocardial Infarction/mortality , Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Organizational Innovation , Professional Review Organizations/organization & administration , Program Evaluation , Quality Assurance, Health Care/methods
14.
Am J Med ; 107(4): 324-31, 1999 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10527033

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: While critical pathways have become a popular strategy to improve the quality of care, their effectiveness is not well defined. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of a critical pathway on processes of care and outcomes for Medicare patients admitted with acute myocardial infarction. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional and longitudinal cohort study was made of Medicare patients aged 65 years and older hospitalized at 32 nonfederal Connecticut hospitals with a principal diagnosis of myocardial infarction during two periods: June 1, 1992, to February 28, 1993, and August 1, 1995, to November 30, 1995. The main endpoints of the cross-sectional analyses for the 1995 cohort were the proportion of patients without contraindications who received evidence-based medical therapies, length of stay, and 30-day mortality. Hospitals with specific critical pathways for patients with myocardial infarction were compared with hospitals without critical pathways. The main endpoints of the longitudinal analyses were change between 1992-93 and 1995 in the proportion of patients receiving evidence-based medical therapies, length of stay, and 30-day mortality. RESULTS: Ten hospitals developed critical pathways between 1992-93 and 1995. Eighteen of 22 nonpathway hospitals employed some combination of standard orders, multidisciplinary teams, or physician champions. Patients admitted to hospitals with critical pathways did not have greater use of aspirin within the first day, during hospitalization, or at discharge; beta-blockers within the first day or at discharge; reperfusion therapy; or use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors at discharge in 1995. The mean (+/- SD) length of stay in 1995 was not significantly different between pathway (7.8 +/- 4.6 days) versus nonpathway hospitals (8.0 +/- 4.2 days), and the change in length of stay between 1992-93 and 1995 was 2.2 days for pathway hospitals and 2.3 days for nonpathway hospitals. Patients admitted to critical pathway hospitals had lower 30-day mortality in 1995 (8.6% versus 11.6% for nonpathway hospitals, P = 0.10) and in 1992-93 (12.6% versus 13.8%, P = 0.39), but the differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Hospitals that instituted critical pathways did not have increased use of proven medical therapies, shorter lengths of stay, or reductions in mortality compared with other hospitals that commonly used alternative approaches to quality improvement among Medicare patients with myocardial infarction.


Subject(s)
Critical Pathways , Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Aged , Analysis of Variance , Connecticut/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Length of Stay , Logistic Models , Male , Medicare , Myocardial Infarction/mortality , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Pilot Projects , Retrospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index , United States
16.
Am J Med ; 106(2): 206-10, 1999 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10230751

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: We sought to survey residents' perceptions regarding the In-Training Examination in Internal Medicine and to assess the ability of faculty members to evaluate the knowledge base of internal medicine residents. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Residents were asked about the perceived utility of the In-Training Examination and related self-directed educational activities. Residents predicted their own performance on the examination (into upper, middle, or lower tertile). Faculty predicted housestaffs scores, and residents predicted the scores of interns. RESULTS: Most residents (35/36; 97%) believed that the examination was useful, and 91% modified their study habits or clinical rotation schedule based on its results. Approximately half of the residents accurately predicted into which tertile they would score. Faculty predictions of resident performance on the examination were accurate 49% of the time, and resident predictions of intern scores were accurate 38% of the time. The sensitivity ofa lower-tertile prediction by faculty was 34%, with a specificity of 90%. The sensitivity of a resident prediction of a lower-tertile intern score was 15%, with a specificity of 98%. Both faculty and residents were more likely to overestimate than underestimate examination scores. CONCLUSION: Residents believe that the In-Training Examination is useful and frequently initiate educational interventions based on results. Faculty and residents lack the ability to evaluate accurately the knowledge of trainees that they supervise. In particular, both groups may be unable to identify trainees who are deficient in this element of clinical competence.


Subject(s)
Clinical Competence , Internal Medicine/education , Internship and Residency , Students, Medical , Humans , United States
17.
JAMA ; 281(11): 1037-41, 1999 Mar 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10086441

ABSTRACT

Virtually every course of medical action is associated with some adverse risk to the patient. Discussing these risks with patients is a fundamental duty of physicians both to fulfill a role as trusted adviser and to promote the ethical principle of autonomy (particularly as embodied in the doctrine of informed consent). Discussing medical risk is a difficult task to accomplish appropriately. Challenges stem from gaps in the physician's knowledge about pertinent risks, uncertainty about how much and what kind of information to communicate, and difficulties in communicating risk information in a format that is clearly understood by most patients. For example, a discussion of the risk of undergoing a procedure should be accompanied by a discussion of the risk of not undergoing a procedure. This article describes basic characteristics of risk information, outlines major challenges in communicating risk information, and suggests several ways to communicate risk information to patients in an understandable format. Ultimately, a combination of formats (eg, qualitative, quantitative, and graphic) may best accommodate the widely varying needs, preferences, and abilities of patients. Such communication will help the physician accomplish the fundamental duty of teaching the patient the information necessary to make an informed and appropriate decision.


Subject(s)
Decision Making , Disclosure , Patient Participation , Physician-Patient Relations , Risk Assessment , Comprehension , Humans , Uncertainty
19.
Acad Med ; 73(8): 901-3, 1998 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9736851

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To examine the effect on residents' compliance with preventive health guidelines of an intensive quality-improvement program using medical record audits and individualized feedback. METHOD: The before-and-after study was set in a general internal medicine clinic at a military teaching hospital. In 1995, the authors retrospectively reviewed 280 medical records to determine whether, after the hospital had started an audit-and-feedback program in 1994, residents' compliance rates had risen for preventive health interventions. The study looked at both audited and non-audited interventions. RESULTS: The residents' compliance rates significantly improved for the audited interventions (tetanus immunizations, breast examination, and rectal examination). They also had higher compliance rates for six of the seven non-audited interventions. CONCLUSIONS: An intensive medical record audit with individualized feedback can produce exceptionally high levels of compliance with preventive care practices among internal medicine residents. Furthermore, the improved compliance is generalizable to other health care measures not directly targeted for audit.


Subject(s)
Guideline Adherence , Internship and Residency , Medical Audit , Preventive Health Services/standards , Feedback , Female , Hospitals, Military , Humans , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Quality of Health Care , Retrospective Studies , Virginia
20.
Mil Med ; 163(7): 439-43, 1998 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9695606

ABSTRACT

A total of 628 female and 526 male U.S. military personnel completed a health survey questionnaire at the completion of four shipboard deployments lasting 10 to 180 days (mean, 57 days). During deployment, women visited clinic (sick call) at significantly higher rates than men: 189 versus 117 visits per week per 1,000 personnel. Except for generally minor gynecological conditions, women and men had similar medical problems. Upper respiratory complaints and requests for contraceptive pills were the most common reasons for clinic visits among women. The majority of sailors felt that they had received appropriate medical care, although fewer women (66%) than men (78%) were satisfied. Levels of cigarette and alcohol use and sexual activity were comparable among women and men and corresponded to those of the general U.S. population of young adults. Because of high levels of health, most medical needs of women sailors can be managed readily by providing routine gynecological care and by minor additions to the shipboard pharmacy.


Subject(s)
Health Services Needs and Demand/statistics & numerical data , Military Personnel , Women's Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Male , Naval Medicine/statistics & numerical data , Ships , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...