Use of metformin before and during assisted reproductive technology in non-obese young infertile women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, multi-centre study.

BACKGROUND: To study the effect of metformin before and during assisted reproductive technology (ART) on the clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) in non-obese women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). METHODS: A multi-centre, prospective, randomized, double-blind study was conducted in eight IVF clinics in four Nordic countries. We enrolled 150 PCOS women with a body mass index <28 kg/m(2), and treated them with 2000 mg/day metformin or identical placebo tablets for ≥ 12 weeks prior to and during long protocol IVF or ICSI and until the day of pregnancy testing. The primary outcome measure was CPR. Secondary outcome measures included spontaneous pregnancy rates during the pretreatment period, and the live birth rate (LBR). RESULTS: Among IVF treated women (n = 112), biochemical pregnancy rates were identical in both groups (42.9%), and there were no significant differences in the metformin versus the placebo group in CPR [39.3 versus 30.4%; 95% confidence interval (CI): -8.6 to 26.5]. The LBR was 37.5 versus 28.6% (95% CI: -8.4 to 26.3). However, prior to IVF there were 15 (20.3%) spontaneous pregnancies in the metformin group and eight (10.7%) in the placebo group (95% CI: -1.9 to 21.1; P = 0.1047). According to intention to treat analyses (n = 149); significantly higher overall CPR were observed in the metformin versus placebo group (50.0 versus 33.3%; 95% CI: -1.1 to 32.3; P = 0.0391). LBR was also significantly higher with use of metformin versus placebo (48.6 versus 32.0; 95% CI: 1.1 to 32.2; P = 0.0383). No major unexpected safety issues or multiple births were reported. More gastrointestinal side effects occurred in the metformin group (41 versus 12%; 95% CI: 0.15 to 0.42; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Metformin treatment for 12 weeks before and during IVF or ICSI in non-obese women with PCOS significantly increases pregnancy and LBRs compared with placebo. However, there was no effect on the outcome of ART per se. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00159575.

[Physicians' work load. A comparison between company physicians and general practitioners in private practice]. / Legers arbeidspress. En sammenlikning av bedriftsleger og privatpraktiserende allmennpraktikere.

The authors describe and compare the work load of 26 general practitioners and 17 company doctors. All of them worked full time. The information was collected by means of a structured telephone interview. The results indicate a higher work load among general practitioners than among company doctors. Despite this, the general practitioners plan to remain working longer than the company doctors do. In both groups of doctors there were some who believed they risked developing the "burn-out syndrome". This problem was found among the youngest doctors, female doctors and doctors with a large number of consultations daily.