Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
J Plast Surg Hand Surg ; 51(1): 27-37, 2017 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28218551

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Adequate velopharyngeal function and speech are main goals in the treatment of cleft palate. The objective was to investigate if there were differences in velopharyngeal competency (VPC) and hypernasality at age 5 years in children with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) operated on with different surgical methods for primary palatal repair. A secondary aim was to estimate burden of care in terms of received additional secondary surgeries and speech therapy. DESIGN: Three parallel group, randomised clinical trials were undertaken as an international multicentre study by 10 cleft teams in five countries: Denmark, Finland, Sweden, Norway, and the UK. METHODS: Three different surgical protocols for primary palatal repair were tested against a common procedure in the total cohort of 448 children born with a non-syndromic UCLP. Speech audio and video recordings of 391 children (136 girls, 255 boys) were available and perceptually analysed. The main outcome measures were VPC and hypernasality from blinded assessments. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the prevalences in the arms in any of the trials. VPC: Trial 1, A: 58%, B: 61%; Trial 2, A: 57%, C: 54%; Trial 3, A: 35%, D: 51%. No hypernasality: Trial 1, A: 54%, B: 44%; Trial 2, A: 47%, C: 51%; Trial 3, A: 34%, D: 49%. CONCLUSIONS: No differences were found regarding VPC and hypernasality at age 5 years after different methods for primary palatal repair. The burden of care in terms of secondary pharyngeal surgeries, number of fistulae, and speech therapy visits differed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN29932826.


Subject(s)
Cleft Lip/surgery , Cleft Palate/surgery , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Speech Disorders/therapy , Velopharyngeal Insufficiency/prevention & control , Child, Preschool , Cleft Lip/diagnosis , Cleft Palate/diagnosis , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Infant , Internationality , Male , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/physiopathology , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Plastic Surgery Procedures/adverse effects , Recovery of Function , Risk Assessment , Speech Disorders/etiology , Speech Disorders/physiopathology , Speech Therapy/methods , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Velopharyngeal Insufficiency/etiology
2.
J Plast Surg Hand Surg ; 51(1): 38-51, 2017 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28218556

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Normal articulation before school start is a main objective in cleft palate treatment. The aim was to investigate if differences exist in consonant proficiency at age 5 years between children with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) randomised to different surgical protocols for primary palatal repair. A secondary aim was to estimate burden of care in terms of received additional secondary surgeries and speech therapy. DESIGN: Three parallel group, randomised clinical trials were undertaken as an international multicentre study by 10 cleft teams in five countries: Denmark, Finland, Norway, Sweden, and the UK. METHODS: Three different surgical protocols for primary palatal repair were tested against a common procedure in the total cohort of 448 children born with non-syndromic UCLP. Speech audio- and video-recordings of 391 children (136 girls and 255 boys) were available and transcribed phonetically. The main outcome measure was Percent Consonants Correct (PCC) from blinded assessments. RESULTS: In Trial 1, arm A showed statistically significant higher PCC scores (82%) than arm B (78%) (p = .045). No significant differences were found between prevalences in Trial 2, A: 79%, C: 82%; or Trial 3, A: 80%, D: 85%. Across all trials, girls achieved better PCC scores, excluding s-errors, than boys (91.0% and 87.5%, respectively) (p = .01). CONCLUSIONS: PCC scores were higher in arm A than B in Trial 1, whereas no differences were found between arms in Trials 2 or 3. The burden of care in terms of secondary pharyngeal surgeries, number of fistulae, and speech therapy visits differed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN29932826.


Subject(s)
Cleft Lip/surgery , Cleft Palate/surgery , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Speech Disorders/therapy , Speech Therapy/methods , Articulation Disorders/etiology , Articulation Disorders/therapy , Child, Preschool , Cleft Lip/diagnosis , Cleft Palate/diagnosis , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Infant , Internationality , Male , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Plastic Surgery Procedures/adverse effects , Recovery of Function , Speech Disorders/etiology , Speech Production Measurement , Statistics, Nonparametric , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
3.
J Craniofac Surg ; 20 Suppl 2: 1687-98, 2009 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19816334

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate surgical results, speech, hearing, and craniofacial morphology after primary cleft repair performed from 1973 to 1979. METHODS: During the years 1972 to 1985, all primary cleft surgeries were performed by 1 plastic surgeon, using Tennison lip closure combined with a periosteoplasty on the clefted alveolus at age 3 months. By mobilizing mucoperiosteal flaps, bony bridges were induced in the alveolar process in approximately 60% of the cases. All patients had the soft palate closed at age 24 months by a pushback technique. All children with complete unilateral clefts without soft tissue bands (unilateral cleft lip and palate) primary operated on 1973 to 1979 were included in the material, except 3 patients with a syndrome and 2 patients of foreign ethnicity. The material involved 30 consecutive patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (20 boys and 10 girls; 16 left-sided and 14 right-sided clefts) who were operated on. Standardized records including photos, radiographs, lateral cephalograms, plaster model, and recording of speech and hearing were collected according to the treatment protocol at age 6, 15, and approximately 25 years. RESULTS: Evaluation included craniofacial descriptive cephalometric analysis, dentoalveolar morphology, dentofacial aesthetics, speech concerning articulation and nasality, and hearing status. Number of surgical interventions after primary surgery was recorded. Secondary revisions and candidates for orthognathic surgery are reported. Ten consecutive patients (case nos. 11-20) are demonstrated as clinical reports. CONCLUSIONS: : This longitudinal study shows how a multidisciplinary evaluation adequate for intercenter comparison can be performed when standardized procedures, registrations, and documentations are available.


Subject(s)
Cleft Lip/therapy , Cleft Palate/therapy , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Patient Care Team , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Combined Modality Therapy , Female , Humans , Infant , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Orthodontics , Otolaryngology , Speech-Language Pathology , Surgery, Plastic , White People
4.
Child Neuropsychol ; 11(2): 121-33, 2005 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16036440

ABSTRACT

The present study investigated auditory attention skills in a sample of children with non-chronic otitis media with effusion (OME). Twenty children with repeated episodes of OME but not found in the need for myringotomy and insertion of ventilating tubes were compared to 20 control children with no known episodes of OME based on parental reports and medical records. Mean age during assessment was 9 years, and none of the children showed signs of impaired language functions and with normal general cognitive abilities. They were assessed with dichotic listening CV-syllables (DLCV-108) free recall and directed attention tasks. The control children showed the expected right ear advantage during free recall and the directed right condition, and demonstrated a shift toward a left ear advantage during the directed left. The children with a history of OME showed a predominant right ear advantage across all three tasks. Although some change in ear accuracy occurred across tasks, impaired auditory attention skills were found following a history of middle ear infections. These results replicate those reported earlier from a sample of children with persistent otitis media with effusion, and suggest that treatment with ventilating tubes does not appear to make any difference in the development of auditory attention skills, whereas occurrence of OME must be considered when testing auditory attentional skills as a part of a neuropsychological assessment.


Subject(s)
Attention , Hearing Disorders/etiology , Otitis Media/complications , Otitis Media/physiopathology , Child , Cohort Studies , Dichotic Listening Tests , Female , Hearing Disorders/diagnosis , Humans , Language Disorders/diagnosis , Language Disorders/etiology , Male , Mental Recall , Severity of Illness Index
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...