Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc ; 15(5): 547-54, 2007 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17225178

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of lateral retinacular release and medial and lateral retinacular deficiency on patellofemoral position and retropatellar contact pressure. Human knee specimens (n = 8, mean age = 65 SD 7 years, all male) were tested in a kinematic knee-simulating machine. During simulation of an isokinetic knee extension cycle from 120 degrees to full extension, a hydraulic cylinder applied sufficient force to the quadriceps tendon to produce an extension moment of 31 Nm. The position of the patella was measured using an ultrasound based motion analysis system (CMS 100, Zebris). The amount of patellofemoral contact pressure and its pressure distribution was measured using a pressure sensitive film (Tekscan, Boston). Patellar position and contact pressure were first investigated in intact knee conditions, after a lateral retinacular release and a release of the medial and lateral retinaculum. After lateral retinacular release the patella continuously moved from a significant medialised position at flexion (P = 0.01) to a lateralised position (P = 0.02) at full knee extension compared to intact conditions, the centre of patellofemoral contact pressure was significantly medialised (0.04) between 120 degrees and 60 degrees knee flexion. Patellofemoral contact pressure did not change significantly. In the deficient knee conditions the patella moved on a significant lateralised track (P = 0.04) through the entire extension cycle with a lateralised centre of patellofemoral pressure (P = 0.04) with a trend (P = 0.08) towards increased patellofemoral pressure. The results suggest that lateral retinacular release did not inevitably stabilise or medialise patellar tracking through the entire knee extension cycle, but could decrease pressure on the lateral patellar facet in knee flexion. Therefore lateral retinacular release should be considered carefully in cases of patellar instability.


Subject(s)
Femur/physiology , Knee Joint/physiology , Ligaments, Articular/surgery , Patella/physiology , Aged , Biomechanical Phenomena , Cadaver , Female , Humans , In Vitro Techniques , Male , Middle Aged , Movement/physiology , Pressure , Range of Motion, Articular/physiology
2.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc ; 15(3): 276-85, 2007 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17031614

ABSTRACT

This study compares the effects of two different techniques of medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction, and proximal soft tissue realignment on patellar stabilization against lateral dislocation. Eight human cadaver knee specimens with no radiological pathomorpholgy on a straight lateral view, contributing to patellofemoral instability, were mounted in a kinematic knee simulator and isokinetic extension was simulated. Patellar kinematics were measured with an ultrasound positioning system (zebris) while a 100 N laterally directed force was applied to the patella. The kinematics were compared with intact knee conditions under MPFL deficient conditions, as well as following dynamic reconstruction of the MPFL using a distal transfer of the semitendinosus tendon, following static reconstruction by a semitendinosus autograft, and following proximal soft tissue realignment of the patella (Insall procedure). Dynamic reconstruction of the MPFL resulted in no significant alteration (P = 0.16) of patellar kinematics. Static reconstruction of the MPFL significantly medialized (P < 0.01) the patellar movement without, but restored intact knee kinematics under the laterally directed force. In contrast, following proximal soft tissue realignment, the patellar movement was constantly medialized and internally tilted (P = 0.04). Dynamic and static reconstruction of the MPFL create sufficient stabilization of the patella. Following proximal soft tissue realignment, the patellar position was over-medialized relative to intact knee conditions, which could lead to an overuse of the medial retropatellar cartilage.


Subject(s)
Ligaments, Articular/surgery , Patella/physiology , Stress, Mechanical , Aged , Cadaver , Female , Humans , In Vitro Techniques , Ligaments, Articular/physiology , Male , Middle Aged , Movement/physiology , Patellar Dislocation/physiopathology , Range of Motion, Articular/physiology , Tendons/transplantation
3.
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) ; 22(3): 327-35, 2007 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17118499

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Surgical reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament used to stabilize the patella against lateral dislocation may concomitantly produce alteration of the patellofemoral contact pressure distribution. Two different tendon transfer techniques of reconstructing the medial patellofemoral ligament, one dynamic and one static, as well as a proximal soft tissue realignment of the patella were investigated. METHODS: Eight human knee specimens were mounted in a kinematic knee simulator and isokinetic extension motion was simulated. Patellofemoral pressure was measured using a pressure sensitive film while a 100 N laterally directed dislocation load was applied to the patella. The specimens were evaluated in a physiologic state, as well as after dynamic reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament using a distal transfer of the semitendinosus tendon, following static reconstruction using a semitendinosus autograft, and following proximal soft tissue realignment of the patella. FINDINGS: Following both reconstruction techniques of the medial patellofemoral ligament patellofemoral contact pressure was not significantly (P=0.49) altered. In contrast, after proximal realignment a trend (P=0.07) towards higher contact pressure near knee extension was observed. In the absence of a lateral dislocation load dynamic and static reconstruction resulted in a medialization (P=0.04) of the center of pressure, whereas under the application of a 100 N dislocation load the center of pressure showed no significant alteration. Following proximal realignment the center of pressure was significantly medialized without (P<0.01) and with a dislocation load (P=0.01) throughout the entire range of knee motion. INTERPRETATION: Static and dynamic ligament reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament did not alter patellofemoral pressure. Proximal realignment, on the other hand, resulted in a constant medialization of the patellofemoral pressure. The data suggest that the reconstruction techniques would be associated with a low risk of causing premature cartilage degeneration due to excessive patellofemoral contact pressure, whereas proximal realignment could cause medial overload of the patellofemoral joint.


Subject(s)
Joint Instability/surgery , Knee Joint/physiopathology , Ligaments, Articular/surgery , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pressure , Plastic Surgery Procedures
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...