The Impact of Caregiver Depression on Child Asthma Outcomes: Pathways and Mechanisms.

BACKGROUND: Depression is common in caregivers of children with asthma and is associated with poor outcomes in their child. No prior studies have longitudinally examined caregiver depression remission as a predictor of improvement in child asthma control. OBJECTIVE: This 2-site study examined whether the proportion of time a caregiver was in depression remission predicted subsequent child asthma control at exit. METHOD: Caregivers (n = 205) with current major depressive disorder and their children, ages 7 to 17, with persistent asthma were observed every 4 weeks for 52 weeks. Caregiver depressive symptoms were measured using the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD). Child asthma was assessed with the (Childhood) Asthma Control Test (cACT/ACT) and spirometry, and depression with the Children's Depression Inventory (CDI). Linear regression analyses were conducted with change in cACT/ACT, CDI, and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1)% predicted as outcomes and proportion of time the caregiver was in remission (HRSD score ≤ 7) as the predictor. Multilevel mediation analyses examined the role of child depressive symptoms and asthma controller medication adherence. RESULTS: Children were, on average, 54.1% female and 11 years old. Caregiver proportion of time in HRSD-assessed remission of depression was a significant predictor of improvement in cACT/ACT, CDI, and FEV1% predicted. Child CDI score, but not medication adherence, mediated the relationship between caregiver HRSD scores and child asthma control scores. CONCLUSIONS: Improvement in caregiver depression positively influences child asthma outcomes partially through improvement in child depressive symptom severity. Caregiver depression screening and treatment might lead to improvement in child asthma outcomes.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled proof-of-concept study of ondansetron for bipolar and related disorders and alcohol use disorder.

Bipolar disorder is associated with high rates of alcohol use disorder. However, little is known about the treatment of this dual diagnosis population. Previous studies suggest that ondansetron decreases alcohol use, particularly in people with specific single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) alleles. A 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ondansetron was conducted in 70 outpatients with bipolar spectrum disorders and early onset alcohol use disorder. Outcome measures included alcohol use, assessed with the Timeline Followback method, Penn Alcohol Craving Scale (PACS), Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD), Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self-report, and Young Mania Rating Scale. SNPs rs1042173, rs1176713 and rs1150226 were explored as predictors of response. Participants had a mean age of 44.9 ± 9.4 years, were mostly men (60.0%), and African American (51.4%). Mean ondansetron exit dose was 3.23 ± 2.64 mg. No significant between-group differences in alcohol use measures were observed. However, a significant reduction in HRSD scores was observed (p = 0.045). Inclusion of SNPs increased effect sizes for some alcohol-related outcomes and the HRSD. Ondansetron was well tolerated. This proof-of-concept study is the first report on ondansetron in bipolar people with bipolar disorders and alcohol use disorder. Alcohol use did not demonstrate a significant between-group difference. However, the findings suggest that ondansetron may be associated with reduction in depressive symptom severity in persons with bipolar illnesses and alcohol use disorder. A larger trial is needed to examine the effects of ondansetron on bipolar depression.

A randomized trial of an NMDA receptor antagonist for reversing corticosteroid effects on the human hippocampus.

Preclinical and clinical research indicates that excess corticosteroid is associated with adverse effects on the hippocampus. Animal model data suggest that N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists may block corticosteroid effect on the hippocampus. This translational clinical trial investigated the effect of memantine vs. placebo on hippocampal subfield volume in humans receiving chronic corticosteroid therapy. Men and women (N = 46) receiving chronic prescription corticosteroid therapy were randomized to memantine or placebo in a double-blind, crossover design (two 24-week treatment periods, separated by a 4-week washout) for 52 weeks. Structural magnetic resonance imaging was obtained at baseline and after each treatment. Data were analyzed using repeated measures analysis of variance. Mean corticosteroid dose was 7.69 ± 6.41 mg/day and mean duration 4.90 ± 5.61 years. Controlling for baseline volumes, the left DG/CA3 region was significantly larger following memantine than placebo (p = .011). The findings suggest that an NMDA receptor antagonist attenuates corticosteroid effect in the same hippocampal subfields in humans as in animal models. This finding has both mechanistic and clinical implications. Attenuation of the effect of corticosteroids on the human DG/CA3 region implicates the NMDA receptor in human hippocampal volume losses with corticosteroids. In addition, by suggesting a drug class that may, at least in part, block the effects of corticosteroids on the human DG/CA3 subfield, these results may have clinical relevance for people receiving prescription corticosteroids, as well as to those with cortisol elevations due to medical or psychiatric conditions.

A pilot study of brexpiprazole for bipolar depression.

BACKGROUND: Past studies suggest that brexpiprazole is an effective adjunctive treatment for major depressive disorder and schizophrenia; however, no studies have examined brexpiprazole for bipolar depression. In this study, we examined the effects of brexpiprazole on mood, cognition, and quality of life in outpatients with bipolar depression. METHODS: Twenty-one adults with bipolar disorder (most recent episode depressed) and scoring at least a 25 on the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) were recruited. Brexpiprazole was titrated up to 4 mg/day over the 8-week period. Depressive symptoms were measured using MADRS and Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-report (IDS-SR30). Manic symptoms were measured using Young Mania Rating Scale, quality of life with the Quality of Life in Bipolar Disorder (QOLBD), and cognition with Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, Stroop Color Word Test, and Trail Making Test. RESULTS: MADRS and IDS-SR30 scores decreased from baseline at weeks 4 and 8. YMRS and cognitive scores did not change significantly. QOLBD scores increased from baseline to week 8. LIMITATIONS: A limitation to this study is the open-label design. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the effects of brexpiprazole on bipolar depression. We found a significant reduction in depressive symptoms and an increase in quality of life.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of lamotrigine for prescription corticosteroid effects on the human hippocampus.

In animals, stress and corticosteroid excess are associated with decreases in memory performance and hippocampal volume that may be prevented with agents that decrease glutamate release. Humans also demonstrate changes in memory and hippocampus with corticosteroids. In this report the effects of glutamate-release inhibitor lamotrigine on hippocampal structure and memory were examined in people receiving medically needed prescription corticosteroid therapy. A total of 54 outpatient adults (n = 28 women) receiving chronic (≥ 6 months) oral corticosteroid therapy were randomized to lamotrigine or placebo for 48 weeks. Declarative memory was assessed using the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT); structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as well as single-voxel proton MR spectroscopy (1HMRS) focused on hippocampus were obtained at baseline and week 48. Utilizing a mixed-model approach, structural and biochemical data were examined by separate ANOVAs, and memory was assessed with a multi-level longitudinal model. RAVLT total scores demonstrated significantly better declarative memory performance with lamotrigine than placebo (p = 0.047). Hippocampal subfield volumes were not significantly different between the treatment groups. In summary, lamotrigine was associated with less decline in declarative memory performance than placebo in corticosteroid-treated patients. Findings suggest that, in humans as well as in animal models, glutamate release inhibitors may attenuate some of the effects on the human memory associated with corticosteroids.

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Citicoline in Patients with Alcohol Use Disorder.

BACKGROUND: Alcohol use disorder is a major societal and individual burden that exacerbates health outcomes, decreases quality of life, and negatively affects U.S. healthcare spending. Although pharmacological treatments are available for alcohol use disorder, many of them are limited by small effect sizes and used infrequently. Citicoline is a widely available over-the-counter supplement with a favorable side effect profile. It acts through cholinergic pathways and phospholipid metabolism. The current report examines the effect of oral citicoline on alcohol use, craving, depressive symptoms, and cognitive outcomes in individuals with alcohol use disorder. METHODS: A 12-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, pilot study of citicoline (titrated to 2,000 mg/d) in 62 adults (age 18 to 75) with alcohol use disorder was conducted. Alcohol use, such as number of drinking days, amount used, and number of heavy drinking days, was assessed using the Timeline Followback method and liver enzymes, while alcohol craving was measured using the Penn Alcohol Craving Scale. A neurocognitive battery (e.g., Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test) and depressive symptoms scale (e.g., Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report) scores were also collected. Data were analyzed using a random regression analysis. RESULTS: The primary outcome analysis was conducted in the intent-to-treat sample and consisted of 55 participants (78.2% men and 21.8% women, mean age of 46.47 ± 9.15 years). In the assessment period, the drinking days, on average, represented 77% of the assessed days. Significant between-group differences were not observed on alcohol use, craving, and cognitive or depressive symptom measures. Citicoline was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: This proof-of-concept study observed that citicoline was well tolerated, but was not associated with a reduction in alcohol use or other outcomes, as compared to placebo. The favorable effects reported with citicoline for cocaine use, cognitive disorders, and other conditions do not appear to extend to alcohol use disorder.

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Escitalopram in Patients with Asthma and Major Depressive Disorder.

BACKGROUND: Depression is common in asthma and is associated with poor outcomes. However, antidepressant therapy in depressed patients with asthma has been the topic of little research. OBJECTIVE: This study examined the impact of antidepressant treatment with escitalopram versus placebo on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD), Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Report (IDS-SR), Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ), and oral corticosteroid use in patients with asthma and major depressive disorder (MDD). METHODS: Single-site 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial of escitalopram (10 mg/d) was conducted in 139 outpatients with asthma and MDD. Randomization was stratified by oral corticosteroid use (≥3 bursts in past 12 months, yes or no) and baseline depressive symptom severity (HRSD score ≥ 20) (higher severity, n = 42) versus less than 3 bursts, HRSD score less than 20, or both (lower severity, n = 97). The primary data analysis was conducted using hierarchical linear modeling Version 7.01 on the higher and lower severity samples and post hoc was conducted on the combined sample. RESULTS: Among the higher severity completers (n = 21), a significant reduction in the ACQ score (P = .04) and oral corticosteroid use (P = .04) was observed with escitalopram. In the combined sample, no significant differences were observed, but a trend toward greater reduction in the IDS-SR score was observed with escitalopram (P = .07). Side effects were comparable across groups. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that patients with more severe asthma and depression symptomatology may have a positive response, in terms of both asthma and depressive symptom reduction, to antidepressant treatment.

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Citicoline for Cocaine Dependence in Bipolar I Disorder.

OBJECTIVE: Although drug dependence is common in patients with bipolar disorder, minimal data are available on the treatment of drug dependence in this patient population. The authors previously reported a decreased risk of relapse to cocaine use in a pilot study of citicoline in patients with bipolar disorder and cocaine dependence. The primary aim of the present study was to determine whether citicoline reduces cocaine use in outpatients with bipolar I disorder and current cocaine dependence and active cocaine use. METHOD: A total of 130 outpatients with bipolar I disorder (depressed or mixed mood state) and cocaine dependence received citicoline or placebo add-on therapy for 12 weeks. Results of thrice-weekly urine drug screens were analyzed using a generalized linear mixed model that was fitted to the binary outcome of cocaine-positive screens at each measurement occasion for 12 weeks. Mood was assessed with the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Report, the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, and the Young Mania Rating Scale. RESULTS: In the intent-to-treat sample (N=61 in both groups), significant treatment group and group-by-time effects were observed, whether or not missing urine screens were imputed as cocaine positive. The group effect was greatest early in the study and tended to decline with time. No between-group differences in mood symptoms or side effects were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Citicoline was well tolerated for treatment of cocaine dependence in patients with bipolar disorder. Cocaine use was significantly reduced with citicoline initially, although treatment effects diminished over time, suggesting the need for augmentation strategies to optimize long-term benefit.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of quetiapine in patients with bipolar disorder, mixed or depressed phase, and alcohol dependence.

BACKGROUND: Alcohol dependence is common in bipolar disorder (BPD) and associated with treatment nonadherence, violence, and hospitalization. Quetiapine is a standard treatment for BPD. We previously reported improvement in depressive symptoms, but not alcohol use, with quetiapine in BPD and alcohol dependence. However, mean alcohol use was low and a larger effect size on alcohol-related measures was observed in those with higher levels of alcohol consumption. In this study, efficacy of quetiapine in patients with BPD and alcohol dependence was examined in patients with higher mean baseline alcohol use than in the prior study. METHODS: Ninety outpatients with bipolar I or II disorders, depressed or mixed mood state, and current alcohol dependence were randomized to 12 weeks of sustained release quetiapine (to 600 mg/d) add-on therapy or placebo. Drinking was quantified using the Timeline Follow Back method. Additional assessment tools included the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self-Report, Young Mania Rating Scale, Penn Alcohol Craving Scale, liver enzymes, and side effects. Alcohol use and mood were analyzed using a declining-effects random-regression model. RESULTS: Baseline and demographic characteristics in the 2 groups were similar. No significant between-group differences were observed on the primary outcome measure of drinks per day or other alcohol-related or mood measures (p > 0.05). Overall side effect burden, glucose, and cholesterol were similar in the 2 groups. However, a significant weight increase was observed with quetiapine at week 6 (+2.9 lbs [SE 1.4] quetiapine vs. -2.0 lbs [SE 1.4], p = 0.03), but not at week 12. Scores on the Barnes Akathisia Scale increased significantly more (p = 0.04) with quetiapine (+0.40 [SE 0.3]) than placebo (-0.52 [SE 0.3]) at week 6 but not week 12. Retention (survival) in the study was similar in the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that quetiapine does not reduce alcohol consumption in patients with BPD and alcohol dependence.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of pregnenolone for bipolar depression.

Depression in bipolar disorder (BPD) is challenging to treat. Therefore, additional medication options are needed. In the current report, the effect of the neurosteroid pregnenolone on depressive symptoms in BPD was examined. Adults (n=80) with BPD, depressed mood state, were randomized to pregnenolone (titrated to 500 mg/day) or placebo, as add-on therapy, for 12 weeks. Outcome measures included the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD), Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self-Report (IDS-SR), Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HRSA), and Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS). Serum neurosteroid levels were assessed at baseline and week 12. Data were analyzed using a mixed model ANCOVA with a between factor of treatment assignment, a within factor (repeated) of visit, and the baseline value, as well as age and gender, as covariates. In participants with at least one postbaseline visit (n=73), a significant treatment by week interaction for the HRSD (F(5,288)=2.61, p=0.025), but not IDS-SR, was observed. Depression remission rates were greater in the pregnenolone group (61%) compared with the placebo group (37%), as assessed by the IDS-SR (χ(2)(1)=3.99, p=0.046), but not the HRSD. Large baseline-to-exit changes in neurosteroid levels were observed in the pregnenolone group but not in the placebo group. In the pregnenolone group, baseline-to-exit change in the HRSA correlated negatively with changes in allopregnanolone (r(22)=-0.43, p=0.036) and pregNANolone (r(22)=-0.48, p=0.019) levels. Pregnenolone was well tolerated. The results suggest that pregnenolone may improve depressive symptoms in patients with BPD and can be safely administered.