Liquid chromatographic-electrospray ionization-mass spectrometric analysis of cytochrome P450 metabolites of arachidonic acid.

Arachidonic acid (AA) can be metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes to many biologically active compounds including 5,6-, 8,9-, 11,12-, and 14,15-epoxyeicosatrienoic acids (EETs), their corresponding dihydroxyeicosatrienoic acids (DHETs), and 20-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid (20-HETE). These eicosanoids are potent regulators of vascular tone. We developed a liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry method to simultaneously determine 5,6-, 8,9-, 11,12-, and 14,15-EETs; 5,6-, 8,9-, 11,12-, and 14,15-DHETs; and 20-HETE. [2H8]EETs, [2H8]DHETs, and [2H2]20-HETE were used as internal standards. These compounds are readily separated on a C18 reverse-phase column using water:acetonitrile with 0.005% acetic acid as a mobile phase. The internal standards, [2H8]EETs, [2H8]DHETs, and [2H2]20-HETE, eluted slightly faster than the natural eicosanoids. The samples were ionized by electrospray with fragmentor voltage of 120 V and detected in a negative mode. The negative ion detection gave a lower background than the positive ion detection for these compounds. These eicosanoids exhibited high abundance of the ions corresponding to [M - 1]-. The m/z = 319, 337, and 319 ions were used for quantitation of EETs, DHETs, and 20-HETE, respectively. The detection limits using selected ion monitoring of these compounds are about 1 pg per injection. The position of functional groups and water content of mobile phase had a significant effect on the sensitivity of detection. Water content of 40% was found to give maximal sensitivity. The method was used to determine EETs, DHETs, and 20-HETE in bovine coronary artery endothelial cells, dog plasma, rat astrocytes, and rat kidney microsome samples.

Inverse agonist action of Leu-enkephalin at delta(2)-opioid receptors mediates spinal antianalgesia.

Dynorphin A(1-17) given intrathecally releases spinal cholecystokinin to produce an antianalgesic action against spinal morphine in the tail-flick test in CD-1 mice. The present study showed that following the cholecystokinin step, a delta(2)-opioid inverse agonist action of Leu-enkephalin (LE), was involved. Pretreatment with intrathecal LE antiserum eliminated dynorphin and cholecystokinin-8s antianalgesia. A small dose of LE intrathecally produced antianalgesia that like that from dynorphin A(1-17) and cholecystokinin was eliminated by naltriben but not 7-benzylidenenaltrexone (delta(2)- and delta(1)-opioid receptor antagonist, respectively). This LE step was followed by N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor activation. MK801, an NMDA receptor antagonist, eliminated the antianalgesia from dynorphin A(1-17), cholecystokinin-8s, and LE. Furthermore, none of the three were effective against morphine analgesia in 129S6/SvEv mice possibly because of their deficiency in NMDA receptor response. In 129S6/SvEv mice, [D-Ser(2)]-Leu-enkephalin-Thr analgesia was not attenuated by LE; thus, this delta(2)-analgesic agonist and LE inverse agonist action did not occur through competition at the same delta(2)-receptor in CD-1 mice. In CD-1 mice, a linear sequence of dynorphin A(1-17) --> cholecystokinin --> LE --> NMDA receptors was indicated: cholecystokinin antiserum inhibited cholecystokinin but not LE; naltriben inhibited LE but not NMDA. The uniqueness of LE in linking dynorphin A(1-17), cholecystokinin, delta(2)-opioid, and NMDA receptor activation may unify the separate known mechanisms involved in the antiopioid actions of these components against morphine.

Morphine tolerance in mice changes response of heroin from mu to delta opioid receptors.

Heroin produced antinociception in the tail flick test through mu receptors in the brain of ICR and CD-1 mice, a response inhibited by 3-O-methylnaltrexone. Tolerance to morphine was produced by subcutaneous morphine pellet implantation. By the third day, the heroin response was produced through delta opioid receptors. The response was inhibited by simultaneous intracerebroventricular (i.c. v.) administration of naltrindole, a delta opioid receptor antagonist. More specifically, delta1 rather than delta2 receptors were involved because 7-benzylidenenaltrexone, a delta1 receptor antagonist, inhibited but naltriben, a delta2 antagonist, did not. Also, antinociception produced by i.c.v. heroin was inhibited by intrathecal administration of bicuculline and picrotoxin consistent with the concept that delta1 receptors in the brain mediated the antinociceptive response through descending neuronal pathways to the spinal cord to activate GABAA and GABAB receptors rather than spinal alpha2-adrenergic and serotonergic receptors activated originally by the mu agonist action in naive mice. The mu response of 6-monoacetylmorphine, a metabolite of heroin, was changed by morphine pellet implantation to a delta2 response (inhibited by naltriben but not 7-benzylidenenaltrexone). The agonist action of morphine in these morphine-tolerant mice remained mu. Thus, the opioid receptor selectivity of heroin and 6-monoacetylmorphine in the brain is changed by production of tolerance to morphine. Such a change explains how morphine tolerant mice are not cross-tolerant to heroin.

Supraspinal neurotensin-induced antianalgesia in mice is mediated by spinal cholecystokinin.

Intracerebral injection of neurotensin into specific brain loci in rats produces hyperalgesia due to the release of cholecystokinin (CCK) in the spinal cord. The present purpose was to show in another species that neurotensin can antagonize the antinociceptive action of morphine through the spinal CCK mechanism in mice. Neurotensin given intracerebroventricularly (i.c.v.) at doses higher than 100 ng produced antinociception in the tail flick test. However, at lower doses between 1 pg to 25 ng, neurotensin antagonized the antinociceptive action of morphine given intrathecally (i.t.), thus demonstrating the antianalgesic activity of neurotensin. The rightward shift in the morphine dose-response curve produced by i.c.v. neurotensin was eliminated by an i.t. pretreatment with CCK8 antibody (5 microl of antiserum solution diluted 1:1000). I.t. administration of lorglumide, a CCK(A)-receptor antagonist (10-1000 ng), and PD135,158, a CCK(B)-receptor antagonist (250-500 ng), also eliminated the antianalgesic action of neurotensin. Thus, the mechanism of the antianalgesic action of neurotensin given i.c.v. involved spinal CCK. This mode of action is similar to that for the antianalgesic action of supraspinal pentobarbital which also involves spinal CCK.

Antianalgesic action of dynorphin A mediated by spinal cholecystokinin.

Previous work indicates that the antianalgesic action of pentobarbital and neurotensin administered intracerebroventricularly in mice arises from activation of a descending system to release cholecystokinin (CCK) in the spinal cord where CCK is known to antagonize morphine analgesia. Spinal dynorphin, like CCK, has an antianalgesic action against intrathecally administered morphine. This dynorphin action is indirect; even though it is initiated in the spinal cord, it requires the involvement of an ascending pathway to the brain and a descending pathway to the spinal cord where an antianalgesic mediator works. The aim of the present investigation was to determine if the antianalgesic action of intrathecal dynorphin A involved spinal CCK. All drugs were administered intrathecally to mice in the tail flick test. Morphine analgesia was inhibited by dynorphin as shown by a rightward shift of the morphine dose-response curve. The effect of dynorphin was eliminated by administration of the CCK receptor antagonists lorglumide and PD135 158. One hour pretreatment with CCK antiserum also eliminated the action of dynorphin. On the other hand, the antianalgesic action of CCK was not affected by dynorphin antiserum. Thus, CCK did not release dynorphin. Both CCK and dynorphin were antianalgesic against DSLET but not DPDPE, delta 2 and delta 1 opioid receptor peptide agonists, respectively. The results suggest that the antianalgesic action of dynorphin occurred through an indirect mechanism ultimately dependent on the action of spinal CCK.

Heroin acts on delta opioid receptors in the brain of streptozocin-induced diabetic rats.

Heroin, like morphine, given intracerebroventricularly produces analgesia by acting on mu opioid receptors in most mice. In contrast, in Swiss Webster mice, heroin has the unusual property of acting on brain delta opioid receptors whereas morphine still acts on mu receptors. The literature indicates that in diabetic mice and rats, the mu agonist potency of morphine is diminished while that to a delta receptor agonist is enhanced. The purpose of the present study was to determine if the response to heroin occurred through a delta receptor in the brain of streptozotocin-induced diabetic Sprague-Dawley rats. One week after a cannula was surgically implanted in the lateral ventricle, diabetes was induced by intravenous administration of 55 mg/kg of streptozotocin. Three days later the receptor selectivity of intraventricular heroin in the tail flick test was determined by coadministration of opioid antagonists. In nondiabetic rats, a rightward shift in the dose response curve for heroin was produced by naloxone. D-Phe-Cys-Tyr-D-Trp-Orn-Thr-Pen-ThrNH2, a more mu receptor selective antagonist given in a single dose experiment, also inhibited heroin action. Thus, heroin acted on mu receptors. In diabetic rats, intracerebroventricular naltrindole, but not naloxone nor CTOP, inhibited the heroin response and indicated a delta agonist action for heroin. Inhibition by intrathecal yohimbine of the mu (nondiabetic) and bicuculline of the delta response (diabetic) suggested spinal alpha2-adrenergic and GABA(A) receptor mediation, respectively, for the descending systems. In conclusion, the response to heroin was changed from mu in nondiabetic rats to a delta receptor action in diabetic rats. Understanding the basis for this change in receptor selectivity of heroin could provide an important avenue for investigating determinants of opioid receptor function.

Supraspinal flumazenil inhibits the antianalgesic action of spinal dynorphin A (1-17).

DynorphinA (Dyn) administered intrathecally or released spinally in mice produces antianalgesia, that is, antagonizes morphine analgesia (tail-flick test). Spinal transection eliminates this Dyn antianalgesia. Present results in mice show that intracerebroventricular administration of flumazenil, a benzodiazepine receptor antagonist, also eliminated the antianalgesic action of Dyn; flumazenil in the brain eliminated the suppressant effect of intrathecal Dyn on intrathecal and intracerebroventricular morphine-induced antinociception. Intracerebroventricular clonidine, naloxone, and norbinaltorphimine release spinal Dyn. The latent antinociceptive actions of these compounds were uncovered by intracerebroventricular flumazenil. Thus, Dyn, given intrathecally or released spinally, activates a pathway that is inhibited by intracerebroventricular flumazenil. Dyn antianalgesia is not significantly altered by intracerebroventricular administration of bicuculline and picrotoxin, suggesting that activation of the gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor has little if any involvement in the antianalgesic action of Dyn. The antagonistic effect of Dyn seems to be mimicked by benzodiazepine agonists. Furthermore, administration of a benzodiazepine receptor inverse agonist (methyl-6,7-dimethoxy-4-ethyl-beta-carboline-3-carboxylate) inhibited Dyn antianalgesia as did flumazenil. Thus, flumazenil, through a benzodiazepine antagonist or inverse agonist action, interrupts, as does spinal transection, the neuronal circuit (cord/brain/cord) necessary for the antianalgesic action of spinal Dyn. Because Dyn antianalgesia is an indirect action, activation of the neuronal circuit must lead to the release of a direct-acting antianalgesic mediator in the spinal cord.

Determination of delta-opioid in NG108-15 cells.

The delta-opioid receptors in mouse neuroblastoma x rat glioma NG108-15 cells were characterized by receptor binding and cAMP assays. Saturation binding assays using [3H][D-Pen5]enkephalin (DPDPE) or [3H][D-Ser2, Leu5, Thr6]enkephalin (DSLET) gave similar binding capacities (Bmax). Competition binding assays showed that DPDPE and DSLET have similar affinity for the [3H]DPDPE or 3[H]DSLET binding sites. The rank order of potency of competition with [3H]DPDPE and [3H]DSLET was similar: naltriben approximately DSLET > or = DPDPE > 7-benzylidenenaltrexone (BNTX). Both DPDPE and DSLET were found to decrease cAMP formation. The action of DSLET was antagonized by naltriben but not BNTX, while the action of DPDPE was reversed by both antagonists. Therefore, the delta-opioid receptor in NG108-15 cells has similar affinity for the agonists DPDPE and DSLET, and a higher affinity for the antagonist naltriben than BNTX.

Cold water swim stress- and delta-2 opioid-induced analgesia are modulated by spinal gamma-aminobutyric acidA receptors.

Cold water swim stress for 3 min at 5 degrees C produces antinociception in the tail-flick test in mice by activation of delta opioid receptors in the brain. Also, the inhibition of the tail-flick reflex produced by i.c.v. administration of delta opioid receptor agonists is known to be mediated by spinal gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptors. The purpose of this investigation was to determine if the cold water swim stress-induced antinociceptive response is mediated by GABA receptors in the spinal cord. First, i.c.v. administration of the delta-2 receptor antagonist, naltriben, but not the delta-1 receptor antagonist, 7-benzylidenenaltrexone, antagonized the cold water swim stress-induced antinociception in ICR mice and confirmed the role of delta-2 receptors in this response. Next, the involvement of spinal GABAA receptors was shown through intrathecal administration of GABAA receptor antagonists, picrotoxin and bicuculline, which inhibited the cold water swim stress-induced antinociceptive response. Thus, the antinociception produced through activation of the delta-2 receptor in the brain by cold water swim stress involved a descending pathway mediated by spinal GABAA receptors. This descending pathway appeared to be the same as that activated by i.c.v. administration of delta-2 opioid agonists in the brain.

[D-Pen2-D-Pen5]enkephalin, a delta opioid agonist, given intracerebroventricularly in the mouse produces antinociception through medication of spinal GABA receptors.

Intracerebroventricular (ICV) administration of [D-Pen2-D-Pen5]enkephalin (DPDPE), a delta opioid receptor agonist, activates a descending antinociceptive pathway that inhibits the tail-flick response in mice. Involvement of spinal GABA receptors in this response was studied by giving GABA antagonist intrathecally. First, antinociception produced by intrathecally administered isoguvacine, a GABAA agonist, was inhibited by intrathecal bicuculline (GABA receptor antagonist) or picrotoxin (chloride channel antagonist). Then, antinociception induced by ICV DPDPE was antagonized by intrathecal picrotoxin and bicuculline in a dose-and time-dependent manner. Second, intrathecal administration of 2-hydroxysaclofen, a GABAB antagonist (which inhibited antinociception induced by a GABAB agonist, baclofen, given IT), produced a shift of the dose-response curve for ICV DPDPE to the right. GABAA agonist, baclofen, given IT), produced a shift of the dose-response curve for ICV DPDPE to the right. GABAA and B antagonists given together intrathecally produced a greater than additive antagonistic effect against ICV DPDPE-induced antinociception. Thus, the delta agonist action of DPDPE in the brain leads to activation of descending spinal pathways which involve mediation by spinal GABAA and GABAB receptors in the antinociceptive response.

Inhibiting a spinal dynorphin A component enhances intrathecal morphine antinociception in mice.

Morphine given intracerebroventricularly releases spinal dynorphin A (Dyn) in mice. The present study was undertaken to determine whether morphine given intrathecally (IT) released Dyn. We demonstrated that the antinociceptive action of morphine was enhanced by procedures that are known to attenuate Dyn action. First, coadministration of the opiate antagonists, naloxone (5 fg), norbinaltorphimine (5 fg) or beta-funaltrexamine (0.25 ng) with IT morphine (0.15 microgram, 5 min) increased antinociceptive percentage maximum possible effect (%MPE) from 30% to 65%. Second, dynorphin antiserum (5 micrograms, 1 h, IT), which neutralizes Dyn action, enhanced morphine (0.2 microgram, 5 min, IT) action; MPE of 27% was increased to 60%. Third, production of desensitization to the antagonistic action of Dyn, IT, by pretreatment with morphine [10 mg/kg, 3 h, subcutaneously (SC)], or 2 micrograms, 3 h, IT) or Dyn (1 ng, 1 h, IT) increased the 30% MPE of IT morphine to 60%. Naloxone [1 ng/kg, intraperitoneally (IP)] enhanced IT morphine at a peak time of 20 min. Nalmefene [1 to 100 ng/kg, per os (PO)] enhanced IT morphine action. In conclusion, the present study showed that IT morphine putatively released spinal Dyn.

Opioid antagonists: indirect antagonism of morphine analgesia by spinal dynorphin A.

Naloxone and norbinaltorphimine when given ICV to mice can antagonize IT morphine-induced analgesia indirectly by releasing spinal dynorphin A(1-17) (Dyn A). Dyn A produces an antianalgesic action against IT morphine. In the present study, drugs with varying amounts of opioid antagonist to agonist action (nalbuphine, levallorphan, naltrexone, and naltrindole) were given ICV to determine whether they antagonized IT morphine-induced inhibition of the tail-flick response as an indication of spinal Dyn A release. Additional pharmacological tests were used as criteria for Dyn A release: a) Small doses of the opioid antagonists naloxone and norbinaltorphimine administered IT inhibited the antagonistic action; b) dynorphin antiserum given IT blocked the action of Dyn A; c) desensitization to the effect of Dyn A was produced by 3-h pretreatment with morphine, 10 mg/kg SC, or by pretreatment with the agents themselves. When given ICV, nalbuphine, levallorphan, and naltrexone released Dyn A in the spinal cord to produce an antianalgesic effect. Naltrindole, a delta-receptor antagonist, did not release Dyn A. Dyn A release did not appear to involve delta-receptors. Thus, a number of opioid antagonists inhibit the analgesic action of opioid agonists indirectly through Dyn A release.

Naloxone and norbinaltorphimine administered intracerebroventricularly antagonize spinal morphine-induced antinociception in mice through the antianalgesic action of spinal dynorphin A (1-17).

Previously, a number of analgesic agonists, when administered i.c.v. to mice, were shown putatively to activate the release of dynorphin A (1-17) (Dyn A) in the spinal cord. Whether released endogenously or administered i.t., Dyn A produces an antianalgesic action against i.t. administered morphine. In the present study, the opioid antagonists, naloxone and norbinaltorphimine (N-BNI), were shown to activate the Dyn A system. Intracerebro-ventricular administration of both naloxone and N-BNI antagonized the antinociceptive effect of i.t. morphine in the mouse tail-flick test, an effect designated as an antianalgesic action. This antianalgesic action was demonstrated to be mediated by spinal Dyn A in the following ways: 1) the antagonistic effect of i.c.v. naloxone and N-BNI was eliminated by administration of small doses of i.t. naloxone and N-BNI, a unique situation where administration of the opioid antagonists at a second (i.t.) site reversed the antagonistic effect of opioid antagonists administered at the other (i.c.v.) site; 2) i.t. pretreatment with dynorphin antiserum prevented the antianalgesic effect; 3) morphine pretreatment (s.c., 10 mg/kg), which produces desensitization to the effect of spinal Dyn A, eliminated the antianalgesic effect; and 4) pretreatment with i.c.v. naloxone (3 hours) and N-BNI (24 hours) which presumably releases Dyn A produced desensitization to the antagonistic effect of i.c.v. naloxone and N-BNI as well as to the antianalgesic action of i.t. Dyn A. Taken together, the results indicate that both i.c.v. naloxone and N-BNI produced indirect antagonistic actions which were mediated at the spinal cord by the antianalgesic action of Dyn A.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Differential contribution of descending serotonergic and noradrenergic systems to central Tyr-D-Ala2-Gly-NMePhe4-Gly-ol5 (DAMGO) and morphine-induced antinociception in mice.

Differences in antinociceptive (inhibition of tail-flick response) action of morphine and Tyr-D-Ala2-Gly-NMePhe4-ol5 (DAMGO) were demonstrated by intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) administration of these agonists along with intrathecal (i.t.) administration of a variety of antagonists: yohimbine, methysergide, naloxone and nor-binaltorphimine. Intracerebroventricular morphine analgesia was antagonized by either i.t. yohimbine or methysergide, whereas i.c.v. DAMGO analgesia was only antagonized by i.t. methysergide. Thus, for i.c.v. morphine-induced analgesia, descending spinal noradrenergic and serotonergic systems were involved, whereas for DAMGO analgesia, only the serotonergic system was involved. The dose-response curve for i.c.v. morphine reached a plateau at high doses, whereas i.c.v. DAMGO analgesia peaked at 10 ng and then decreased thereafter, producing a bell-shaped dose-response curve. This decrement in analgesic response could be reversed by low doses of i.t. methysergide and i.t. pindolol. It was concluded that activation of serotonin-1 (5-HT1) receptors plays a role in the decrease in analgesia from high doses of DAMGO. Combinations of i.t. morphine with i.t. 5-HT or i.t. clonidine produced additive or greater analgesic responses. Combinations of i.t. DAMGO with i.t. 5-HT or i.t. clonidine produced less than additive interactions. Part of the latter responses appeared to be due to activation of 5-HT1 receptors; blockade of these receptors by pindolol enhanced i.t. DAMGO-induced analgesia. Morphine and DAMGO differ further because i.c.v. morphine activated a descending antianalgesic pathway mediated by spinal dynorphin A(1-17), whereas i.c.v. DAMGO at a high dose did not. Thus, morphine and DAMGO differ in their modes of antinociceptive action as measured by the tail-flick response.