Serum periostin does not reflect type 2-driven inflammation in COPD.

Although Th2 driven inflammation is present in COPD, it is not clearly elucidated which COPD patients are affected. Since periostin is associated with Th2 driven inflammation and inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)-response in asthma, it could function as a biomarker in COPD. The aim of this study was to analyze if serum periostin is elevated in COPD compared to healthy controls, if it is affected by smoking status, if it is linked to inflammatory cell counts in blood, sputum and endobronchial biopsies, and if periostin can predict ICS-response in COPD patients.Serum periostin levels were measured using Elecsys Periostin immunoassay. Correlations between periostin and inflammatory cell count in blood, sputum and endobronchial biopsies were analyzed. Additionally, the correlation between serum periostin levels and treatment responsiveness after 6 and 30 months was assessed using i.e. ΔFEV1% predicted, ΔCCQ score and ΔRV/TLC ratio. Forty-five COPD smokers, 25 COPD past-smokers, 22 healthy smokers and 23 healthy never-smokers were included. Linear regression analysis of serum periostin showed positive correlations age (B = 0.02, 95%CI 0.01-0.03) and FEV1% predicted (B = 0.01, 95%CI 0.01-0.02) in healthy smokers, but not in COPD patients In conclusion, COPD -smokers and -past-smokers have significantly higher periostin levels compared to healthy smokers, yet periostin is not suitable as a biomarker for Th2-driven inflammation or ICS-responsiveness in COPD.

Recipient gene polymorphisms in the Th-1 cytokines IL-2 and IFN-gamma in relation to acute rejection and graft vascular disease after clinical heart transplantation.

IL-2 and IFN-gamma are associated with acute rejection (AR) and graft vascular disease (GVD) after clinical heart transplantation. Polymorphisms in the genes of IL-2 (T-330G in the promoter) and IFN-gamma (CA repeat in the first intron) influence the production levels of these cytokines. Therefore, these polymorphisms might have an effect on the outcome after transplantation. To investigate possible effects of genetic variations in IL-2 and IFN-gamma genes on AR and GVD, we analyzed the IL-2 T-330G and the IFN-gamma CA repeat polymorphism in DNA of 301 heart transplant recipients. No associations were found for allele or genotype distributions between patients with or without AR (IL-2 allele frequency: P=0.44, genotype distribution: P=0.46; IFN-gamma allele frequency P=0.10, genotype distribution 12 repeats allele: P=0.21). Also, no associations were found analyzing the number (0 vs. 1 vs. >or=1) of AR (IL-2 allele frequency: P=0.59; genotype distribution: P=0.37; IFN-gamma allele frequency: P=0.27, genotype distribution 12 repeats allele: P=0.41) or analyzing the polymorphisms in patients with AR within the first month or thereafter (IL-2 allele frequency: P=0.45, genotype distribution: P=0.38; IFN-gamma allele frequency: P=0.21, genotype distribution 12 repeats allele: P=0.41). Analyzing both polymorphisms in relation to GVD, resulted in comparable allele and genotype distributions (IL-2 allele frequency: P=0.75; genotype distribution: P=0.77; IFN-gamma allele frequency: P=0.70, genotype distribution 12 repeats allele: P=0.63). In conclusion, we did not detect an association between the IL-2 T-330G promoter polymorphism and CA repeat polymorphism in the first intron of the IFN-gamma gene and AR or GVD after heart transplantation.

TGF-beta1 gene polymorphisms in patients with end-stage heart failure.

BACKGROUND: The regulatory cytokine transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta1 is thought to play a role in atherosclerotic heart disease as well as in idiopathic cardiomyopathy. The production of TGF-beta1 is genetically controlled as polymorphisms in the signaling sequence of the TGF-beta1 gene leucine(10)-->proline and arginine(25)-->proline are involved in the regulation of the protein production level. We investigated whether these polymorphisms are associated with end-stage heart failure caused by dilated cardiomyopathy (CMP) or ischemic heart disease (IHD). METHODS: We determined polymorphisms using sequence specific oligonucleotide probing (SSOP) in genomic DNA samples from heart transplant recipients (n = 253) and controls (n = 94). Indications for transplantation were dilated CMP (n = 109) and IHD (n = 144). RESULTS: We found a difference in TGF-beta1 codon 10 genotype distribution among patients with IHD, dilated CMP, and controls (p = 0.034; chi(2) test). Patients with dilated CMP differed from patients with IHD (p = 0.044) and healthy controls (0.017). The genotype distribution between patients with IHD and controls was comparable. For codon 25, we found no difference in genotype distribution. CONCLUSIONS: The Leu(10)-->Pro (codon 10) polymorphism in the TGF-beta1 gene is associated with end-stage heart failure caused by dilated CMP and not with IHD. This observation suggests that TGF-beta1 is involved in the pathogenesis of CMP.

The transforming growth factor-beta1 codon 10 gene polymorphism and accelerated graft vascular disease after clinical heart transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The multifunctional cytokine transforming growth factor- (TGF) beta1 is thought to play a role in the pathogenesis of graft vascular disease (GVD). Polymorphisms at codon 10, (Leu10-->Pro) and codon 25 (Arg25-->Pro) in the signal sequence of the TGF-beta1 gene regulate the production and secretion of the protein. We investigated whether these polymorphisms are risk factors for the development of GVD after clinical heart transplantation. METHOD: TGF-beta1 polymorphisms, Leu10-->Pro and Arg25-->Pro, were determined in DNA from heart transplant recipients (n=252) and their donors (n=213), using sequence-specific oligonucleotide probing. GVD was angiographically diagnosed 1 year after transplantation. In addition other potential risk factors including underlying disease, recipient and donor age, recipient and donor gender, number of acute rejections in the first year, cold ischemia time, and HLA mismatches were analyzed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Univariate analysis showed that the recipient TGF-beta1 polymorphism Leu10-->Pro, (P=0.056, chi2 test), underlying disease (P=0.01, chi2 test), number of acute rejections in the first-year (P=0.03, analysis of variance), and donor age (P<0.001, analysis of variance) were risk factors for the development of GVD. The TGF-beta1 Arg25-->Pro polymorphism was not a risk factor. Also in the multivariate analysis, the recipient TGF-beta1 codon 10 polymorphism was associated with GVD, with patients homozygous for Pro at greatest risk (odds ratio 7.7, P=0.03). Apart for the recipient TGF-beta1 Leu10-->Pro polymorphism, donor age appeared to be an independent risk factor for the development of GVD at 1 year. Patients with older donor hearts were at greater risk than patients receiving grafts from younger donors (odds ratio 1.1/year, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Recipient TGF-beta1 Leu10-->Pro polymorphism and higher donor age are independent risk factors for the development of GVD after clinical heart transplantation.

Renal failure after clinical heart transplantation is associated with the TGF-beta 1 codon 10 gene polymorphism.

BACKGROUND: To determine whether genetic factors are involved in the development of renal dysfunction due to cyclosporine nephrotoxicity, we analyzed 2 polymorphisms in the signal sequence of the transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta 1 gene; codon 10 (Leu(10) --> Pro) and codon 25 (Arg(25) --> Pro). METHOD: Using sequence specific oligonucleotide probing, we analyzed both TGF-beta1 gene polymorphisms in cardiac allograft recipients (n = 168) who survived at least 1 year with minimal follow-up of 7 years. Patients received cyclosporine and steroids as maintenance immunosuppressive therapy. Renal dysfunction was defined as a serum creatinine > or = 250 micromol/liter. RESULTS: Renal dysfunction was observed in 2% (3/168) of the patients at 1 year, in 7% (11/160) at 3 years, in 12% (18/152) at 5 years, and in 20% (26/131) at 7 years post-transplantation. The genotypic distributions for TGF-beta1 codon 10 were 7% Pro/Pro, 61% Pro/Leu, and 32% Leu/Leu, and for codon 25 these percentages were 1% Pro/Pro, 12% Pro/Arg, and 87% Arg/Arg. We found an association between the TGF-beta 1 genotype encoding proline at codon 10 and renal dysfunction. At 7 years post-transplantation, 26% (23/89) of the patients with the heterozygous Pro/Leu or homozygous Pro/Pro genotype had renal dysfunction vs only 7% (3/42) of the patients with the homozygous Leu/Leu genotype (p = 0.017). For the TGF-beta1 codon 25 genotypes, we found no association between TGF-beta 1 genotypes and renal dysfunction. CONCLUSION: Our data support the hypothesis that TGF-beta 1 is involved in the process leading to renal insufficiency in cyclosporine-treated cardiac allograft recipients. In these patients the presence of TGF-beta 1 Pro(10) might be a risk factor.

Functional responses of T cells blocked by anti-CD25 antibody therapy during cardiac rejection.

BACKGROUND: Despite anti-CD25 (interleukin [IL]-2 receptor alpha chain) monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapy, rejection can still occur. T-cell activation through the IL-2 receptor beta and gamma chains by IL-2 or other growth factors may contribute to this rejection. Recently, we have demonstrated that the T-cell growth factor IL-15 was abundantly present in rejecting cardiac grafts during anti-CD25 mAb treatment. METHODS: To test whether IL-2- and IL-15-responsive T cells play an active role in rejection during anti-CD25 mAb therapy, we measured the frequency of IL-2- and IL-15-proliferative T cells in peripheral blood from treated patients during rejection (n=12). Measurements were made by limiting dilution analysis in the absence and presence of extra in vitro-added mouse anti-human CD25 mAb. RESULTS: In the absence of anti-CD25 mAb, the frequencies of peripheral T cells responding to recombinant human (rh)IL-2 and rhIL-15 from patients were lower than those measured in samples of healthy controls (n=7): median of IL-2-responding T cells 78 per 10(6) (range 31-210 per 10(6)) vs. 154 per 10(6) (122-484 per 10(6), P=0.008) and median of IL-15-responding T cells 62 per 10(6) (range 19-207 per 10(6)) vs. 129 per 10(6) (range 79-192 per 10(6), P=0.02), respectively. In the presence of extra in vitro-added anti-CD25 mAb, frequencies of IL-2-responding T cells from patients significantly decreased, although a considerable number of T cells still proliferated on rhIL-2 (median 85%, range 46-100%). In contrast, the frequencies of IL-15 T cells still responding remained stable (median 2%, range 0-50%, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with anti-CD25 mAbs cannot provide complete suppression of T-cell function because significant numbers of IL-2- and IL-15-responsive T cells remain present in the peripheral blood of allograft recipients during anti-CD25 mAb treatment.

Anti-CD25 therapy reveals the redundancy of the intragraft cytokine network after clinical heart transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Despite blockade of the interleukin-2/interleukin 2 receptor (IL-2/IL-2R) pathway by the murine anti-CD25 (i.e., IL-2R alpha chain) monoclonal antibody BT563, cardiac rejection can still occur. In these cases, growth factors other than IL-2 may contribute to allograft rejection. We studied the expression of IL-15, a macrophage-derived cytokine associated with T-cell activation, which interacts with the beta and gamma chains of the IL-2R during rejection episodes under anti-CD25 therapy. METHODS: We measured intragraft IL-15 mRNA expression and the number of IL-15- and CD68-positive cells in posttransplantation endomyocardial biopsies (EMBs; n=45) and in nontransplanted, donor-heart specimens (n=11) by competitive template reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemistry, respectively. RESULTS: IL-15 mRNA expression was present in the majority of posttransplantation EMB specimens (91%, 41/45) and in nontransplanted donor-heart specimens (91%, 10/11). Relative IL-15 mRNA levels were neither associated with transplantation nor with rejection status. After transplantation, the number of IL-15- and CD68-positive cells significantly increased (P<0.001), but IL-15-positive cell counts did not reflect the histological rejection grade. Anti-CD25 treatment, in contrast to its effects on the IL-2/IL-2R complex, had no influence on intragraft IL-15 mRNA and protein production. In rejection EMB specimens, during (n=5) and after (n=8) anti-CD25 therapy, no differences in relative IL-15 mRNA levels, or in IL-15- and CD68-positive cell counts, were measured. CONCLUSIONS: After heart transplantation, high numbers of IL-15- and CD68-positive cells infiltrate the graft. This phenomenon is independent of the rejection status. IL-15 remains present during blockade of the IL-2/IL-2R pathway by anti-CD25 monoclonal antibodies, and it may participate in T cell-dependent donor-directed immune responses, thereby explaining the occurrence of rejection in the absence of IL-2.

The nature of acute rejection is associated with development of graft vascular disease after clinical heart transplantation.

BACKGROUND: To determine mechanisms that trigger graft vascular disease (GVD) after heart transplantation, we studied parameters that reflect both early and late intragraft allogeneic reactions. METHOD: With reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction analysis, mRNA expression of interleukin-2 (IL-2), interleukin-4, interleukin-6, interleukin-10, interferon-gamma, platelet-derived growth factor-alpha, and transforming growth factor-beta was measured in endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) specimens obtained from 34 recipients during the first acute rejection episode (n = 29) or at a comparable time after transplantation for patients without rejection (n = 5) and at time of assessment of GVD by coronary angiography at 1 year (n = 34). RESULTS: At the time of assessment of GVD, mRNA expression of IL-2, interleukin-4, and interleukin-6 were barely detectable, whereas messenger coding for interferon-gamma, interleukin-10, transforming growth factor-beta, and platelet-derived growth factor-alpha genes were constitutively expressed. Moreover, intragraft mRNA patterns of cytokines and growth factors between patients with GVD (n = 17) or without GVD (n = 17) were comparable. In contrast, during the first acute rejection episode a completely different pattern was found. Development of GVD was associated with IL-2 mRNA expression and not with the other cytokines analyzed. IL-2 mRNA was present in 77% of rejection EMB specimens obtained from patients with GVD versus 33% of the EMB specimens obtained from patients without GVD (p = 0.03) and not detectable in EMB specimens obtained from patients with no rejection. Also nonimmunologic risk factors such as longer ischemia time (median 193 vs 141 minutes; p = 0.002) and higher donor age (median 32 vs 23 years; p = 0.02) were associated with GVD. But no relation was found between these nonimmunologic risk factors and IL-2-positive acute rejections. CONCLUSIONS: Nonspecific risk factors and IL-2-positive rejections may independently trigger GVD after clinical heart transplantation.

Blockade of the interleukin (IL)-2/IL-2 receptor pathway with a monoclonal anti-IL-2 receptor antibody (BT563) does not prevent the development of acute heart allograft rejection in humans.

BACKGROUND: Anti-interleukin (IL)-2 receptor (IL-2R) antibodies have been used as rejection prophylaxis after organ transplantation. Despite this induction treatment, acute rejections may occur. We wondered whether these rejections developed via the IL-2/IL-2R pathway. METHODS: In a prospective trial using BT563, a murine IgG1 anti-IL-2R antibody, for rejection prophylaxis after heart transplantation, 20 patients were treated in combination with cyclosporine from the day of transplantation (group A). As a control group, 31 patients were also treated with BT563, but in these patients, cyclosporine treatment was initiated on day 3 (group B). RESULTS: Three patients from group A and two patients from group B died in the first postoperative month (of causes not related to acute rejection) and were left out of the analysis of rejection incidence. Freedom from acute rejection at 1 week after transplantation in group A (14/17; 82%) was lower than in group B (16/29; 55%), although the difference did not reach statistical significance. There was no difference in either the number of acute rejection episodes at 12 weeks or the required rejection treatments between groups A and B. Infectious complications were evenly distributed in both groups. Immunohistochemistry showed that during acute rejection, in the presence of circulating BT563, IL-2R-bearing cells were present in only one of five rejection biopsies (20%), whereas these cells were often present (6/8, or 75%) in rejections occurring in the absence of BT563. The presence of BT563 was associated with a similar difference in the mRNA expression of IL-2 (2/5 vs. 6/8). CONCLUSIONS: Apparently, despite adequate blockade of the IL-2/IL-2R pathway, patients may develop acute rejection, reflecting the redundancy of the cytokine network. The ever-present IL-15 may well be a candidate for overtaking the role of IL-2.