PfMDR1: mechanisms of transport modulation by functional polymorphisms.

ATP-Binding Cassette (ABC) transporters are efflux pumps frequently associated with multidrug resistance in many biological systems, including malaria. Antimalarial drug-resistance involves an ABC transporter, PfMDR1, a homologue of P-glycoprotein in humans. Twenty years of research have shown that several single nucleotide polymorphisms in pfmdr1 modulate in vivo and/or in vitro drug susceptibility. The underlying physiological mechanism of the effect of these mutations remains unclear. Here we develop structural models for PfMDR1 in different predicted conformations, enabling the study of transporter motion. Such analysis of functional polymorphisms allows determination of their potential role in transport and resistance. The bacterial MsbA ABC pump is a PfMDR1 homologue. MsbA crystals in different conformations were used to create PfMDR1 models with Modeller software. Sequences were aligned with ClustalW and analysed by Ali2D revealing a high level of secondary structure conservation. To validate a potential drug binding pocket we performed antimalarial docking simulations. Using aminoquinoline as probe drugs in PfMDR1 mutated parasites we evaluated the physiology underlying the mechanisms of resistance mediated by PfMDR1 polymorphisms. We focused on the analysis of well known functional polymorphisms in PfMDR1 amino acid residues 86, 184, 1034, 1042 and 1246. Our structural analysis suggested the existence of two different biophysical mechanisms of PfMDR1 drug resistance modulation. Polymorphisms in residues 86/184/1246 act by internal allosteric modulation and residues 1034 and 1042 interact directly in a drug pocket. Parasites containing mutated PfMDR1 variants had a significant altered aminoquinoline susceptibility that appears to be dependent on the aminoquinoline lipophobicity characteristics as well as vacuolar efflux by PfCRT. We previously described the in vivo selection of PfMDR1 polymorphisms under antimalarial drug pressure. Now, together with recent PfMDR1 functional reports, we contribute to the understanding of the specific structural role of these polymorphisms in parasite antimalarial drug response.

Selection of pfmdr1 mutations after amodiaquine monotherapy and amodiaquine plus artemisinin combination therapy in East Africa.

Despite the pharmacodynamic advantages with artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) and some potentially opposite molecular mechanisms of tolerance to amodiaquine (AQ)/desethylamodiaquine (DEAQ) and artesunate (ART), there is a risk for rapid decay in efficacy if the two drugs are unable to ensure mutual prevention against a selection and spread of drug-resistant parasites. We have studied if mutations in the pfcrt and pfmdr1 genes selected in recurrent infections after AQ monotherapy are also selected after AQ plus ART combination therapy. Samples for molecular analysis were derived from three clinical trials on children<5 years old with uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria; one AQ monotherapy study conducted in Kenya 2003 and two AQ plus ART combination therapy studies conducted in Zanzibar 2002-2003 and 2005, respectively. The PCR-adjusted treatment failure rates in the three studies were 19%, 8% and 9%, respectively. After monotherapy there was a significant selection of pfcrt 76T in re-infections (OR not calculable; p=0.048) and of pfmdr1 86Y in recrudescent infections (OR 8.0; p=0.048). No such selection was found after combination therapy. A selection of pfmdr1 1246Y and the pfmdr1 haplotype (a.a 86, 184, 1246) YYY was found in recrudescent infections both after monotherapy (OR 7.6; p=0.009 and OR 3.1; p=0.029) and combination therapy in 2005 (OR 3.6; p=0.017 and OR 5.4; p<0.001). Hence, pfmdr1 1246Y with synergistic or compensatory addition of pfmdr1 86Y and 184Y appears to be involved in AQ/DEAQ resistance and treatment failure. Our results suggest that ART may protect against a selection of these SNPs initially, but maybe not after continuous drug pressure in a population. However, treatment failure rate and spread of pfmdr1 SNPs may remain at a low level because of the suggested opposite selection by ART and the pharmacodynamic advantages with ACT.

Short report: polymorphisms in the pfcrt and pfmdr1 genes of Plasmodium falciparum and in vitro susceptibility to amodiaquine and desethylamodiaquine.

The potential role of polymorphisms in the pfcrt and pfmdr1 genes and in vitro susceptibility to amodiaquine and desethylamodiaquine were explored in 15 chloroquine-resistant Colombian Plasmodium falciparum isolates. Single nucleotide polymorphisms in the pfcrt gene, including a newly reported mutation (S334N), were seen in isolates with decreased susceptibility to amodiaquine and desethylamodiaquine. The lowest susceptibility found to amodiaquine was observed in an isolate carrying a pfcrt and pfmdr1 Dd2-like haplotype, whereas a pfcrt haplotype related to the 7G8 Brazilian strain was found in a Colombian isolate with the lowest susceptibility to desethylamodiaquine. This exploratory study suggests that polymorphisms in the pfcrt and pfmdr1 genes play a role in amodiaquine and desethylamodiaquine resistance and warrants further study.

Amodiaquine resistance is not related to rare findings of pfmdr1 gene amplifications in Kenya.

OBJECTIVES: Many countries are now adopting artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) for treatment of Plasmodium falciparum malaria. In multi-drug resistant areas in South East Asia amplifications of the pfmdr1 gene are frequent and tentatively associated with reduced susceptibility to the common quinoline partner drugs mefloquine and lumefantrine. In Africa where amodiaquine is one of the favoured quinoline partner drugs in ACT, studies on multi-drug resistance associated pfmdr1 gene amplifications are urgent. Our aim was to determine the current prevalence of pfmdr1 gene amplifications and a possible association between pfmdr1 gene copy number and amodiaquine treatment outcome in Kenya. METHODS: Seventy-two children with Plasmodium falciparum infection in Kenya were treated with amodiaquine monotherapy and followed for 21 days. Possible amplification of the pfmdr1 gene was assessed from blood-spotted filterpaper by TaqMan probe based real-time polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: The recrudescent rate was 14 of 72 (19%). All children had single pfmdr1 copy infections, with the exception of one child who had an infection with two pfmdr1 copies. This child had an adequate treatment response. CONCLUSION: Pfmdr1 amplifications do exist in Kenya but at a very low frequency. Yet, the substantial number of children with recrudescent infections implies that amodiaquine resistance is not related to pfmdr1 gene amplifications in Kenya.

Amodiaquine resistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria in vivo is associated with selection of pfcrt 76T and pfmdr1 86Y.

The choice of partner drug is critical for artemisinine-based combination therapy (ACT) to remain effective and amodiaquine (AQ) is one important candidate to evaluate. We treated 81 children <5 years with uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria with AQ alone and related the treatment outcome to the possible selection of pfcrt 76T, 152T, 163S, 326S, pfmdr1 86Y and pfmrp 191H, 437S in recurrent infections (recrudescenses and re-infections) and to the blood concentration of desethylamodiaquine (DEAQ). During 21 days follow-up 28 children had a recurrent infection (9 recrudescenses, 13 re-infections and 6 mixed). Neither genotyping of the polymorphisms before treatment nor DEAQ blood concentrations could predict treatment outcome. pfcrt 76T was however significantly selected for in recurrent infections (p=0.020). pfmdr1 86Y was also selected for, but only in recrudescent infections (p=0.048). The study showed high prevalence of AQ resistant parasites in vivo, which appeared to be associated to pfcrt 76T and pfmdr1 86Y.