Lower levels of trust in one's physician is associated with more distress over time in more anxiously attached individuals with cancer.

OBJECTIVE: In the present study, we investigated individual differences in the outcome of patient-physician trust when confronted with cancer from an attachment theoretical perspective. We expected that lower levels of trust are associated with more emotional distress and more physical limitations within the first 15 months after diagnosis, especially in those who score relatively high on attachment anxiety. No such association was expected for more avoidantly attached individuals. METHOD: A group of 119 patients with different types of cancer (breast, cervical, intestinal and prostate) completed questionnaires concerning trust (short version of the Wake Forest Physician Trust Scale) and attachment (Experiences in Close Relationship scale Revised) at 3 months after diagnosis. Emotional distress (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) and physical limitations (physical functioning subscales of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30) were assessed at 3, 9 and 15 months after diagnosis. To test the hypotheses, multiple hierarchical regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: Lower levels of trust were associated with more emotional distress and more physical limitations at 3, 9 and 15 months after diagnosis in more anxiously attached patients, but not in less anxiously attached patients. DISCUSSION: These results indicate an attachment-dependent effect of trust in one's physician. Explanations and clinical implications are discussed.

Do patients trust their physician? The role of attachment style in the patient-physician relationship within one year after a cancer diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: The degree of trust in and satisfaction with the physician has been shown to have important implications for treatment outcomes. This study aims to examine individual differences in patients' trust, satisfaction and general distress from an attachment theoretical perspective. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One hundred and thirty recently diagnosed cancer patients of three medical hospitals were extensively interviewed by trained psychologists to assess attachment style. Patients completed standardized questionnaires three and nine months after diagnosis to assess trust, satisfaction and distress. t-tests and repeated measures ANOVAs were used to examine differences between securely and insecurely attached patients and changes over time. A mediation model based on a bootstrapping method was used to examine whether trust mediated between attachment and satisfaction, and attachment and distress. RESULTS: Insecurely attached patients (N = 45, 35%) reported less trust in and satisfaction with their physician, and reported more general distress than securely attached patients three and nine months after diagnosis (p < 0.05). Trust and distress levels did not change over time. Trust mediated between attachment and satisfaction, but not between attachment and distress. CONCLUSION: Insecurely attached patients trusted their physician less than securely attached patients, and in turn were less satisfied with their physician. Their higher levels of general distress were not related to their lower levels of trust. Attachment theory provides a framework to interpret differences in patients' trust, satisfaction and distress, and may help physicians respond in such a way that their patients feel secure, which in turn is expected to result in better health outcomes.