ABSTRACT
Rupture of the distal biceps tendon most commonly is secondary to mechanical overload during eccentric muscle contraction. Due to deficits of strength and endurance, surgical repair usually is recommended. Although both single- and double-incision approaches have been described, double-incision techniques have been shown to better re-create the native anatomic insertion. However, excellent and comparable clinical outcomes have been demonstrated with both techniques. Fixation with a cortical button and interference screw has been shown to be the strongest construct biomechanically; however, several modern constructs provide adequate strength. Surgical technique should focus on restoration of anatomy, early range of motion, and prevention of complications. [Orthopedics. 2019; 42(6):e492-e501.].
Subject(s)
Muscle, Skeletal/surgery , Orthopedic Procedures/methods , Rupture/surgery , Tendon Injuries/surgery , Arm/surgery , Elbow/surgery , Humans , Range of Motion, Articular/physiology , Rupture/diagnosis , Tendon Injuries/diagnosis , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
The knee dislocation is a severe, complex injury that can be difficult to treat and is fraught with complications. The first step in a successful reconstruction of a multiple ligamentous knee injury is gaining an accurate and thorough understanding of the pattern of instability imparted by the injury. Evaluation begins with a detailed review of radiographic and advanced imaging studies followed by a thorough physical examination, often done under anesthesia, in conjunction with dynamic fluoroscopy. Failure to identify and reconstruct a damaged ligament may place undue stress on adjacent structures, resulting in complications and potential failure of the surgical procedure.